jsqaure99

true say, good example.
0 |/ {' v5 I* Q" L3 sby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
  T/ f# o+ _$ p0 ^$ Btrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.' e# s0 J) Z7 l7 E' `/ h+ r
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕* ^7 X. b0 M* a# h, F
NO OFFENCE
0 I% m) ]( V" N/ ]1 I; [但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣/ i# p' `: K3 [( f
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
) K/ p) f+ X& ^  e# V7 pIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
+ r( j7 g: |$ c- a' u1 r% D% [7 T& z/ tIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢5 {: `0 B% z: o. L: S
我唔知
" V; h: ~* z; i0 f0 Q: X- H/ k. S% N但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐% p. S/ e, S7 u( w+ U& [
會唔會覺得未夠班呢/ k8 _0 h1 H) x# V8 Z# ^
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
- d1 [0 j* D. w) F$ ~* L6 y但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
5 f$ _7 j0 Y. S又點解釋8 H2 O7 D+ \( ~
1 f+ B4 U* A' L! ^7 @, ?9 _' k0 N
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回/ O, u$ n; _/ n
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到% B5 v! [3 t' @2 T. n( a/ h1 Q
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
; ?+ k+ y: u3 w5 r1 Y講得好
, t" J; `' t6 Z5 c" E- T仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
5 s) ^6 P2 J+ \) t, W我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
' i* w* {. S( v' m3 x) p0 n, p1 Z; A  j% \! H, U- J1 Z5 e0 J8 D$ a
1 x4 X7 i9 G$ X: A8 w
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據' o5 }: Q$ a" X* ]

) E' t1 |2 \1 r" w- t5 ]) @! {用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

+ V7 y8 z1 Q6 V3 ]+ z( y$ B7 f/ Z- H( p

7 A) _: U6 b* L5 u5 O" |: P6 X唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗