jsqaure99

true say, good example.# n$ t: N8 f* x9 A. G) E
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
1 S9 ^1 D$ G+ H/ jtrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.8 Q/ O% G) }7 B+ \3 D- P" ]' z
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕- \1 x+ y# z' ~0 K# o- Z" U
NO OFFENCE , J$ H1 l# a4 E" O
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣# k) W: U6 t+ l: `
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
7 w; k) ^7 C+ p0 U7 }IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
+ a2 s! b1 n/ \, J. e0 ZIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢4 ]2 b% q$ R0 K  j5 _
我唔知
) c, O8 Z% Q% c! A4 I3 l但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
" r  h8 p" o* v5 k) Z會唔會覺得未夠班呢
9 I. |9 P& Q9 K- P1 g( N& @人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附+ i) Y2 S0 L' r
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
9 d- \6 b; j7 }; r" f' D' l又點解釋
+ Q0 Q" B$ m2 ]: E# L' X; E3 r* b6 Q  X( n# o' m: C* ~
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回, {. H. i) f1 w2 W8 s
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到0 @  O9 M$ a2 v' |& [# L
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材5 y# I/ Q7 D9 H; @/ _5 a
講得好
$ F( D5 T# L# j7 H7 H) h  t: c# a# n仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈7 g% s! q- F. y: K' G7 |7 O
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
) y# v/ ^! P8 f3 l- g7 W& S! n# a. z

; w7 F  Q* t8 O% F: ?証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
4 M) e$ K' [+ H  ~% U* F$ v
0 A; [' ?* V7 G6 I用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

  l& O7 Q4 t0 q6 t! c
  ^  I) G# ^8 y( A# l% [4 P6 H$ k
) x% h% w0 _2 P唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗