jsqaure99

true say, good example.' |/ T# V+ O. Y+ ?2 w6 s
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
+ x' \: d4 D4 _8 j8 m( v6 v2 ~trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
5 `5 J4 M+ i1 a, Q( _. b1 k% h8 M$ Mno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕3 Y7 w3 c2 `( k' R# f. d0 `
NO OFFENCE $ U- `/ w5 U; y6 a
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
2 r* r9 {7 P. |" G6 A係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
' c2 Q2 V! v# Y! ^5 ^IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢5 Q) T5 G* |% T# A0 U- [1 x
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢& b8 P0 R  l( Z& s, A% ]) S
我唔知' _2 ?& b  J* }$ s
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
, _$ x- Z( H* v# q: w會唔會覺得未夠班呢" Z% U6 g1 U: R0 ?9 E
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
" x3 m% B! R+ Q% P+ g  Q但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
8 i  q% C* C9 z* r2 }; p3 m又點解釋
7 N; n; t+ T3 A2 g4 h9 M4 v/ W/ c# A: @% l
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回. N# v9 D) i+ n" ~" G
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到7 ~* e% g- ^2 A  @6 \7 f
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材, W  n, j& _# q4 s. n6 K% X2 p
講得好7 x7 `% V) g$ K( _8 p2 ?# v( n2 L
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈* I% e9 ^6 w# o$ X/ s4 ?
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
9 w4 Q# A( }$ v2 W# k  k4 S3 v% h! Z2 w4 x  b. K* }
- J- i& K% l4 R# r3 S
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
5 q, y8 _! ?) x5 W) n& P5 d) K7 v' T& |# a
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

4 H) `  ~3 ]2 X' e# L9 K: X& D9 L- g$ p5 g0 p
0 y. m2 q0 D# ^0 s( C
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗