sk

Here are my suggestions on your approach:
0 G- N- X' Z' V* B" _) _1.        Your letter portraits a Pope with negative attitude towards changes. Is that fair to the Pope of that time? What did he really do?
9 [* ~7 I5 j3 ?: x4 {2.        Science advance, and social injustice are facts. But are they really related to church? Or people just blamed everything to church like HK people blame everything to HK gov’t?
) \$ ~- ]8 g. {9 L3.        Could he modify the church belief to fit in the changing world- like Mr. Tang of China in the ’80?

sk

Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-11-19 08:24 AM:$ Z3 n- |( u! L9 `+ T0 n
$ V5 J+ l9 f2 H7 p: y* S+ k
2.        Science advance, and so...

' u" T+ s* N3 l; R( \  ^
( F8 q( L1 L3 `! N$ u+ z
Your reasoning is ok. I just think "To execute one as a warning to a hundred" is a very negative reaction and there are other ways that Pope can view the situation. That's why I suggested point #1, and #3 in post #3.5 p+ O# G8 {3 [
4 r4 T5 _+ G3 p2 _
[ Last edited by sk on 2006-11-19 at 03:30 PM ]