coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
- t6 R9 A0 A1 A# W+ g7 H( P我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

9 c6 X8 i9 q, @6 w7 Z; R) O9 v

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:0 K! [% ~4 ?! \9 r% x
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

7 P* J/ h2 f5 U
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~1 O/ P8 m2 B" q3 @0 X6 [5 ~
" A9 l/ O) T: z7 h! Y2 S, ^& g
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
5 \5 S+ p% F; J4 y
- @. K' L5 Y& l) b- ?* Q; b/ v請珍惜會員戶口!~1 W; q4 s8 l8 m  ~& D( }& t1 C

- @& C' t# o0 Y; x+ ~" m' _8 X
5 A3 Y& [! ^/ w3 l. p3 T- l6 O
! w3 Q7 Z5 f2 z- q( n0 C. N
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:2 N' i  G6 s- r$ d% ]  L
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

/ p) S4 t5 ]! ?! N4 m

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
: w* u" k* ]) M8 L* _) f我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

2 R! m: o6 x$ b' m6 P5 W

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
7 y) p* e0 A8 D/ f  y5 l/ @& ~2 @* a: L
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。$ y" w/ N9 m4 z& N+ U
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

) E# d: k5 |: N3 x呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ 8 U1 F$ f0 r+ y* R8 @. a
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
  I1 U) R/ m! ]8 D/ K, B% D0 T有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~