coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
: O$ Z8 \5 c; k9 Q: f! D我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

% P% B1 L) W* o1 Z1 `2 N% `, r

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
3 O& e9 {: f/ W9 e我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 m  C4 d9 N0 a' _! z9 I# I( b參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~2 Q. d2 P) S2 g5 r+ E8 a

/ y# ?: v8 t: @無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~! b1 I3 @: n) Y' Q

5 k. }8 O" S2 f7 ~. u" I1 R請珍惜會員戶口!~
; V# F' ]) P7 y1 s- F/ c# `) C! `! ?- W

+ H% J* }8 E  e9 n" H# K9 l9 N4 M+ D7 |' Q8 C# h
9 z8 |( |& g$ g; j2 }
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:) ~% R# |: L0 w  R2 h
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

$ k* ?4 G( R1 s/ v& h0 B" D

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
6 Y7 X9 M, ?* K0 p$ S我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

( Z2 m4 m" S& v1 a" F& w0 `

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
. G; |" Q7 f/ u/ |: @' T: i/ c3 ?
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。# R3 v6 Y5 \! b9 c
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

1 e6 k1 O2 Z# _; l呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
$ m/ Y* L5 s4 F; O/ H成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~0 `4 p+ _/ u/ w/ n  v3 A
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~