coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:& a$ J0 }: W) c5 m
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

3 H7 z0 I0 |/ @9 u3 P  U

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:  A+ V; ]* k; R3 t- G' o4 ]; O& ^
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

  B' g6 [/ d$ i1 h& V
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~* P6 v" Q5 d0 w! w3 Z

# M! W: u0 T, k) ^4 p無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~9 D6 e; O/ g% i' O: r* I" s( R# x2 J

: b, W; d" S* I# ~5 R請珍惜會員戶口!~
3 M" Q' n; R2 k# ~# h: \, n4 L: E. F3 L/ F% p

, B, }+ K( n& O
% d& n. k( d# g5 l) R" n& B' B( s: A( b" B5 d* E; \! S
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
4 T% O$ b. ^! M9 S, f我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

3 @( w2 g6 H3 f* D3 S( Y7 B

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:5 u/ U" ]& I/ o& S5 e4 ~
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

  U% H& |: |" e. C  `7 Q/ V. D

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:/ e/ X; c, P' a, K! i' ^; Y$ ~0 {

8 W# `, h6 P2 K; u, E* Z立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。6 E/ M2 _7 J8 ~6 X
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

/ l. b: s9 e, a
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ , }( O0 x$ }2 Z8 c; K
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~! ]; I: I7 O/ s0 l; o
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~