coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
/ m8 K3 ?+ i: x2 H: Y- X' t我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

& K. S. l: H  ]7 ?

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:& E) a3 R5 T) a' T- w  I) ~7 v
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 @5 R. t% f( X
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
0 a& N3 `7 N2 v! z3 E
$ O$ W" F# W5 g1 f: v& A# E無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
- z. |1 n- k0 S5 I2 s) R( v$ }6 n4 M
& h6 B9 R7 q) a' j( W* W4 Z: }( ~. N: w請珍惜會員戶口!~
9 L/ v' k( \, X3 z% X* }8 G( J  i5 A8 l4 L0 f+ A

2 C: d2 H/ u& l' O) W* B6 n7 u- a1 U. q5 G

! E' S' u+ o* ?" N講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
( g( s3 g- ?* B" S% e/ ^5 \' b我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

6 b* m. S1 ]0 N! k! E* {3 i

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
' M. T% U. {+ i/ U我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

7 C! Q, Z* Q- X# b  ]1 N

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
" F+ U, e: ?$ ^) B  D
( A  O/ N2 Q0 T9 f6 u. k立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
% a, Z# D8 d4 H; G/ a- k咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

& q8 \7 R! ?/ j
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
- `% L2 r9 x' F成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~( H& g' Z- {, f. G2 [
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~