coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
+ ^$ f$ w* d2 K$ k9 p6 F' p我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 b5 k, z$ \, k) e

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
6 c- I, i8 e' z' ~6 W, h我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

9 R" T2 I3 y5 D/ z& n$ K: ~& W參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~  c- w( G6 j; k& f$ ?! Y  ]9 O9 {

7 ^. ?8 U% e9 p! A. m# {無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
; q6 F: G9 ^7 ~; q2 P
7 x( Q$ S/ b6 V. a- |請珍惜會員戶口!~
! T. [; L: i7 F" X% J$ c1 }9 [% O+ T1 B3 k" ~7 e
$ K( o8 z- h" o

- J. _3 q  w' X8 g+ S/ ~# a- s7 _: M0 b* T8 n/ l4 ^
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:6 t2 X9 y, Z, {/ U0 x
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

0 E8 C; V; e$ `9 I

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
1 G2 ~' R# M  ]/ V我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

' I; A% E1 o. o8 S! {

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
4 F$ |; W) X, _3 L" B2 m- S6 k6 o6 `2 j
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。/ q; F; m. f* M9 y& A) Z2 g
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

5 S$ S3 p0 N5 u  {2 K' {9 `
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
# [1 a) U9 f2 \, y成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~3 V4 A9 X# ?3 c. g% Q- \) p3 g' I
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~