coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
: O8 z) }2 N6 D& I- Y$ Y我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

2 G; l5 U' |$ d; u0 L2 u* d, S

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
+ S' U$ b! Q5 _) f我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

4 c8 Q5 P9 N: V4 M參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~' Z+ E; [6 P2 u0 @
* M( a) O6 Z- T* E6 P# q
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
0 Z4 p2 y( o& V) H0 z, C$ o9 [# c  Y/ N0 u0 w
請珍惜會員戶口!~
( B5 Y  D8 w9 D2 C+ d3 @0 m
5 z) Y$ p5 |0 \6 Y; M" M4 J' w# F* A% x; u7 Z2 T  j7 O

0 L. ?- n) s+ M& `) R
0 E5 B! q2 z+ K. d8 O講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
5 A% N, Y4 i: {$ q" H4 c% G, r& G5 p1 f我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

) j! E6 A8 U8 c3 X8 }# {

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:% t$ u& E# y1 q- y0 c
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

5 P3 O' i- f8 V% y- Y

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
3 s/ U. Z" J! p
: w; ?" R4 L0 C8 ^$ r7 v立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
' j3 J1 g/ b9 J$ ^) V咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

& j  B  S+ x0 s4 B& N8 f
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ 8 g' R$ o2 m% H1 _( \2 Y
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
- {6 {6 I' w# ?2 ]7 w4 a有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~