coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
# F% K4 f8 ^5 x! m4 |/ \* B我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

4 n, y2 R' L1 f& _- N6 ]0 {5 Z

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
  y3 v0 p2 Y0 [3 D+ R我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

+ q8 b/ T$ {1 L" Y* R參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
. |8 z3 I) {/ t' Y# d% [: f; ~# J' Q4 n. q" G
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
& Q- V( B/ I& @9 c6 Z3 v7 x
$ s& ~( g8 x& G請珍惜會員戶口!~
, N  C$ \; Y% ]6 h" ^* O9 Z) C# u8 i, ?

# ^& X) z3 A% O; T7 o7 s; l8 c0 {3 N) l: O: Y0 `
* X2 b' ~! O( Y2 J4 V" g+ @) S0 Y
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
: Z; J7 x3 V/ ^( V. x' ?# K5 c  J( y我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

0 Y8 S5 {) u* m8 t. ~

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:: V$ A, p. Q4 q' r# g; j
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

5 A' A0 b- l; p: x' Q0 Y

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:  ^* `9 T0 V4 F
6 i0 X* w# L; ?* u5 K- l
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。2 f8 x5 N! ?# t' ?" v, M
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

/ w6 `: h# N( u7 f+ L6 S+ A$ Q
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
* o0 y5 i. d/ b3 A! U2 Q# M成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~. H! I! g0 A0 ~6 V% X. H; {
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~