|
     
- 帖子
- 15894
- 精華
- 2
- 威望
- 9737
- 魅力
- 12
- 讚好
- 0
|
2#
發表於 2007-5-20 04:47 AM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
: }" ?5 @9 X( p; y$ L9 F" W我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方) 3 k4 q6 x; l2 ~5 m- l$ c4 [Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:5 f; z5 Z- h3 V5 ` D% w! w
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方) # y! j) R9 H; v( D eOriginally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:6 U6 y0 M$ p6 o+ W/ j: f# u- L
4 H! L i) W2 o7 D: G) y+ I& Y
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。$ u+ |+ j) [5 t
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係... 3 X7 y: `. k8 m+ E& D! a& F/ b
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
k: i: {1 \/ g+ Q成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
- V+ B& }: T6 B) O2 s8 u/ i: A有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~ |
|