coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
$ ^) |* f1 G. K$ d' p$ _1 P我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

8 f) M. j, i* A5 c7 g- C/ r

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
+ u8 b4 _% }" e我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

8 x2 M$ X! q" V參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
/ Y; y& Y  t  I7 j- Z/ z; B8 g$ x* b+ q' F" `( L/ q
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~; B" D5 }) g. A# x; `9 k  A
* w0 D/ z2 Y1 b. k2 |
請珍惜會員戶口!~
( F9 ~+ C0 R2 A* L' c* {* Y5 D
9 \' D: Z* e9 e7 b8 ]+ h, X0 J. i/ o
  `: O. k; h2 p' u; J: R  K" R! t: o( u/ a2 y4 G. w, b- e

8 Y7 P. ?- M8 n4 L2 U% Y9 N$ `* H講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
/ ^) _1 W( ^8 c% V0 d我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

" R. A; L1 Y- y8 m4 G

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
, S- [- S) e: d( M5 ]8 @, Y我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

) {% n5 j3 x' e5 |. C& L: I, f0 A

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:4 f1 [' z( b7 R2 J+ ]

5 \8 J) ~3 f2 m) d0 W' U立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
1 B- I1 M& c$ l$ m# {咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

# W3 _8 l; }% B( y8 x* P9 I呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ : u# O% v# q0 {8 g6 N
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
' S* f0 _8 z8 |6 e* r有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~