coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
; \- w2 X6 C& I2 Z, R$ N0 o我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

( Z' U8 C+ n, ]7 H

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
% A; g( X+ M3 D2 ^3 d; X我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

- L3 d  H5 V' R1 U- u, N, S參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
( i) ~% v! e+ s' u0 [' e9 L
/ z5 A- J/ Z5 [  s; z無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
+ H2 J1 s: G7 r$ |# H5 k' t3 H. a# o7 s2 \7 T9 E
請珍惜會員戶口!~
9 i* K; q$ f  H# R
* z5 Y) {$ g$ L  `
( H2 ~7 @0 G0 n: _. w$ a* h5 _: S0 m' d% C( J
* d% s. M( H5 f  K$ n" o
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
( ?" w. p, U7 ?$ X我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

  c2 j( x% u5 O- H/ h6 @& W

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
4 t3 e4 J1 X2 d+ ~8 r% ~+ H% G我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

: N" h; v& \* h' f. q

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:% a9 p( ]% i: p' _9 |7 z
! F' H% ]$ a) b3 e! P
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。& j* A3 S+ h$ e5 g3 l, G! C- v
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

' c! _% X/ r9 R( T: v4 H) A. W6 F5 ?
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
+ ^6 \5 _5 \7 \成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
- f% m+ d6 d" [; r3 A有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~