coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:1 x* U* W8 p4 O2 w6 @. |
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

. n5 a9 |; E- ~* ~, V

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
/ m& W9 I* o, i$ v$ p我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

) ~3 K- W% U2 K3 l% g: o* ^參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
- e4 L% o9 r$ I+ W& B" k6 X) v9 M- R/ x
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
" N, F3 G$ ~& g- \4 K/ |7 e- o. w0 n4 `4 L$ \1 q
請珍惜會員戶口!~1 |, M" D& T" e7 n  w/ g
3 N4 w: ]( m5 V/ b' E$ o1 `' `8 l
- Y9 ?' C9 ~& ?) |( r
- N8 t; [1 Q$ Y/ K0 K# N  X8 C. ~- i

, ?: Q$ @: \& K( w- [講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
: }" ?5 @9 X( p; y$ L9 F" W我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

3 k4 q6 x; l2 ~5 m- l$ c4 [

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:5 f; z5 Z- h3 V5 `  D% w! w
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

# y! j) R9 H; v( D  e

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:6 U6 y0 M$ p6 o+ W/ j: f# u- L
4 H! L  i) W2 o7 D: G) y+ I& Y
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。$ u+ |+ j) [5 t
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

3 X7 y: `. k8 m+ E& D! a& F/ b
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
  k: i: {1 \/ g+ Q成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
- V+ B& }: T6 B) O2 s8 u/ i: A有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~