coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:6 M# X% ?. E$ y' l8 Y4 E
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

5 s% j2 ~! O: ?4 V

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
7 W! Z7 p( S0 _我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

( M6 N0 J& V/ I& y2 ?" F  q" W( P參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
' A6 J# }# E3 N
4 @9 u# T3 j: B- s  j' Z9 R4 G無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~; e" e4 W% i6 ]- g/ a- _) x1 w3 I1 N
- ?- o& `( j$ ]2 Z
請珍惜會員戶口!~
8 L) L/ o4 x" p; J1 {9 x0 s
% q( l: c9 G$ M) B0 Z, u
! d( s4 g+ \  h! {- o7 t2 z
# n" }! J  o; F% w5 ~. z7 t& S$ Q6 Z9 N. G
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:1 v, \( B* k7 t! A
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

* A1 D! ^/ ~3 S$ M

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
( p/ z5 {) G8 a+ G2 }. E) c, O' L我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

2 q6 i& {$ q1 d0 N  a2 B* M

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
: R3 Y6 [' c4 _4 ]5 `% H8 F' ?' Y6 Y! R$ i2 C0 \
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
, `. A# Y/ @. X; Q' Y. Q) j$ j: {咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

0 }) A/ i5 p2 L+ A5 u/ j( a呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
! s- c# P% j! B( z成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~: E2 s" V/ R- y+ b. ^$ _% t
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~