|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
2 ]6 ]$ M& @: x' U8 G/ C) }; _( g& p7 V
+ [1 S. D. O* V: U: ]" [同意.2 {2 M+ E( ]6 t' K5 Z, M, u9 R
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... $ K. m# U1 A' a1 `, A% F
+ A. M- t7 I# UI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.- z5 V1 L( y* }& Q& W8 v
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students( h2 f- B7 G/ j7 ?/ e
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles., \+ Y: z9 s- l" A! N
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.4 o9 b; D b0 w
; k% m2 A) w2 j+ Y/ }4 O
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
5 r: E4 R4 D5 u2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
* `9 ]3 J) G, i5 L) C3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published) v! P2 _9 q) v$ l" ^
; A o( J! ]2 s* c X7 t- D+ QThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|