 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:( m- x) Q) h# N" W, v
6 q4 x ?2 t5 ^- ?
( {" ]& J/ T1 s) b1 Z) Y同意.$ z2 {7 V" n. W0 R/ F- D# ~: J6 m5 k' ^
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 2 X h* |7 n$ Z% J1 p5 @
" m# Q' l( D+ } F+ lI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.; H* N2 {. U$ ]4 Q5 `
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
* k2 J: h+ N! C% a, Y( QI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
2 m% k: u3 V7 f1 S( g5 y0 B8 v/ e0 R+ EAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.0 y8 {8 |$ H$ O) \
1 j, b$ |8 ]3 C4 F' h1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law L+ u3 ?6 ]% w- l# F
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
8 L# t8 ]! R$ |+ B3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
4 }! S5 d5 Z! f& d2 Z* ]7 x
. R0 ^5 U) {1 |6 q* o. Y; kThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|