|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
! S2 n, \$ J& b$ w9 v$ ]- _% F1 M' J4 M8 @) |
Y+ j+ w2 j1 D0 z7 T5 S, P4 Q同意.
9 o4 Q* X* S6 f( S2 z; P: j7 b, }但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 3 N/ t- s J- U
7 W7 ]3 j0 h/ q' Z4 a& E) I' x1 r
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
7 X6 N% f, P; M* W/ g1 f) aYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
4 n# ]2 F/ l. D& v; ?6 M; S" LI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
T9 _8 W+ S0 n4 ^+ SAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
: S* Q1 y- h5 U; {3 y: p- @ m. @9 P2 T' x
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
2 r* K/ ^# C* R1 F2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper9 A/ H. S: `' D5 X! w, b
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published7 ~* f9 E* Z5 x k
$ [+ R3 c; Z" B! V* Y+ vThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|