 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
) R# e: O5 B J: Y$ b1 O; p3 b% _: ]! N5 \1 Y% f
: w2 n* m9 g: Z; q3 M
同意.
& F9 C, k$ `, ~但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... L3 U- T$ X) z' J8 I# L* X- B& N3 u8 O
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
# \, w. `! c; b5 n# T0 P- FYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
; ^; m, v) A' VI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
) y1 u6 J. R; u5 V/ iAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.5 }3 b, i( h/ \ E
7 W# i: v4 Y8 z3 J* S& j: s& H8 E1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law4 q0 o- _* w+ @9 K U# c$ {
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper1 P1 i# W/ ? x
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published! p0 q7 n* l% ?
& X9 }, W9 {. ~8 j( v( D" T' ~Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|