|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
1 U7 t, A5 S: i% U* u2 N4 c3 j, P& x1 M- u# x& h: J3 z1 S
, U# N+ h. c4 y6 G- L
同意.
; ]+ Z/ g+ K3 `+ u( C但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... 9 ~6 A3 L' B, G7 m
' l* Q0 P2 C- o) @- w7 r9 II do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.0 A e3 W( d/ o. R
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
* R4 }3 e4 |0 |3 RI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.9 P8 t0 \; M+ x3 ?
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
4 p' N4 w7 K& p9 S7 a
2 S+ E# Q7 v& N7 U1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law. H' L8 t1 _, d8 L: Z
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
- [9 Q& q0 q8 f4 P5 \3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published4 K7 [" X, b% V+ L# a
- C% V4 L% h* h5 \% l/ s8 w& P0 kThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|