 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:% P! D8 H. z) R8 e
) o4 s* Z, @, g; @% h9 N3 I
0 a Q) `1 m* D9 S
同意.# g5 O1 q, t d6 D5 w# \
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... . c! \, n6 @ n' @& T1 ^( |% j' Z3 K
( ^2 }$ X( C6 HI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
0 n% q6 c' g K$ Y; p! A& D6 kYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
- c3 U+ Q: S; @% W v. ~' CI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.6 v# Y2 ^8 f6 j& L7 q t& u: M
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.
( I* n# g' d1 b* C9 v' f; H
. ^& h4 g- v' a$ q1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
! Z9 Z* f' \1 R$ S- j! \) p/ F2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
, A$ z/ j1 Y: X6 q* H" I0 {3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published% H0 _3 g. g! x) D
, a4 z7 L6 X+ h8 VThanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|