|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:; L1 W; d2 d" ~/ L3 |6 W4 t- d
5 y9 B7 p, `- j# B2 V( Z/ k: g/ [) f4 }: | Q% h
同意.: k% j7 f5 A0 s& x! U. {( I8 I
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... ; E( U" y! ~ V; K# i
( _9 o, s& |) u; d1 z' ~7 Q2 II do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.
3 @& P: b( H. I1 a wYour analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
# V! i' {8 s, ?3 d% s& vI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
p3 _0 @+ p* d% MAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter./ M7 e, _ P! P, l- C f5 z
' G4 K. a5 T- T
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
- P) U" j3 g2 t! t( ^' d2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper5 _& y- \6 N) b! C3 y: \/ _
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
) Z- ]4 Z9 N) M! S/ \7 t+ k& }2 N6 b( f- I; g
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|