|
 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
3#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
/ N5 K* Z3 v! d" I" O5 C; U3 _
" U# x/ N% q. y# {; L e
9 d( ~0 J0 j A. e( {4 v同意.+ k$ ^9 ~; f5 m: V# V/ l
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... ( g3 _/ ^) R6 Z. l: H# S7 }5 ~. F2 P- b
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.( }$ b* e; o' Y; D5 W8 O. ^: H. v
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students+ X: f' M. i, @, y' ?
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
0 ?) J X1 Y0 Y) MAs a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter. k6 z% T6 _$ ]" ~. I
. f9 o, [& x3 z5 ~
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law3 [1 a0 W3 a8 y
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
2 E3 N& m& o& o4 |$ O7 N/ s/ _3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
, [3 x/ L( Y- w9 H. F& C$ Q" |& C) W
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|