奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:! F, V9 }" Y* b) B: I
8 G% |; }) I; D6 x
agree,
, ^$ f* s8 f+ t9 z+ s: C我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
& j' u, `( e' Z6 O% j5 w1 \5 A4 c1 {6 E但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,# S* v; c8 f: ~
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

4 n  }+ _% l8 b
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html" i  b  D2 n0 e2 E. r) {- O
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
, h" _$ Z6 W, R0 J: o& r搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.3 D* c% E% S# \. N( Z7 {' r
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
! m% S) M4 Z/ E* I0 J有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 3 C, n3 l, D* @# `) b  B& B
# m4 u3 ^$ N( m8 z1 J3 _9 R
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???# d. l0 w0 n0 B* _
/ ~7 u# N( J, f5 ^- a
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

3 H  @( Q6 B% }3 K7 k% y

7 x! C+ o4 l; M' g0 T" e. U絕對支持啦
! \; z* X, z& P# a2 A
/ E" h( F  X' C9 z- v有錯就認,打就企定
, j5 N. ]( @4 d3 k; ?3 T
, u- y* _  R2 G無錯當然要撐到底7 d$ b% U/ T$ d# L5 ^' f2 u0 R
- ]/ Q: Y# X5 {
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
) r  R4 ~: F* k9 K
& N" ]0 Y0 b/ z+ D在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
7 X( J$ l) y" B8 F1 J$ j7 M
: g/ w! O9 q+ g, A0 A( H3 `: T$ |一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
% I2 R9 K5 h( h) e8 C  @8 R1 O- \
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
5 g2 p! k2 e& |5 x# E- d( ]5 C9 t* |( I
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?0 [  g# L( ~7 j5 ^9 S& L, K- I0 r

) ]" r6 p6 C' i* Z- [我唔認為lor
! L8 y9 O. E5 e% u( i" W5 ^9 u  {! V% J. X& o6 \& p
唔係話要整死佢地
, k+ z6 R$ ~0 n4 U' L
! x$ @1 k$ q  l* y8 |$ y+ D而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
- m- V0 l! B% A9 `5 l, w5 Y, a1 ^" J% e4 L& I
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大1 x% u) ^& h: ^3 Q
0 w: s8 q: D. g, C! W: i# J! w) u
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
: d7 ~/ |: u: [% }! l/ f. J2 F
% N. H% _4 p4 N( N0 A唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
6 T. N" I, f" i& S+ S4 s3 x9 `1 f% G1 i# j
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
3 n/ d) |, F' I"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
! g% _, A  u# U
% W, W  |5 j( ]# ?8 y% K- @5 w我們的大學生+ L4 E5 ]: T- j+ g' n1 T3 f2 v, F
1 t) ^. L+ C) \8 q& Q6 T

, n, H0 i; j8 P$ j+ \9 g" w# A; M% O$ ^

3 k; H& K" z, U, `/ Y

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
/ ^/ C" U. v( P" q+ T# v7 g
8 T3 \+ o* T. b, d2 t6 w' w) X- ~2 Z& [
有見地 !!!6 j) S4 y& |' a0 @5 z9 ]
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html+ j  ?: L& }8 o. l6 J+ D
% O; `8 F0 z7 H7 n/ i3 G
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
; a) p, M5 |2 g1 B; HI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
' w7 `' \3 `% B# E) @* lI pretty sad that about the University official.5 y' A  {( V. W0 n
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
2 g) k% S- I; n& K9 \1 |5 m( ~$ a, S6 I% W# O/ n1 e1 k: v- q
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:- T3 r. x2 T3 j) A- _. q8 T
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
7 u7 Q, E, J" \# G) ^( c3 G; B# x  J, Q' B; f. [
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

$ q0 c6 X+ G/ W/ i1 Z0 E) [- b+ A: \

4 _" S' J0 c6 @  H兩者有何分別?2 G1 d$ m) ]: I  a
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?