奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:+ ~6 y5 p8 S) C* y/ m0 W9 r0 ]1 V1 S

: n0 {0 `" Q: \/ j" Q' u( V3 Zagree,
% X8 h9 ]* E7 Z3 O我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,3 h2 n4 U' X: l% ?; X
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,( c$ P  s% @+ U* }: x- V
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

0 {& h% g( y# o
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html1 m2 N8 M- Z" R# B- Q
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地8 o- [; I" R* V# y7 D
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
1 |2 ^$ o" S0 b2 fJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:  g8 ^4 m; W' S; x; K2 s
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ . A! ?. Y! a6 a: ]" M/ f. l

# w( T& D" Y/ U' [- }係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???0 F6 z. X, _! J$ V7 T8 c# [

: s  j4 h9 H; o為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

: t+ Y$ `) {  P1 a

$ k% C* E4 K  J絕對支持啦
) f5 D4 t3 R- d7 j- b0 k9 F( S/ P& U3 U  h0 L, t* R* u2 n
有錯就認,打就企定9 `" _, {6 S) W+ |# C% k5 @; y
* s1 U7 l7 X% F
無錯當然要撐到底
: `. T  E6 Q8 M8 n! g" K- Z% N1 m' ?2 K# o& c: w
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩3 C; R' K& R' v

! a0 b, z% r; R4 i在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
9 @# _5 w. O  K7 D! L+ B& w+ G& L/ ~6 R1 A, H5 @; C
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力, K) h& ?, D+ n% T. n( G2 V

+ e1 n. [7 G' a2 y3 R我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
" d3 |6 q1 }  p6 r# y" H" `
0 _( z! v1 W: ?5 T: a/ {+ D4 h唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?* M& V; Y% ]/ ^( P9 ~  ?6 U+ v

' q  z) g- s: B/ g) d我唔認為lor! m% t; ?9 m% _

( X/ b  C) {+ |唔係話要整死佢地- R% Z- P! I% u$ J. o' Z

+ [  \8 p* G' q9 m' Y+ u. o2 ^/ c而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
; o. B" {; B2 y6 u$ s) e$ U5 ?
) A$ `+ d8 s$ H! p9 X( m" o6 H我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大# `. q  H" N. I4 u" r( Y: m
& t8 f0 \! j2 ^5 r1 d2 ~! m" o
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
9 D9 s; x: i; L5 M% b2 S( B5 k& m1 L+ Z8 m
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由1 v  K& Y* e/ i. C

4 q* d( S! P0 i* B% @大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
; M2 ?9 j8 ^+ p1 p' Y"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
  G3 K8 j8 h8 A4 [, O6 W1 k% P/ {* g. F0 e
我們的大學生, x9 r+ l  u7 t

# I/ b1 H/ W3 c5 Q4 c! n. H9 D' ?! K0 |9 l
9 K8 h% F5 c/ p" c+ D7 Y+ i; y

2 l; ~/ H; V# q  |

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
& c. h, l0 O" X3 k8 X$ w9 {- F" j) d
8 |* }6 K  v1 ^$ f- _& ~2 B' C$ t4 p8 t* m) `+ V
有見地 !!!6 t$ F  G7 A: o! S- A4 w2 r
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
2 E$ P2 r; Z/ o& X/ @! x4 \3 ^! w
6 F- [  q/ [* z9 g# s* oI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 8 `! F  O1 [* Q; _: f2 ~- T
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
- k# j, v; c# g1 v) s2 W3 Y" z7 o- fI pretty sad that about the University official.! _. U$ u: I. [6 n4 ~4 Z; S9 i2 o
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
+ Y( m- a2 c' Z7 P5 m
3 d  X; a8 }: v2 F1 p$ v0 o[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:: {& {* q  W- L9 k
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
% `; K% t8 ?- M5 Z3 F, ?6 {
* }8 R& M- m9 b  [$ T[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

8 J6 T! h7 [+ r2 n

$ R) T" M; _9 j$ ^2 E4 i3 O4 ], S兩者有何分別?, ^0 J. U9 `0 h  R
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?