奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
: U( V) \% Z- @  D! k- @8 p) H
: ~" U! Q. D5 l7 _$ q( s* Xagree,
8 z$ q- `% \# O' W, A我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
) _' f* ?7 _& u" O0 @+ K: y但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,. a& {3 d8 z/ ~5 C7 z) I$ Z2 l
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

) n3 z4 ^# Y4 |- X9 x2 B& A6 j
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' p5 @. ~1 H+ Q; C; m& E, R
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
4 I. t- _; @; x& n+ q搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
/ y: t7 |* R; I6 X! gJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
" i' j' p' a# g: Z0 q& n. T有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
7 p) k- e$ [' L6 j1 V) n* T, k+ {, f3 p/ F$ ]* }" X/ G! v
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???- O: |+ C# ^( X# A+ g% E$ K( W( s

3 d- S( n$ Q( S9 w3 m3 J( n+ u6 j為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

+ g# H* `/ o0 V1 D
2 Q+ p1 z) u# W! w6 d7 o8 x# T8 T絕對支持啦" T: s* h3 x  D8 z
5 _! L% R0 W5 }+ c: Q5 \2 q+ j" X
有錯就認,打就企定
" T4 t' ^/ X/ Y4 p$ R
8 c' K! e8 V. P9 i6 ^無錯當然要撐到底5 L0 n$ _# a) p. Z* j) L
% a1 Z( X8 E5 Z5 [' W* L! g
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
, t: |) ~1 o) v1 t, A, k6 J2 Z2 ~* n3 e7 {% y
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
% ]2 U4 r3 T( A8 }3 x( K) S2 B; E* ~4 f, l
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力6 u& z8 P2 f# S3 y9 i+ c/ d

# Z& N, j4 o' F5 Z5 D我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生3 b3 I: N2 m7 S* B$ K# ?; e

1 ?( K/ b7 [7 G. y4 t" }+ t唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
! a: }) i! N" C. |) N" M9 A6 }- b: h/ U# e0 ~8 K- i
我唔認為lor
( a4 X$ ?- ~. L7 g! _* [
: L0 |, \& E/ H3 _  l7 F唔係話要整死佢地; i  {* Q- _+ e+ ~5 o1 }4 Y: l

! s' H* B3 z' d2 Y; G7 k而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用& P9 U' q& X5 F* G0 N6 q, e7 C
& m1 I. L7 `9 K
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
- C- [) p& M0 e! a! j2 B2 Z& ~8 r/ x! |+ S
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的9 ]- `) R* H8 S& b

" C  l7 [& Y% S唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由5 d0 x8 t+ c0 Y  E/ w9 b) ]9 S& Q
' L" B* R7 ^' u8 s6 b8 l& b% n
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
3 e( A) m* V  y( T+ g, T- D"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
% N" S$ x3 G( N5 E
( u) J8 t' Z7 ^! O( G/ e5 N我們的大學生
* i4 U( x' s+ J' K7 j* p% H3 O& U/ b/ M+ @
! r4 V: C) T2 T& q9 O

, [! X) z; l9 B9 u; |3 ^2 c. \+ r, d# {  N* L* J

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
6 ?5 B! Z, w# O  D7 V( y- I0 n
+ P) z1 A% J8 m$ e- W) F5 Z8 Y; {
: e* Y  ?8 \$ U9 z5 r; s2 Z有見地 !!!
/ Q, Z$ `% O4 ^; N現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
* y1 g( i% X: p8 x+ \1 F
% n2 H$ m. ^. S4 X' W, tI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
" d/ a" K" E2 k7 NI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 7 g1 [) ]. v2 r7 L: D1 v$ b" U
I pretty sad that about the University official.$ r6 }8 m* I6 F9 u( C
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la1 s) e% ?& P+ e" E. v: |' D
: n% p- @8 w9 B( D
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
! i6 _, a) y$ [5 I我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la2 b) v4 [: G# ~3 I+ d; M) K, N
# b; c  T& ]& i
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

- _6 y2 ^- T, {5 W

8 U. s% M! [/ L) Y: B: G8 F兩者有何分別?1 z" r% b0 {* l$ V8 g1 P9 H
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?