<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)2 _! c# M$ b: q$ g- C! ^. W5 v
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:+ d- N! q5 A* }, |; C, s1 n3 f
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
1 F" C6 `7 h. S% C+ \
I agree you points that it could be illegal4 G# f- |' W8 Z+ Q1 h% _
but that is still a "gray area"
+ S/ F  }7 m: Z( ~/ {6 n  Fwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair' `2 L1 i! F2 s9 t8 p0 J
: j+ k! H! U5 ^5 f
anyway, I want to say that is3 j' ~4 Z1 c( U0 I
who is supposed to be protected by laws3 {1 `: a4 W4 |7 a( b1 m) f& R
creators?8 o+ U  d& m4 n/ Q/ a5 o1 c
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
' U( ]. \" B& |# b* X* e2 s0 Tlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
: `& `* ?! _: ^8 U9 Y& `0 ewhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
9 G& v2 a* k: B5 M0 l# ?Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:: C0 J, R' x2 \" a6 N* x
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
+ Z$ `5 o2 f4 c) p, m
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
  C2 c  {3 N: x0 r
, g) Y# B( |# I  t0 r! X我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
9 H" R2 b" c6 R" H, Z  {0 K唔係喎!+ l( J# e, G( j/ g9 C. t7 ~
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!* j0 I3 L" s  w$ Y$ Z" W1 n/ |
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
# X* w5 S3 g& J佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
/ e& u' _; q) k就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
; e1 ^- {+ s4 J3 e: B( V. }一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
; m5 F  q9 \) V6 P( M' l5 y; k) j* odun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......# y! k3 h  @, z5 ]% r4 P/ p
if so bad, dun download la, right?! e' @+ [6 D% i; T5 k
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
  D; g# s5 ^' M" {+ Zbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct" w9 @* T% D8 n6 v+ b% Q* L3 Z
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
9 Q5 N6 \$ n0 M. ~& e( pso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society4 h" E* \! ]$ R$ K% Q: @
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
, v+ R9 D  D3 hwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
7 Z5 Z  G" r0 ~* Oso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
; E1 U! u! ?  U. j# y佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
$ T2 \  j+ X+ l  [# v& t/ q政府想比下馬威0的人~~2 A0 v9 ?7 a+ i* B
錢就一定罰: F, x  V7 l' S2 P
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,% U+ G% V0 b! Y. j- I" @! ]
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?5 m8 ^5 u) m3 L% b9 G9 ]8 `; L' v
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?0 T5 p- Y) h) j; a
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。