<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)" P7 i3 F( U  ?
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:* W: x) S, P* X! k# x: w
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
& T8 e$ V4 q! h' a$ y
I agree you points that it could be illegal
& G& S$ \, k! p+ i$ Vbut that is still a "gray area"
0 b5 t- O2 O6 M, ]  p- M7 swhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair& y& D7 P3 }! w0 o# Z8 F# E
/ j1 i2 l6 b" ?: v! q$ K
anyway, I want to say that is5 }7 M. q" `' \5 D  B
who is supposed to be protected by laws
  m; i1 ?4 I4 Kcreators?
) I5 i  e8 P* g$ H; bbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market# h. I) k8 u4 X+ U8 L
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.. n  l/ y; ?, f+ i- A$ D
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
, o% K2 Y0 R6 Z: e' yWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:% L# N+ \- `5 v9 h/ Q) ?
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
/ B  A$ H, d6 W3 V
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
/ a. ?( y; \, p# T7 W, z) n3 c4 O  l
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
9 J( a: ]+ Y% q# i+ P. K6 K) f: E+ N唔係喎!
2 k! R) Z( w/ ^9 o古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!. h: n9 [- P; d& q1 c4 B( n
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!0 t# D& E* Z. {9 X/ O7 E: R! d
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!1 o# N8 h3 f" t; b; b2 ^6 j7 z3 w
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
3 v5 p  ?! _6 N. p1 G1 ^8 ^1 y! Z- u" X一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!" R) a0 n5 c$ N9 U, {' k* _
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......." c4 w6 I2 \2 l/ D. I  V2 H
if so bad, dun download la, right?
, ~. F* _2 I; Y0 w* A7 Z" m7 @i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^9 f* R% x2 o8 b3 f1 p. U# {
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
; X4 X1 O: W; `) ^* ~% ^2 ?. Hno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
2 \  \4 C2 U+ ~+ I; K5 {so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society8 e8 b+ b* _- s  r  O" ?: W. y
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
4 m, h" w3 X0 ]( xwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
1 L, n: t; Y% \; Kso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!9 M0 h0 _6 X+ j
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~! X8 s. {. t% R% v/ a
政府想比下馬威0的人~~" ?5 u1 f+ M9 d8 j( a& g/ x
錢就一定罰* N) ^! E( q  _: u
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
& t$ g0 D. x, D, @- g) [唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?( p# e" |8 L# m) H7 }
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?) A( o1 H5 C9 u. Y/ m
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。