奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:3 I  L- e; d# z4 Y4 X

. k+ J1 F% `4 X7 iagree,8 `" `% \9 l; s  n% q! G
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,3 ^( v* z  W- H/ l8 ]# D3 N
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,% Q8 c% u8 E) \
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

# q& {+ \: A8 O1 b5 J: P( w" T- Shttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
0 o, B$ b: ]) a) s& ?2 E  i已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
- G) a7 F  q! Y1 R( e, j搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.7 N, L6 n' l. q/ F( K7 s
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:- d( C% w8 L3 B
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
) h5 b& K' b( g. r# ^
% N, d+ ^9 x7 L# G  d) R係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
* n, L8 X! w) ?6 y$ y- C9 P
+ r2 f0 k1 x3 [5 c8 D為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

# l. f9 S6 f5 s4 v) U& y+ n$ Z; X# m7 G8 l2 {7 E
絕對支持啦
) P8 C, ^+ H6 o8 }" G* j6 L) j% J" R6 c7 y
有錯就認,打就企定" u# S' b8 g/ M9 u& U. z2 ^& k/ ~
; T+ d) g/ A4 e2 L6 e) M- m3 ?
無錯當然要撐到底
- M6 [! w3 r7 b4 U7 p  T- e6 }$ h; x( t+ {/ l7 _, s
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
# i3 \; I/ g% b: b; x6 w! L* x% a3 z. [* F0 X
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得& D- u; F0 z0 ]
7 r3 H+ g* r; Y7 |. C' D* ^3 |
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
4 T0 f1 U  P/ {! ?8 V3 n' L# B1 S7 ]6 V2 q
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
. }/ H/ X# x( |. V' Z/ ~, l% A4 n; P; N4 {; i2 D
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?( d. T; ^: n5 E! I& N- e
1 y* j# {# W# W0 a
我唔認為lor8 M  f" d9 w, U; J
4 q6 F( h! c8 P
唔係話要整死佢地
# d0 F: M6 N6 R0 q
6 D# S/ z1 R/ W. b! [8 w而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
7 e1 r7 p8 ~5 ?$ z" ^; _$ _  U" P; t7 S; @
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
! J& P: ~& \7 Q7 U; S( v' U/ B! h: V# U8 a
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的3 K/ ~* M0 E4 P
* h" j7 N/ H) U  ?9 U0 X1 ?0 Q
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由  c. s5 `9 I+ S1 G  o

+ n- {% f$ _1 C0 s0 s大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句" S. V4 P% [! c0 O
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
0 S" N* D' f# @" E) L2 y' x# Q- D! f0 F* }: `% D( p- Q
我們的大學生
# p* I0 m1 T; Z! `. p! M5 n: h# i" i3 w" H- p" R7 n
4 e/ c! p; \6 Y; D3 c# }
3 ]8 l. x2 t$ Q  @
3 O4 B8 C: u6 D3 t( f* U3 S

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
" a' ^7 r& E. b9 A* e/ H4 d: U1 q& n; v+ z+ t3 P  ?; t
+ Z$ ~# z/ c; h
有見地 !!!9 w$ }5 V* V! y3 B
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html( [/ S% q/ ]' X7 K  H% Q+ z
8 v+ l& }4 i+ k5 m. o+ x
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
) {+ K1 i/ c2 f6 z/ J4 tI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
0 P- _* g/ W; t, x: \2 Y0 |3 b! ZI pretty sad that about the University official.
' M, R* V+ l1 C- o  I  uIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la$ i! ~" Z7 _* K6 b5 x
6 c3 T0 l  }) b: h* U8 s
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
. k, w) [) _7 {3 v4 l: l我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
4 c: W9 E2 I" M7 [; J/ h! z! P: M0 [  d. W9 F: V9 @
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

/ d! f" P' ^, F6 h* h3 I

! G% L# `! w! V+ @兩者有何分別?* R- D# i) s9 E  E
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?