Rika

由最好排到最壞
5 P1 x! z) I' _1 R! ?  P7 ^8 o, q1 fF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong8 V4 _+ }. i9 s
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount/ H& V3 L7 W3 g9 Y8 S
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her& C1 f' \0 l1 r. ]( s- n
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure+ d2 y0 b! t7 B4 i& P
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:# V5 t, r# T, B" u: X; H
# G1 i1 t, c: A/ }. o2 {+ k, W
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
3 Y9 V/ b6 G  Q' V) N% ~: r3 ]& F( o( X% I/ j. C. u1 T
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事). P+ Y/ d" J3 ~9 J& O2 b
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!/ ]2 R" X) C4 a/ v1 {; C1 h
- N0 r# y& L; L! I
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
+ P) p2 [  J* [
$ |! \6 D& c) G/ \# g( dL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
7 a$ G' s0 Y/ ^8 c/ J, X' n. u) g5 q
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
) N2 Q5 N' l% f5 t     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
( _1 ]6 m1 s& N* N- O! [$ y& i1 q- d+ C- G2 b# M3 }/ |+ W
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案1 x; A5 G$ N- ]- M0 I
而家答多次9 |/ T' f  P  G% {% y
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
) A  C+ H2 E" ml: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
# `+ {& l4 Z& ?" f5 }: Db: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
: Y( Z2 S8 h0 P( z4 V( n% k6 os: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
2 K  ]+ q+ R5 H+ c- Dm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S9 T1 [3 n7 c2 o
4 E! v5 K( |0 w1 K2 N4 J  C
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
* P9 `* n2 n1 Z: @F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
( K$ v' C0 h: y4 sM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒) ]5 y' |# Z) e/ Q$ l( n+ g
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢0 }3 d# J) t) N! y' p7 G% p
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
9 G: S& B3 @: X4 ?* e  `$ d* SF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默", N8 K5 U/ F+ G' ~4 ~8 Z
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
3 [$ w7 G. s+ c/ nM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法0 m3 Q; n& H; g6 g: N7 i6 O
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果5 C0 f% U- |1 P0 S
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
+ {% V  H1 C6 x( V1 M: l# y6 W! D7 j! P: [" r- X7 \
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
8 v. O( l& }* L8 I# X/ IL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
9 R, M; G. S& m7 b8 Z  o' aB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘$ z4 @0 V" E9 [  D
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
8 K! _9 A; E  A3 _% S; d0 n& L( P; vF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
5 N4 F- H: j% k: C0 \% mM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

8 u) M5 o  G: {1 v$ t. v
: s6 V+ V$ h9 R3 C& t0 G/ F8 [ same choices with u , but want to add some comments
/ T- @) m# e  s  Q# u1 T; c  x/ v% d; _
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
* {9 j% m# \3 L
% p# h) b% @) ?7 `2 DS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
5 Y) K3 F3 m+ L/ a) g4 K( B) f8 \! J  B9 H4 P7 A$ N
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
0 K3 u& x+ C0 u/ C1 x1 t: O& v: l3 }5 A3 K
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......; a- N9 r# S" q6 G2 x
8 V8 U5 |3 m3 W; |; U
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge; H; ]1 L/ [$ _1 f) m% C* F* |
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢4 N- C3 H9 P% r1 Q6 d5 [
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
$ g0 F* L6 }; Y; v0 i  ]; L4 DF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
: U. z% X% J! R' v4 W! ~0 P7 ?1 f7 u+ R$ r- B% L1 h8 V
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....$ h7 e1 f! u- K3 I- y, h1 |
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
, w  {! H: T+ {& J) V由最好開始排起既話，
& j. L" F, S' L7 Z+ GL B M F S 啦，; Z" d4 E7 M( @, S

* s# m9 k" d/ Z9 t* A: e6 F/ W其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，" e/ o1 P: d6 A+ u4 y$ F) v
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
" o0 T8 r+ x) s! E! v如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
; e5 {* _$ R) Z% k# o又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
: }$ ?7 w# ~* h% T# u! W
% H: ]4 [# u' }+ N: M而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，4 C0 H7 v* G9 k2 q! N1 R
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，- l+ Q" z7 E: f1 y* W
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。* j- C7 p5 d2 S3 I1 L4 _9 L
( I0 u* `# G3 ~" n# Y
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
) ~( e7 B- g' s M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
! @7 G; R% I- S- W+ {% y亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
: g( `( b5 u' k, U知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，) t: y) a7 _. E' D; H
M 都可算壞了。/ l6 l6 h7 Q8 ~) m
  y" {1 d/ d0 @5 n
F 呢個人仲掂，+ R' d& _; g5 w$ j) A8 H# l# W. c
知道既唔等於要講，
5 Z- p1 J% {2 H" X+ @: _/ g8 W如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
. F; z) Q0 k9 y% W我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。7 s& Y% Q* p& r  ]5 C* O
" |6 T2 M5 r! |0 `- k
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，0 m% t9 F/ p! l% n& B4 F3 W! H
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。6 D) Z8 [* y' L% I1 Z

# T! e! v% X; x4 E- L3 W! d: j
. @/ G4 }6 j) O4 u1 U5 U) `
( c( ^. w* S3 C8 K題外話：  N( D3 m# e; g0 [, \! z/ n
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
- _6 l" m2 `( I睇到 S 呢條友，! G0 p: w1 V7 s% ~: n' ?
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
! @- p0 M% g# V( R) k$ R# B, [/ V, z8 @
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!. P  x8 G0 r+ Q; V" F4 R
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
! @5 ~# a: R: X3 {$ c# ]) I. C" A" j5 uM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她- P* A/ l1 Q7 o& N' }. J$ c  K% g
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害* W# _. X. j; j- E+ U& }( M
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...