Rika

由最好排到最壞
" [3 K: ~& r3 F' J$ J6 T. WF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
" V: A+ m6 j" \" a+ rB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount9 h8 s5 c6 l- K% [, N# w# [
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her; V& Q: d3 q2 K+ f; `1 Z5 d
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure! X$ r8 B* w1 ^5 f3 H: p* c1 _, ^
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
% n1 T7 r+ `5 _5 |) J
+ Z1 |$ Z  B3 RM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人! k3 H# I6 ^& H. ~$ J  C9 k! ]8 G

. k6 r1 D$ E' d* n* E: P. cS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)0 w: c( u5 b0 J5 X4 _8 |- @6 q
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!6 \. A0 x- H  T5 w

3 Z6 s& \9 W) o' b7 ?* r2 |1 Q( U: t1 c7 AB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
4 h( R& O; _9 Z9 b5 w2 X. |+ O5 l" F$ T& P# h: s$ ~
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
( H) L/ [/ i- K$ z1 C- Y3 Z
) _& Z% p5 f& L) d. CF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,2 R8 X$ N4 z6 S! r: e- Y
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
+ r8 N: l: y/ \4 y
4 ^) _8 F, g. v5 m+ \0 j[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
, p6 `( l- ?* k: ]3 \而家答多次
8 `" F9 X0 x" ?f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽8 A( y2 H# _) R1 t$ y# Z
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
) p' a% l, r  R  m6 E0 }$ \, sb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
0 o4 T* x/ I; Q/ P: x6 F4 hs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.7 c  o( n2 }% P! v! {1 j2 r! H( w
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
' u$ |+ h- p, m6 N2 |) x$ H% m  c7 V2 @# S
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
9 y. p; K0 n, W- b! uF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
3 P0 S5 l  [0 w1 N7 C& l0 rM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒; t& u$ M+ W+ q1 K# Z* ^  a
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
4 \9 M' |8 W+ _* k; ZB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
7 Z- P1 t8 [- ^6 o2 \+ vF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
# j) k2 f9 h  B- qS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
% G6 L# T" z% _8 DM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
& I; F( m4 B/ {& pL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果: C0 c& m7 u* C0 T' O4 z
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情/ m# R. Q2 Z2 N+ ?3 }) F

. @  f; B1 M6 \! W! _9 v世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
0 V/ `$ Y& b' |! z; I3 J; n3 w* j) G# TL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
$ O0 \0 |5 t* }( C: L2 eB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘" \- a; j3 z: q% l8 |
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件. }. D  F$ Z0 ~
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方- [5 q" _5 ?' R, F& Z" X: r1 r
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

! \4 n6 @4 i: f+ E" J
. _, z# x. @6 \* l7 @7 c* K same choices with u , but want to add some comments . E/ [$ V% t; D" ^3 V0 s& ]
8 [9 ?7 J9 A3 o1 o+ Q
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  3 w: z: |9 t1 n" l7 T& ~+ {% A. O

" Y7 Z( D4 p3 t; D/ vS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
# M$ s& b( L) X/ c
  L, \7 o" v, q* C6 \5 G$ r' \F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
: G0 [5 _' @5 v+ _
( t6 D, [9 S4 h) `- f% LM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
6 s& R$ y, a/ P! S
1 C; J' T3 D- O* Q9 A' B[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
$ \8 d" C" h1 e; g1 n2 r5 A) T1 LM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
$ @. M0 P3 C' tL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
+ e* D: M8 V3 a0 uF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
5 B- e# N/ g% y+ S  ]3 u" s  t% Y1 }2 b& m
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
% k, I6 |6 c- ?) H/ S$ I  m有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
6 S1 Q* l' `4 @由最好開始排起既話，8 {6 p( K/ X( l$ D$ m3 X% `
L B M F S 啦，
8 r9 ]* X% ^1 o$ d9 I" m5 u2 Y9 }8 E7 P  T5 ^, R9 b* k, R
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
% i& I/ @% u2 Y" u) s8 n但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
, B( _$ X0 X0 E如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？; t* _) v! e+ p& ~
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。; }; m6 b1 [5 d4 t) \& C
3 m2 S4 p4 B4 W, b2 _1 i
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
/ D* |( m! Q7 F5 G- Y# |! b, G所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，6 L7 X' h" g- q8 h( O% \6 w6 I
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。9 K% ~9 z9 K' m' h6 A" H" a

4 p* e: }7 `' w0 W" }而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
/ F9 s" K  M1 {+ u9 ?. K M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，4 x$ u$ X! y. W" f5 |! Y
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* s* \$ h, |, E7 C
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，* }% n7 `/ S% w8 p, ~
M 都可算壞了。! i" |9 Y$ u$ k  U

2 T0 ^! d3 Y. P2 J F 呢個人仲掂，$ R3 X  z+ w7 X. H& _- j
知道既唔等於要講，+ P1 S# N  D) H7 z) k
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，' k, y& p& ?6 G7 P5 k
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。# C; S1 l* A/ c( e# I& r; r9 }! B

+ ^% }! d5 M- \% D最衰個個緊係 S 啦，2 A! A5 O* s1 {- d3 h
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。8 E2 G3 j' [) M8 p2 U

7 E, ?! n8 D2 F* |, J! u
. a& D6 e0 B* _5 I! W' v: T8 Z- [! E. ]* r* F# g% N5 l- b
題外話：- U+ ?/ h- A, |) Q
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
& I7 A. Q) ~4 H6 K4 R睇到 S 呢條友，
: w5 `* y- c6 w# \9 @1 P8 H* o5 e$ u我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L) j$ }+ @' n7 ~2 m9 Z5 T. b6 @9 [" U
( k- `+ V+ j% \" d* z! j0 ]4 S* H
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!3 x. |3 I8 F$ ?% l+ {
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係' @# D9 s( J' y' T/ v. {6 |
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
' J; Z9 x# A! J* A3 S7 P+ ]& B% }B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
0 Q4 p. {& k& ^. C' r+ |L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...