Rika

由最好排到最壞! K1 n+ W+ t* O2 ]2 T2 Z  u( o* _
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
# n8 Y" ]# }, E3 h5 {B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
- P! y1 {7 `9 s- f! p% D. w) sS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her- @. V6 \  q( ]: n) j3 d
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure* y/ L9 A+ ?! X/ X" I1 B4 R
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
" t  l5 K0 E* r4 r( l+ Y) M) s, s, Y" R" K5 Z
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人9 K: x" B2 ~; a7 b; H

* ~' J2 @  B) Q% pS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)0 }7 y  o' p; D: K, H7 |
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!# w# G4 p& m  @" L
' {5 Q( p) H6 p, g9 g
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
4 F4 n3 |' b# N& L
7 w, @. m* e+ n* R  IL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志  g. j6 d; [! M  p* l0 B

5 G1 |) A+ ^3 g5 k& |4 ]+ YF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
" h# B: j) Y/ f( G6 g1 G     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好0 N! D  D) e+ s6 }& l; T( F3 v
4 R8 {" a5 G" v: j: V6 w: N
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
3 s9 ?5 g2 ^6 ?9 d0 [而家答多次
9 I; P1 |) v/ Df: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
, Q3 ^. E3 T' ]6 k) al: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架+ R# P3 B3 t" r1 J4 L
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
' g& e" z! P/ m: es: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願., x) u* x0 N7 Q% [) L
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S3 i4 f8 T, U/ H" ^- H4 e" {
( J1 \, F4 ^8 v/ ^4 y
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大) H- [# Y. F- Y% c6 I
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度6 ?2 m. o2 o4 b, ~# ~+ z8 q2 B
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
6 m" r; R3 z  V6 E% }9 Q4 WS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
1 Q) [8 M0 ^% q' R5 _B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
; U5 k  U' p+ W$ q; M, rF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"& K: y. [7 M2 ]9 ~. u
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
1 E, {6 E4 T' KM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
. H2 A1 M( f. N' \' F' G: g1 OL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果2 y2 H% X# \, c: r
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
# S4 Y4 o0 T. l- u1 @# _" A) O1 h! Y+ y: H0 t% w0 S8 j
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
% M/ f" h* }7 {" x# j5 Y. x, j) YL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
. ~& X8 k( n. W* y4 a: k2 SB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘1 T. Y% _# o! b1 a6 U  U; n2 V
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件# s: k) x# ~: G
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方8 F# p2 }/ ^- _' d8 Z" s9 E8 a
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

; d, @! @" f, U  x7 T" z2 K9 ?8 Y$ O, n9 w+ ]7 N& K
same choices with u , but want to add some comments / E/ W) [0 H" d& X9 M$ P) M1 g
; O4 o" g7 |4 h, \
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
. Z: x/ j  a3 z9 }8 D
4 [" Z! t" W9 [) W* n* }, f) RS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )7 u( i, y% Z8 c" {( S

' _: `" I2 ?) GF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
) V, R7 s' L  ]- }- l" V4 \! U# D; N7 o# M- K- s9 d) o6 k$ s
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
! X; u. D% p+ ~: T7 c7 L, u: h9 B: H) E5 ?7 k8 q2 O$ s- e  l- {$ c
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge+ k" y/ s8 Z0 ]6 Y
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢' N4 v1 `% e1 G. ?+ N$ \
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
) l8 _. j) F7 I4 lF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
9 K- D: P) L4 ?1 @. p
) b6 C0 y# E) M! P  O最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....  k# E0 z1 |2 W$ a3 z
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
- o- n6 ^; K. f2 v/ {- l, E由最好開始排起既話，; l, }" S+ S' S. W
L B M F S 啦，
6 c8 t* \! Y: O+ p' a% V  F+ U  c' o) r$ E# B
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，; i( M0 `# P) @" j; s  O
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？+ U: ?. b. F' B* a4 z/ Y; c
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
6 x! \- M2 Y& K. O) g又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。) x6 i  a, b  i. \

/ c; U3 r# Y. ?* J4 W% _' v而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
) k, h6 e+ [- m! g8 {) G' Y7 N7 k所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
* h/ u* W3 k1 h" B' a明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
. u) ~% ], |) f8 U$ v& m3 U# j) V. J
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
" D, ~+ k; H* i" n/ ]# r4 ?3 C M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
2 d" k9 x) C4 B亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* o! J. d5 l- I+ k# s- o8 r  D1 x
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，' f7 C6 w- u  @0 _2 \/ G
M 都可算壞了。: z2 V; `6 N" [0 C; R

. c2 y# V# I  m; y  _% C" o F 呢個人仲掂，
1 J3 W; [; S  ^知道既唔等於要講，
( V; q* N# n* o# n如果呢件事發生係自己身上，" B# U8 ?& A# r+ I
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
) K8 ?' v$ t8 {! h+ H# E' a& T0 l& R. ~5 m" j' a1 c9 [
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
* S3 h& _% \# l5 X- F- g始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。& I* u  M* Z& B2 s6 x5 F! ^' l

( z$ I; e+ L. K& E1 ?# O7 P7 D5 X! L' U5 ?/ C; E3 q

' N( [9 |" R2 D& R! s+ z3 T題外話：
6 |  C! y5 ~5 M. H" r唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，) V4 J; H4 {/ z( H! E
睇到 S 呢條友，4 u: K6 r! `8 q& f+ g
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
- S# q9 O! S1 q7 x2 ~& G/ S
* w4 g% e3 A- v+ s8 ?: e+ Z4 x' zS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!/ N9 H  |4 ^; J8 f. r6 |
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
4 ]$ _: D/ j: n  ?* z- zM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她8 O" ~* n0 b3 a5 g+ P
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
. z5 x0 t! w- C4 z3 h. OL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...