Rika

由最好排到最壞
9 Y! {) u. g& A) T  AF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong& i" B4 s7 p/ G$ @/ Q3 l; _
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount' F! y. v: K, C/ g
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
0 d" m% i. P0 r; A  ~( W# bM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure" N; {. `" K6 W" i. b& V4 J& l
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
) N  o5 l) z6 s% E+ U3 D! v5 v. e; Q9 ^7 Z8 p' M5 c* B
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人5 l2 B2 y* Y. b9 Q2 n- Q

  h2 @# r4 A" ^- iS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事): Q* r; _7 p( H! L1 Y  [# r) b
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
1 c$ \  v* ~, t3 U& y- m1 j( D$ P) u# m8 m. q! p0 [8 K0 f6 X* }! X
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做) E7 g1 q- P  L$ o8 P1 x9 ^9 f
; C' @7 |! T$ ]+ m7 Z3 v; _: r$ ]
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志5 F& W7 r$ z; ]* u6 i
; N; z1 @. o2 x
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
# ~& Q/ H- e* Y3 `9 A2 ~     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好% T- Z/ ~1 ?: x' E
0 u1 ]! ]5 C3 B5 `5 {4 Y: X4 @7 f
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
5 }8 a3 q+ u9 ]3 c' F; [, g) P而家答多次
  R+ A* E: ^# v- s2 _' p  }7 Of: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
1 x+ K( C8 ~% Y0 T4 ]l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
7 O2 [" k2 U; Y- g' i/ Z$ s) rb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
" D. _& H8 @* G$ e; ^s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.! ]6 @+ D  o# c. k8 L
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S( \+ _; g. z; u
+ T6 W9 o! t4 q& h7 n
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
: S9 v( @0 ~! ?F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
3 S7 A( C, @* k$ UM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
- Q2 \$ G3 P: r# M2 e$ SS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢% R' C$ h: a" \3 e
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
. \4 p* M2 P9 y/ eF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
. |) D( D5 _) Z) E3 pS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取+ e& v: e' N3 w; _# h% U5 C
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法7 Z5 f2 W6 V; S& c. j
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果$ l5 s' Q3 k# [; K& e8 b3 f
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情3 X, r2 [0 v: V3 Z. a
2 B& T  g  h3 }
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
' D" `9 S( @9 P& N! o# t5 O2 ?L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
4 E, O; v2 A5 P! J& {  \$ @B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘) H: C; P: L8 c+ ~
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件, e: n8 h0 s3 o, r
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方4 H6 P3 {- d9 i! N4 o& e
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ k5 d7 C/ A2 K6 \7 x, H- q6 o+ t
3 X" Q. b  d+ ~* v) t, R
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 4 |( v* r; @. H& `  ]5 S3 j

2 ^5 i# w$ T1 `) A; X6 W: BB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  ( U0 k5 P6 |3 M1 F' B  r

" X- l  g/ ?3 J5 r/ HS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
: o3 U$ }+ O$ k: L4 R9 o1 z6 b% l6 h
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome % ^) S0 Q- F# ~# J
0 A# L) z; |, i! u7 f- [
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
: |  q% V) M* Q, f1 L; ?! y8 S) c! T0 e) P+ F8 f: b( e
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
/ o/ }" ^$ G) D+ oM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
% L* X$ L* \: B  B% IL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
. V+ J" Y' O+ [  B2 o1 _+ {F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
; _7 g) x5 q6 B. H% u' F6 N( x! s( E* q4 ?2 S: w, }
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....0 L6 h( t- B$ H5 s* M0 G4 m
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
8 F. G" P7 E7 i由最好開始排起既話，
( G/ \6 J, j; w3 Y8 Q. ML B M F S 啦，; v4 \# j: t3 L8 L3 f9 q9 a! G! d. _
7 G" [! V2 o* |% D% A0 ^
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
: B" Q8 {" Q; ]4 i但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
9 p: \- ~5 X5 g- J+ M' f如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？. m$ m! z7 p% W8 C) r; b* s
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
/ ^+ |' p% q( @/ Q' |+ r' V+ B, d: ^7 @0 X9 H7 Q
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
2 q4 N& W  @8 q7 e7 Q+ g6 i: U所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
9 ^3 [* ^9 i5 j明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
- D) k' K6 K& i
+ Q- S2 M9 p- p9 o; \$ l( L3 }/ a% @而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
( u! h! B+ R1 j0 e! b$ I$ K M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，: a+ @: y, Q' d/ j9 m+ ?$ Z
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，8 f- k8 ~" g! ]& u; ~( ^6 c
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，6 i$ ~: H; V1 V" k2 o2 ~% s  ^7 U
M 都可算壞了。3 G# g' c$ D5 r% p

1 v8 a+ H; q5 x6 t8 K. v. V F 呢個人仲掂，" s3 z; d1 R1 n* e7 W
知道既唔等於要講，3 q8 l9 V) v8 b$ W3 T; ?" T" O# ?
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，  R9 m2 n7 P7 G6 {
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。: B$ ?. ^* z. X
, O% v* u0 q& v4 n8 a! {! E, h- U( t
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
2 f" s! q' G; ~7 _+ r" F) C始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
5 Y! g+ L$ j: Y9 ~+ E( T0 s3 W8 B7 H

6 @# c4 F6 \# r% _  P% @. H% M2 G4 n3 _$ ?/ ~. U
題外話：
9 Q$ @8 }( f0 J" J唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，' D% P; Y9 D' \/ R3 ?, n
睇到 S 呢條友，5 U7 W+ q3 J9 Z* x0 e
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L2 l) A) ^5 W+ z/ c! a: x" i
5 Y. `; i% c" M+ y% l
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
+ \3 _; [- ]: j( m) {9 iF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
( d; o+ z  @7 b- _4 Q9 k" aM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
9 D7 O& b/ [5 `: s! N  yB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
0 W( S3 L- S. G3 ~4 PL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...