Rika

由最好排到最壞
- n: U# `9 R5 }9 lF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong, W- W& ~: u* m- D8 I
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount# h' E6 [7 s8 G# S# y
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
% g) d) c! G$ ?) XM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure6 h- a) N& Y' H
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:/ g- k& e2 d# g& C
8 n9 \$ {/ L3 B2 G) Y
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
. a4 {9 N! D% m9 J! p
5 G8 I& c7 U6 T, G1 W3 eS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)9 X4 x' y: F0 n1 {/ w1 ~
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!# T8 _1 ]0 h2 I( w

, n4 f% l$ I4 A: ?, r) TB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做, E; \& p) m2 j; E3 _, \/ U7 X
9 z. I2 s; J! Z3 W
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
. `) p) f3 M% M/ ~+ E! l/ u# @- T+ k
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
4 T; f; z5 F# E' N0 w     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
# K6 |4 d& a1 F* A: \2 w% S" g% b- Q) m7 _
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
! `& ]+ e$ P3 q. n+ l而家答多次
. a, h! p8 R' W% j: U* Z2 h) t  ?f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
7 w5 Q) y' u( q9 T* j: \) El: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
5 E" g) B3 f! h9 J0 L+ sb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢; T. x# k) V: |
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.  l8 E6 a# z+ ~2 Z* t; F" U$ n
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
/ ^- }, c8 P/ ^+ T1 ^/ y
, n1 `: s. r' V% VL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大" z7 F4 p9 n# v0 t4 T/ y
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
5 [/ v  s* q4 T/ F4 M  fM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒0 m" P7 g* j8 E* x) B% }/ h
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢2 C' V% n! ]9 M: N$ [3 k
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
& _- g3 b% ]3 g5 d' [9 x9 F2 \F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"8 O5 C7 s5 `8 ^  A8 [
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取3 ^1 k. e7 X! \  m0 u# m
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
8 X( F7 u5 S- p/ V% |/ U  A) TL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果8 @) P$ q& J9 X. M2 I7 O' D( F
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
; g5 [2 A& }) U" k% Z; h
& _4 Q+ a7 ]5 E: j- n# g世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
# b$ p+ b1 b5 E( hL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己" ?4 U+ |6 ?6 J2 w  i
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
' O# Q1 c- j: ]( u6 ZS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件. V- C" i( g) r/ d1 x# u
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
* o6 B# N& w8 g/ X8 UM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

6 {" d1 G+ B6 o! g* [
2 U5 r9 O5 J; m( ]+ |0 ^+ E same choices with u , but want to add some comments 7 z5 D+ y+ w2 _
0 v, p8 k  E3 c- a% F
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
/ \% q( t' u0 C
6 s7 J* K" G+ c0 u. oS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
0 P" d- X; F, S6 V, b/ U+ R9 c2 a& i6 F
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome   b( J+ d, E6 z1 M2 e( N" n# \

4 I( x5 i* c: O( V0 t- W6 H  ZM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
7 O8 x9 f' Z6 j) P  |2 A. r* [) ~; T7 j5 T3 q
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge/ F3 h" ?, b1 K/ X0 N/ v3 R
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
' n' l+ D5 q6 w6 A/ tL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
4 c, T' @( N, w3 |F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma$ W, t1 `! v+ Q: s0 b: t
0 {# T+ b8 }5 s5 h, D) h4 ?
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....9 _: X4 s% v) a- E
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，# {2 s% O. F. Q5 j/ p
由最好開始排起既話，
& Q( @0 o" r& R) O8 VL B M F S 啦，
5 j. y: u/ e0 c5 `9 q9 S+ \1 B, e+ j, f( g$ j$ E5 o5 m2 U2 e- H" K
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
' @. j1 n" c) t, N- z但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？% e9 `6 Z" [+ A
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？4 Z( l( F" d: \* A8 w( P# U
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
# Q2 C  S3 I! C" Z
# D6 i- v' N* M" ~7 U而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
! z4 m4 D. l4 b  q0 G1 U所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，5 g0 h4 J' O3 g) H  W; p, Q
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
4 m3 K" `/ b/ b2 F9 h+ b( X# l. N- g7 w, b" ^; J: I
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，$ [. h! x" ?# ^0 ?4 T6 {+ \
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
# g* Q& h% ~* M& k0 H亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* ^* [& n7 q9 \5 x" a
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
6 o  c+ u0 i- K4 H M 都可算壞了。
2 o+ n3 @$ ^$ b) S
$ `0 k$ v6 ~4 L0 R* V) I F 呢個人仲掂，
9 U- |" U: [1 J* i+ F8 S知道既唔等於要講，
6 T5 K0 ^# v8 M如果呢件事發生係自己身上，+ h0 `9 c/ U: |$ I" s5 T: q
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
* l) f0 U! Y! S* z" [1 b
0 E: G' s! ], x( a$ O! [6 [( }最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
0 J7 g; \# z2 b$ q始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
+ M' R0 I6 ^3 [1 z- h9 ~1 S
3 A3 U$ a: \) e0 ~
3 W; \  y% x  P' U- s; e1 E: \1 W" s) Q! V
題外話：  U5 q9 R* q. Y) T+ V
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，: f, c- {, r# ~
睇到 S 呢條友，
( \- x& W9 ~5 |我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
1 Q7 [% z$ A" N9 O1 ^: N
' T0 ]1 h' A( AS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
* }1 u' N. z3 V9 \: IF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係) b* j8 {  s6 D5 ^$ I' u1 @
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
: Q; |; h# c5 j- Z9 mB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害4 t+ H% [2 X, n& y
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...