奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
& X! B& H3 C2 b1 J& e6 h
) C! P) q9 y; K. a9 c: @agree,
$ ]3 {  D7 G; T: s' `我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,  g2 p5 P0 X* U
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
2 l# O0 N. j. L期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

& a( y- G, z: r$ O! g5 }http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html8 r: T* D: M6 V5 Q  B* w  I, V
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地! u/ b2 j4 i& p# \3 p4 s' R7 o
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.# P$ h' ?( e- ]- A. B8 Y. g2 c
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:" ?! L, Q+ L4 Y' S
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ; `! L" i9 o6 M6 z  E  q+ m- L) {

% O+ ]6 `1 V% ]係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???  Q% Y* ]; @1 u) V, d% n* i5 @

* V; W) Q) t" _9 ~9 A為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

  B9 G4 V. S6 d
! l  J  w6 w" l% m
絕對支持啦  L, i4 D4 I: u# [

7 N4 p2 }$ i* }) y( E有錯就認,打就企定
  X( E, F; l$ y" t8 s5 s% q& C$ S, s. p/ x
無錯當然要撐到底; a3 U6 f8 U" u6 ?1 @  ^& J8 s

. I' j* d& J, Z+ S- `0 d0 H但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩8 S5 H' W7 c1 n4 S

1 {- Y8 U, g9 k0 B; p在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
. e; B; Z. P3 R
9 X5 T0 h; P4 O7 L一份公眾讀物係好有影響力/ i  n1 m) m& b& T8 ~

2 W( K( B0 W0 m- d  u! [" w我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
( }8 j* x# x$ s/ R. t% S5 h9 \% U
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
8 M( b7 K1 D8 \' }+ a: b1 ?% {: @5 e1 m+ E" x  @9 B) x
我唔認為lor
4 O" s" f6 R2 L, V$ M7 S; U: ^4 ~8 ^  M1 Q0 L
唔係話要整死佢地: j, O9 k3 n2 |; V0 j0 F4 W
; w& Z8 ~. s+ [1 A
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
. V: p; s0 G: j# Y* i5 ~$ k( @
$ T. `3 K/ @% n- K2 E1 R  u/ v我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大6 h/ i$ r# Q# g& {
4 ^; p% B9 _2 ?2 Y) p
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
' t- g6 c. }6 E0 u) P5 [6 P2 m" q$ A0 O
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
( r2 H, s" g2 }" H. E
1 w( }" {6 a/ D0 t; l大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
  ^7 O' O) `/ \! `# I2 w"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
4 p, C4 i1 W5 j2 A  h' n7 R! h0 v* j! N2 \) e1 f. t
我們的大學生0 J+ V! A* b! ?  l! F8 F5 f. [
" Y, u' J$ k3 e- _6 n

! N: n) `9 w) A$ J' f% V3 x/ C% B
2 F$ E3 A1 b% e# i& W

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:0 W' t4 j. T1 t7 }% Y. Y0 x
8 z! h7 K' l& h. g4 Z% X$ Y3 F

  m: u  G+ s% q有見地 !!!
% R: y2 c$ D6 D( s. d現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html& K4 t3 x0 `* \1 c0 c; _
7 n7 f/ t- c+ S. Y  `# o; ^0 S
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.   I8 ^% `4 o4 [$ b( `" v, f
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ' {& U! }- d# Z5 ~* G
I pretty sad that about the University official., ~* Z# X: s" P/ X
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
4 z0 W' s3 A/ K: ~% I/ T) Y. F8 Q" ~2 m) p) t
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
$ \5 h( y# n5 m2 |; D! {% r& s我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la. {# R. r) K; i" q

% d; C$ m6 q# a: x, I( ?[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

" `) A. j+ Y+ f$ T
2 N0 Y* W( e( f# {* N1 R0 t1 B
兩者有何分別?
0 [4 d& W7 m: o7 }0 H中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?