|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct. M) y; g2 i% E7 {; i
/ K4 g5 [! l. Q+ Y4 n
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
9 E" A$ ~9 n) f3 x7 _% B
* Z6 A, S) V6 n2 {In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
+ ]' V4 f$ V( t2 D/ e- rand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.1 d! b0 c. V4 q$ K, e9 F; q
/ [# }9 r, g( F( d' A
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險9 I, F9 a4 T* c" U+ |
- V6 E; T Q2 E$ t" J7 k
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 7 [4 ]; s( w( {$ R
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|