奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:( L  o8 R! N6 w

$ k5 o% k+ D% i7 }/ e7 g; [  b, Ragree,# I# @7 O5 D6 i  ]1 }7 j0 x8 n
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
/ w# C3 {4 j, f$ n: @- A) y但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
, h, F' I. X0 I/ n0 I9 n" N期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

7 b- Q! @, [, Q
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html$ @/ g0 Z5 O% N8 c
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地6 t" e, U1 ^2 ?6 C7 J( x4 }/ J  n
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
* V. p! F' s* k% |& `% `Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:5 O7 w; _$ e- [, J, h, t: @# e! W
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
5 `$ e* ~) a7 u$ G% m) o- W
, q% a* F  q9 _, z( L( S6 B) o- e& @5 y係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???+ s3 }' N: X7 |3 L6 Y
* E! y, q* q/ S" ]' n6 w7 _7 V# n
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

) v0 T5 Q5 a9 R3 `( D7 J

6 z% x8 D9 ^3 a% [絕對支持啦
. }* p& u- d, ?7 R. P2 S: Y/ M4 Y: w( q; {' N9 [
有錯就認,打就企定
! N, I, @" X/ s$ P  a; C! d
. d; k/ ~5 V# l無錯當然要撐到底
2 A5 Y9 n3 O1 E2 M
# @' q3 G! e; U; Z; q1 P" \; U但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩6 ]6 i0 m$ g# ^6 J
, o! M! R8 F3 G. q* Y
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得& c/ M8 G' a8 F  ]3 e" P1 y

" I" P) {# I0 Q( ]2 _一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
' E/ I; K- D* J% Z" S/ h
/ ^, y. g2 A1 h5 m) g我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生, H4 K: n9 W/ B, ?/ a

$ c9 ?, p4 Q7 V' Y唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
' v1 r) r/ R* p1 X# g4 g+ i! T8 ~* A1 E# }- G' z- \
我唔認為lor2 W2 Z. S1 l1 H5 E' m
9 s0 ^6 H# A0 S: o$ B" S
唔係話要整死佢地5 m6 c0 K7 M" R" P* Q

5 [( F9 D7 i% K% b3 u而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用9 p8 d3 U" J7 }+ i: a- H3 W1 M

2 _! y# N9 v" C; a1 M) T4 i% I0 Y我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大+ n+ k" ?& W- O& B
9 D4 r4 [& n! p$ i4 [7 h; i
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
2 _: h& g: g$ c4 o
4 C9 g. J* q2 r# U, k唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由% A1 C5 {) \5 k( w

  g& e# r/ Q& f: T/ t大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
2 n: F4 v& T9 o! x"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
" ]( l2 o+ y4 L" a" p* B  \5 G& f" U6 R7 l% V& S: p+ i3 f6 N' ~
我們的大學生
/ `& u# s9 j3 X
5 u6 R" R( X6 ]8 N9 j! F9 ]( E% S4 L" ?5 q( m: L# N
! V$ w# a& G8 X2 G& j' x& V

# C) H. w: r8 O- ^6 q7 W

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:5 T( ~# Y# U" t4 \

# ^/ [( m: \3 \! {7 e. o: p2 m. M! f/ Z' t9 A& o; B  c
有見地 !!!
, Y5 p6 A9 a9 s* A( ?+ {現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html4 _- i$ R) `+ u9 `! P
4 V3 F0 F9 I- O) E' x" z! L
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
$ w7 ^, o4 [! A' a' xI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
. p' A  T- g; m4 r$ vI pretty sad that about the University official.
, s8 @7 h4 ]9 U, ?! ~* R, XIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
+ |: _" t3 v6 _; |; L+ N5 n$ A7 N: {9 Q
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
. ?, N9 d7 R8 o% e我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la9 c  |$ v/ {  j; o6 s4 N
1 D9 E0 K, D; A) T1 ~, W% h- s
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

1 H+ |; C4 G4 b+ D& |" D

( m7 l0 \- b; X6 K# R兩者有何分別?
9 g' w' V6 g: n8 {8 e2 O中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?