奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
6 G# p6 b* J+ o% l1 _0 [5 ^) j! p
agree,3 W7 A) F4 U) Q- T
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,  w/ V  n* z8 |  s3 l# }$ \
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,. o% R8 b$ L+ b( h( O. u7 _9 ^5 K
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

' @) e! t- b5 J5 R3 _) t- e* @# B
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
6 `, R8 i8 F' d已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地, @* l& o2 l  w) ^/ v/ O3 y7 a
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.7 p6 X0 l8 s6 h: i9 x
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:) |0 V5 u" e$ i: \0 D
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ) {( d6 Z0 [( _# z7 d

4 t! u4 Z' y7 _! {係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
" T1 _5 _, E4 X2 \1 ?* i# B  y) X4 i' b5 T  @+ P
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

, H" L# T+ c7 w3 A$ L4 ]* i% J% v8 \
0 W' r% s' Y# S8 O2 D絕對支持啦
( t- ]! p8 M3 ?9 Z% ?# z
! f2 q$ K3 O; y! ^) w有錯就認,打就企定0 A# }; s( j6 |4 F/ q" c7 l' K6 i) y

8 ?3 x; T+ C; t無錯當然要撐到底( K3 ?1 ~+ b. B; L/ p, S9 k4 R% |" {
1 q) O2 u5 f$ ?- h! b
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
% a* L/ N5 Z. v' L
- d' n. V. L# d1 Z7 I( i% x  [在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
) o, U; i6 e& W+ o# b) A& j8 x) p2 k
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力" d! l6 p3 T3 B; I9 Y0 f* m
: c5 z% m# Z8 r
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生4 ~6 Z. A! X0 n* Y
! T; H+ A) o0 n4 ]- x
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?1 D9 ]4 I# t+ K; I2 x
# T1 R$ y9 P5 G+ P1 k: L
我唔認為lor, v" Z; T0 c0 K4 h2 h0 d
4 P* q- f4 D0 z3 @
唔係話要整死佢地
4 W" Y# Y  ~$ Y  `
& F7 J6 G- _( N5 o9 D" _而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
2 R8 t  ~* m/ H  @$ O9 P) t/ l  `: E( N3 E, f; a
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大! i( B9 f) H" ^9 A% l3 m

; b8 l# Z+ m1 }有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的- V3 b% ?$ D, W" p% c6 ^

5 [  k# K' N' V6 W5 ], k- K唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
) N2 ~" v' n+ T& n/ e( ~3 o/ @: ]1 j( z8 I6 {- x/ o% L. F
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句. U5 A0 _  t1 C+ Y8 i
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"  ~- [" k6 D9 B/ c* Y7 q- V1 [1 r
* ]9 H1 X$ J$ c* L
我們的大學生! I- z! U/ U# i

" b) L# r( Q8 ~# @$ s+ P% E% c* ^
' w4 O4 W* a' F( X( p3 }
$ l, K/ j  f3 U  t3 O- F+ |$ Y  {2 r4 x: y! r  [

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:& c6 G  v% |2 l8 W( k

! z! M! _" ^/ H8 Q& o  l  `9 G2 O9 E* e0 @
有見地 !!!
& W7 {( I9 t3 w現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' r5 F2 o/ k5 {# C
6 U) z; o: B7 }1 t) c1 S
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 7 D, T/ L5 {3 ^
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
' _5 s' F% }5 t) a- \8 W6 sI pretty sad that about the University official.9 c# L+ W2 R5 w" h
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la% C# \2 N$ ?; `/ X3 w7 w

. a" Y. H: N5 q[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:% e3 j& q. Y7 L2 {8 M7 m
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
' e) x$ [1 v' R" A- r) e4 O7 J% Q% V6 f9 c1 S% k3 y, M) a9 k
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

( q2 r2 d5 K1 l

& E2 `% U& w8 k0 f# z兩者有何分別?
; M7 v9 b5 h6 i中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?