Rika

由最好排到最壞
( r' v- A7 X& a# LF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong0 g6 {" F6 E# M5 m0 K* Q
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
' f, ?2 ?$ |& h8 }( u2 ^* `S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her/ y2 q. x3 |/ a( q! F4 ~+ G
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
$ V/ ?! c% i7 O% d( G' nL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:7 d# p4 M3 t* T  N/ Z4 k6 y

% D5 W8 T, A; w' UM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
) {/ m" G% q6 ]: o; w8 }7 r! t
5 L4 ~% _/ w1 x; U' W% b& [4 MS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
- v$ }* K3 t2 |  w; @) u" G     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
( q* s' q! E5 c3 g8 Q: B
) i1 b1 d6 v; eB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
1 w- D4 V; \  [9 f+ [
3 e3 C# O# p! d+ k/ YL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志6 Y/ @, k7 |: Z* a: M
; V" W. P% @& z% K' T9 ]
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,3 V6 h  M! _6 p7 j3 {1 |
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好) d8 X3 o( x% S: Z5 M3 i
5 Y, I# s2 p" X. A
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
. h$ w* G% G: I/ w" h而家答多次
, ?4 ^  ]/ B: C" mf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
% n! ]! b+ i5 d  c/ _" {1 I, `+ E. Ll: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架5 x# L) N7 {+ [9 P! \; ^
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
9 X$ q" b3 h1 p, r/ v8 p$ ws: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
, Z' L: R$ _* {( x0 Lm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S$ `2 d7 N& r  f4 E2 F9 s2 _6 K

" ^1 l. Z) X* OL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
; U3 A$ i7 }. _) I3 E' OF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度5 }7 U% Q( ~# ?+ M6 _( i
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒( q0 a9 ]4 s% Z3 n/ M% h3 q" f/ u
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢, R% T+ w1 ~" V6 b  ^, L
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞1 X0 U+ K- }; S: Q$ Q$ O6 b: z
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默". n1 {4 F) e' T4 q: M
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
  I/ J8 I# M- f2 ]6 v# U1 Q1 K. yM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法! q/ h+ h5 y7 |3 p0 J: G  J
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果2 j( x' [9 d8 Y8 ~9 v: d5 n
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情9 X. V0 G. m" \* m. y# n; j

3 C! o& j* I* T% {! u世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
6 g! I6 ~8 k; J2 gL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
+ Y3 i0 B  o6 hB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
) ~0 c5 B# V6 s) @- w- p$ ]3 tS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件; w3 N7 o6 V, m8 h& \
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
& b+ A' q+ ?6 I& k5 V3 x% jM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

# f# a) ~* I. t1 E9 f  L! ]
; B/ R4 d3 ~) D  Y: u0 s# l
same choices with u , but want to add some comments ! i$ @, n. u$ R

3 i0 i: ^# Y$ k* h1 h; nB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
' O4 r0 [0 |0 V& _) p' T6 }$ N6 D7 M8 d* j2 ^
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )" q# z' I# Y" x( Z; J3 M# Y
- K& A7 N$ h: u$ D2 B. H
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome + |, `+ T& r# x  t

! u2 y+ ^# I$ x7 |  k! r1 h3 z3 \M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......: l# v1 j7 u. T# W; T5 F: B
/ o* r7 v# ]$ N
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
6 t# y3 X$ k1 w  V$ U5 ZM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 q& ?/ M) }% ?- |8 c, s1 O' E! HL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
/ t" K- G+ V( tF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
5 o* ]3 l- H5 X0 b, D' Q1 |( ]6 K1 Z
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....  v  C1 G2 t4 n$ P
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，8 O1 W; q- W8 m1 J3 v. f( `1 M) n
由最好開始排起既話，, P( P, f0 G  d; U/ V$ n/ F2 ]
L B M F S 啦，
- }. P- Z( V6 [  x+ c9 `% G$ v
3 Z* K8 N" |" V$ _$ M其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，  ]$ G) |1 R3 N& J9 V9 j* S' W
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
5 y0 H. O3 |8 t& a# z" R: \# ]) g如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
0 N" P. i1 C4 d又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
5 N) }/ H4 g4 b+ }/ n& |
. g& Y  [7 o8 Z4 W1 M4 V而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，4 d# t9 {$ ?3 C1 C* K4 i3 L6 E
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
( t) I; M+ Z3 j$ g! s明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
& [/ R! _. b0 Y8 j; ^* J) V# d% j) y- N- o: Y( g
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，" Q- t; F+ c8 V0 d& x; ~
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
. O( J2 S5 R$ [; g" ~, ]亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
3 |) t8 k$ G7 W; Q0 r, z知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
3 F4 \" z+ w1 P% n M 都可算壞了。1 D! g& _* q) w- V( ~+ O; R) _

2 E. h( c/ y% |$ j6 |' f& ~, { F 呢個人仲掂，
$ N% R/ N8 Q1 Q* D知道既唔等於要講，
2 `3 F( r8 d. H$ |* K如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
. Y& R; K: s6 m% w0 a( i4 R我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。  ]! @' L- @5 }! S( f) S

: |$ S) Y3 \3 j2 G+ t- \最衰個個緊係 S 啦，$ L! \9 R3 i' O8 i: N; D
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
. |$ N& H  z$ |. T- M2 y4 \! }: n8 ]6 X' N: L3 X! @
6 s( o1 \: i" l+ a1 }5 a9 b- d
/ e9 J2 c1 n! K- ?# s
題外話：/ Q* O$ F; Q* \; R
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
. C! x/ R) N; ?, [+ w睇到 S 呢條友，+ g/ |( e+ J7 E% g4 a
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
1 \/ n0 N  ^- t2 ]  g" @, P  ?3 A* W# o, F" t  }+ N) f6 Z4 U
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
% U- b5 T4 ~( ?9 H% MF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係, E5 v& o7 ?# I/ d2 Z
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她9 T. ?2 }& N2 \. ]- R
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害9 r% w) e5 r: Y! f: u
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...