Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:- ~8 z4 Y( J- ^7 l6 M, t8 {& R

/ a; D9 e5 K( P6 g+ w7 T6 q& r& \& E2 e0 [$ a8 s
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

& E6 L! H0 H( G; m& K. e3 X2 D
! _3 z+ L$ F& y3 D$ P* gIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:7 H4 B- Y; Q# V% f% b0 N  {

) r9 A, }& s$ n6 X' _& q$ x/ F6 l# i( @: [
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

6 |" R4 e6 `( B& k1 V

  w0 P4 o* r  Q5 I4 Loh really.... D1 D* `1 x( {  W! X
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
% {  Z! m" j+ P! {i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題" q* r/ h, U" g' g# Q6 o
7 a* }# ?3 b9 U9 s) T3 Q
當然這是個假設性問題* b# N- a" |6 P
但將人數倍大
0 a) V0 o; V0 {4 |8 F例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個5 r* Z- V2 L9 i5 o! {$ K3 ?  f
(情況可以換作其他)
3 u# y7 P% _% Z0 ?; f- j& [! K始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
  I2 c1 h7 ^5 z0 @' l如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...$ R2 k; Q) z& Z6 m$ |" k
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
8 \3 ?# ^- l7 r, o/ O- M絕情谷既問題...
. q4 [" ^3 r, R) A  U$ Q如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
& J- t& p$ d0 \. c如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

  S4 v( M6 k8 f; W5 I- O殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好6 ?6 Y. C3 e/ Z) t
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
2 d5 a: z  o8 Z但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
! z, A/ d2 Y3 D8 ~  P好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
; B6 R/ a* j- f9 `6 V% ~0 M其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
4 y% |. R2 m1 x, m$ t4 l9 O8 R* y/ T: y+ G
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
# G( S3 E/ Z; s, b+ \7 W9 S不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:; j6 }" F. [: O  w9 X+ a) x2 z: w
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

1 c, F& u$ V+ p' @! {+ J$ }3 \; [4 o1 }  |1 P
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣; Q, x. o( L: N
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
* w; `; a" \; p+ `5 L! R8 s2 x6 b; r2 M4 E- a* m
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
1 T! X% `2 p6 }) x& _/ Vyes, my reason is helping more
9 N. H- V! H; T: s( l. t+ zfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!. w# C) f6 x) U# {* U5 L+ \$ n* J
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
, A' K5 E8 ^! F/ q: Sbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?# l) E( n# Z+ R5 ?) s6 v( t4 G
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
7 h( T: Z& ?# a! amay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!  w. W$ x& P/ @
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~4 H! v' U  ]$ ~" [1 a6 X+ ~$ }0 }
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~# F  D$ T( n  A( n
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
! e8 q* |; v( H# r正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
4 s6 k  D6 [5 N8 v5 I4 M即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
& N" T' Q* ^& L3 D1 I2 l我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~& S( c, M* x' T# V
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
9 _; ^% n. D, c& G2 m8 g$ h我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）