Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
  f+ Z( c2 }: A& G
* m* |2 D' ~" U  n! u. l
5 s+ S% z) t# a( |% z0 F7 o我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

( }. Q7 v! Z; R6 p
( M5 _0 F8 l9 w: }" @
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:; T$ i: ]' P4 ?0 e+ @/ l' l

5 |+ P; x/ N5 y& U" C7 o) z1 k6 X! p8 ~7 [, G
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

6 k( c" e1 Y4 B% U

/ R; {5 e( l7 M8 y. H& poh really...! [5 v1 }/ m0 a, l/ k7 d5 d1 L
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"1 o( m; K, B  }1 D- p. ?
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題) M  [) g- P& g1 h0 x: Q; G
. C5 T8 y; Q7 V& o
當然這是個假設性問題. B8 q# B- K8 f
但將人數倍大
5 w  n& u# ]4 u  m" f例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個3 t1 G! h+ b* G3 ^
(情況可以換作其他)
  u5 F$ q* q$ V$ {1 W始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題.../ g9 }" ]* ?7 q! y1 f8 I5 w
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...7 T8 K% U/ \  z- T) ], M
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
! ~( H" `; r* C) m; L0 ]絕情谷既問題...  t' v& G& M+ x: b8 d- E
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
$ l6 M! |% c9 H& p3 B6 A) N6 Q1 S如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

7 r% ~/ h* C  t( r5 e5 R殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好% W/ I8 F( A8 p+ v3 G9 q' P% X% m
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生* Y0 r; `; C* i' F
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩% n1 o* a+ u: ~& M
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢5 ]3 k: Q, E) D% y% o' Y
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
4 z+ w7 `* X6 U) ~$ g$ P
$ V: v1 X' d; I5 g4 y; P% y! n. L, q我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命" ~+ R$ m, V$ g4 \2 E) m/ ~
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:1 Y" G3 U9 C/ N8 q# x$ n8 I
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

' Y1 h: ]( i4 F& v$ d

! Z, `6 s: r/ ~4 ]: P$ nhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣( x0 F0 X+ W# k3 w. P5 l
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
9 }7 V( Z+ M( ^  z$ ~: A. i5 U4 a
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child- G4 P4 R6 w- }$ A8 c+ K
yes, my reason is helping more' w) u6 X; b4 T' V$ `8 t
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
3 r' I+ L5 ?' ]: h7 mif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child0 T4 j1 J  j8 Q2 u- e: T! k
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?6 R+ t( q% j9 Z) X- t
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!* Z" j/ g- P+ G& s. ~, d: l  W
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
5 {, W9 A! x, o. l( t( n- @under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~* \! q& w; h! @+ t/ i/ R8 i
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~/ c' I& r' \: }4 x) X& s0 W
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
" x2 q0 r: R( a" H1 U  l正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
4 V8 N' \1 S, ~+ j4 s即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
: V  [3 r4 A7 _4 D2 C( a; Y我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
% Q1 w9 |  b$ v9 T7 O( P' q但如果o係當時o既情況中~~$ H* |; t0 }  n5 Z! b! l3 m8 R
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）