Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:9 m. f& p# E# Z$ U7 I8 Y/ R6 A) m

/ o% S6 A2 Q; u7 o* P% x& l
& V8 {2 o6 L- E$ H# [我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

$ B$ M& [! a) P: g- _4 N& \- m9 W
  R7 Z- W9 a. J) M  P5 g, R
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
0 ^+ g! S4 x' u% |$ K: x+ v" N- [
$ J7 w* b8 f# I
( T7 Q; ]6 E7 a* w$ F7 [6 _In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

! _1 O5 Q# z. }* \: S; a; D5 L
, I& ?, ]& m3 _$ b5 X; f
oh really...1 H( i  ^  s/ j5 W( c
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
. T5 `# v9 A8 Fi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題1 D* ]) n  B3 g/ ^% k4 g& \

* |2 j$ j% f/ Z% A7 k當然這是個假設性問題
% u% f$ S! ]3 A但將人數倍大5 c4 U) A2 U0 v$ U+ ~
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
8 i, |4 R+ o4 T! L- [: V(情況可以換作其他)
9 l! e3 c+ e8 w+ s8 E始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...7 _. ?1 Z6 c8 G) p5 e' y) r3 D
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
) a& q/ N" H1 Z: r3 c: \! ?; P如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
  T! r6 g* s3 t絕情谷既問題.../ q( u4 W* \/ M
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
5 M* e* y, d! N0 J& {5 f/ k$ T如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

8 l  l" }7 Y2 n) a7 p! G$ `( B( m殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
* N! u* X3 F( @' V# r於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生) F. p( x- N" n: o5 T7 J' L, p# s
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩5 `8 a8 K* K( V9 z
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢& G" j- f! o+ C$ `: R% Q! _/ ?
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢4 P/ M" @1 X& F9 z0 S+ R
8 r: y0 v( _0 m8 ?2 b
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命4 H. A$ P; Q& z3 y) l$ X% J
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:' U0 [. A, q9 B+ N, I
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

: m* R  @0 C* |$ i4 L5 D; i
6 @8 Z4 c* Q9 x# Thaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
# H- s$ H6 `+ D( E$ r6 P9 }4 W+ f你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
. ^1 E9 _0 u) f: v( H( x& k
. B: b( g2 s( ^7 U" ], ]p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
/ m% y, a) p) e. X$ Myes, my reason is helping more
4 }: c' u2 a" g5 H1 u% B: }for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
3 H: T' y( Q1 {* G( Vif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
  d; G+ ?3 Q' x+ rbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?5 j3 R2 y  G( G1 V3 N
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!# S% O' H% d6 ~1 b- ~8 v  k
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!; u" u( ^* C! X9 n  [
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
, r$ N) `+ F- E: E* q  m當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
2 |6 N( m* x4 u- i; Z2 }我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~2 w: s8 W: F: h. j/ j* z) x. a
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
5 u: S  Q1 u8 w2 A7 n6 S9 s4 L即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~$ N& X8 p0 o3 p' l
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
2 O" |) X! W6 ?% `. e但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
9 W) a6 N/ Z" E; w! B, ]我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）