Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
% R3 Z! R: b9 t& h; W1 m- r/ B& N% R7 k; X' N. o- c9 @

) R7 y5 X9 ~$ b' W$ A  z+ K1 O% O9 c( n我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

* ~" u' J$ g, y5 t& k+ ~( R
9 \6 e+ T( }0 a4 a
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:6 m( s( F/ Q. W3 d
- E* q/ T; K" C. d, X" \6 \0 |
+ [  h1 M( I; N) {6 x- c" b9 y
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

4 |+ U- R1 s" m* x' p3 O2 ]5 z& b1 j3 q& d
oh really...
; l7 R& C+ ^& d6 U/ whahhaa, thx a lot^^", d* {3 K* Z8 |( m/ _  [
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題$ V5 Y; ?6 O, V! N; `

; p& w) a" g1 |" M% H% J當然這是個假設性問題2 [5 b$ J1 o, J2 o! V
但將人數倍大# Z8 ?# v* f/ O  v) P, M; s
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個5 D# E2 K' _& i) B4 j% F$ B# ]8 L# O
(情況可以換作其他)  M4 L2 @$ @& }5 T( s9 V
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
% Z% I. G5 d! U$ ~/ E7 i) ?% n如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
- f% i! N1 f- v6 ~* j如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:9 {7 s8 ]0 m! P3 t
絕情谷既問題...% v* ]( J6 Q1 l& T* E
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...+ ?4 T) y( ^# i$ J2 M
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

! N' y! Q9 L$ g% V( t) \) U  B# C
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
; W& D) \: C: r: V) @8 o8 K7 O0 N0 q於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生0 |/ {2 V! ^! C% X8 v. v  i
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
, a4 h, O2 d& e好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
. `! I- F9 Z% k其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢! ?! \4 C. g/ [1 W8 l) h  [
& `0 Q& }: F9 [$ l/ |7 e  `
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命! o6 ]! }  W8 N& _+ L
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
/ r, T2 @  `; L. U/ v8 g0 Y其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

9 h# w& b) y. {# G2 T$ P2 R3 m" V
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣- I# Z$ q! V" F. `# K8 ]7 o
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....1 U7 @0 y  e0 M7 O8 \1 l+ @4 D

) k8 o" o8 F. R; u* Fp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child  S' u0 Z( O7 _6 H$ t
yes, my reason is helping more
" r) ^0 I. H) w: i5 z: Tfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!' R: a+ i0 l4 A9 B+ ]6 V/ o
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
1 s- O6 x/ [/ _! P( }because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?# X* z. n1 t7 B+ T* O! `, K
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
  X8 s4 y$ Z  {may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!4 h; ?7 l5 {& C4 G
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
! ?8 S: w; G! t$ d* Q當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~; o$ {% ?+ U4 |* }& G
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
3 \' X$ B! J: X$ h5 f# Y正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
2 P9 L- {/ D3 a9 ~即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~  Y7 n2 g0 ~/ H$ w
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~* l" G) m( T0 V; X
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~2 t* ~. W& G( ~3 Y1 c" Y
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）