Rika

由最好排到最壞# T- n0 a2 j0 L) b" K8 B$ P
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong: g9 Q8 q" `6 l1 R
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount6 u" l  C) N/ a" M
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her( F4 ^7 Q' \, B
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure4 Z  w! s* w1 g
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:+ s4 X* F/ G$ T! q; G

* x% ~; c9 R4 y' |- ]2 D9 L6 |) rM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人) q2 n0 @" F# ]! W' R+ B0 |! r2 K
" H; X) J3 s/ t; w
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
" {$ C) @* \1 I, P' k! ]$ X     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!/ p. m7 c' ^9 w3 p- N2 a% v3 e2 |  ~
* S0 T+ E/ _8 V2 g" b- d8 M7 ~, z4 r
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
, P8 x$ p! t4 r2 ^) [- I: P- u: y4 A4 x0 P
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
1 w' H1 X# X1 {2 D% f0 ^
2 C! {" _8 g6 wF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,  \6 t, k' O% x( |# J( F% R/ K
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好7 d/ |  A/ p4 _# u) M, J: i( m

( _* k( P; e3 `2 P[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
7 V+ I! z- B) X+ [& r! I. p而家答多次
# \# s- \( u5 R, p9 O' cf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
* R' p9 ]% F3 V. w1 al: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
/ r+ [. \# h+ g. R' x7 lb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢2 {  B2 j, a, y4 T
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
6 V5 o; Y7 `- e  o# rm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
8 ]8 t  E) |& W7 a, c. U0 ]5 E% X% D1 z1 j2 i4 C" `4 p( w0 Q& o
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大' C! x7 c7 ]2 D
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度% R9 g# ^" H" l2 r$ T6 o$ r
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
, A$ `/ q$ Q1 P' `S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
, k3 p# h. }& b; KB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞; |" B& y! c1 f6 L) n; Z& }6 F  f- B
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
) n! {3 c" T" V9 w4 t2 U. G2 ~/ ?S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
/ f! \8 N& w, ]1 q4 }M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法+ \: l0 E+ C( [8 V8 s  U% e; @2 d
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
4 F$ ^8 P$ A" |  O. eB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
/ r' U& B1 K: `4 ?
2 j, H3 f/ M7 F  J& J世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:/ }# Q4 u; j. R1 N2 a0 k
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
) D+ _' T& ~/ o6 K; g* u' L& _4 DB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
6 o3 x  Z6 W% ?: ^* m6 G$ H2 [' }2 KS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
  x: p  \0 P$ _4 ^& _F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方( ]+ A* e& v4 q- Y3 o3 s+ R, l
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

: t; K) Y3 q5 A3 Z/ l% d- t. Z3 l
7 v1 n8 q6 i; {6 v' i& @5 d
same choices with u , but want to add some comments   t& V4 E. b( T% c2 [

) L1 y) v' C9 a) T, X% F6 G% hB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  4 d, N  s; k3 f7 D
' O# N* t  n/ H* a+ Y/ c
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
* ~# m7 b" m% ~* j6 ~
% _4 r+ V* K! [3 M( \: HF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 7 [+ r7 b1 K9 v" f+ B, A1 X

! ~/ H, I2 i  O- {M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......2 V/ I( l% n4 T8 H8 z

% E# U) U, @: g) O4 w. `( R, D/ Z* i2 e' i[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge7 g. A$ {4 G/ q0 F  D
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
9 o( n* p; e% h2 H# n8 O: D1 ?' YL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
1 k; _- l% E  n9 b8 h& Q+ EF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma9 K5 |$ Q: e, @4 ?" X8 G5 e8 O

# n; _8 u2 @' p! I* b: Q最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....6 n) f2 q5 x- x. d3 v
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，8 y- z6 d+ W3 m
由最好開始排起既話，
  i( h- O7 A& p9 I0 C* OL B M F S 啦，6 h1 m" d9 _* G9 f
' k$ _/ O( U8 r- {# T
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，& w  }5 i. j, t+ v9 F  I
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？' r2 x4 l- D& M: r
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
- ^$ }5 T) ^; R. O又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。& i0 I5 R5 I* B8 T

' j' o: _) \) t7 t# T9 c- r而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
& |( v7 B6 s: F4 ?( [! S* r" i所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
% g2 d" |, x  p明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。- p% H! C9 L+ C3 B# R# I
% ]& t8 X. B" z$ f; F
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
$ Q, v. C& W" n- S* ]; Q M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，! j1 t7 Z0 z' P! |  F' x9 T+ y: a
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
! I  A3 k* H  _! @- ]1 e知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
! T+ a! D# ]9 Q' C4 ^0 k* T6 W) f M 都可算壞了。0 F! v% g! |) ^0 v" H; Q

' s# F  ], @+ C8 M F 呢個人仲掂，' Z" l# j  M! u% \, ?
知道既唔等於要講，
. V9 W3 j0 u0 x8 G, S5 z如果呢件事發生係自己身上，1 Q0 |% K5 ]" z. W$ `- S# j, @" b4 c! s: K
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
' g0 ]2 R/ X) M$ n# O1 S* a; ~+ T  z
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，' t% o) _, C. L# U: @
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。6 R4 ]6 I3 E  @. R: D& P
! T- s9 X9 d( G* O

0 }: e% r; Q# E( B
4 p5 n: E; l! z9 ?# V/ x9 Z! }6 G題外話：
) ^& ~( u1 q1 u唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
2 \7 O" @$ s- X睇到 S 呢條友，4 @/ V4 I3 I* U- M; g! g, L2 E
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L7 e% p+ j6 R3 ~  F6 p; Q
: i+ f: ?7 z$ ]" B  H0 ?1 t" }
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!6 F5 L& Y( [; v. d. Q- L0 n
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
) D1 n0 [, D1 g/ {, NM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
% B' w6 q0 D) C9 B2 y7 HB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
# H3 S2 l. O/ x6 D5 q8 WL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...