Rika

由最好排到最壞
& H  q) m6 S* P2 RF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong3 P1 V9 N8 H( s( Z: B& Q; i" H
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
- h" a- v$ Q1 Y+ c& wS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
  a2 u8 f) l/ U6 bM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
# E* C; ]7 c' p+ DL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
: i9 Z2 T5 E- F/ T* ?
  {% a; t- a4 T) r1 qM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
2 ?6 u( _  R* A9 m( e, A5 c; l1 E) T& P5 r, w, h: t6 O
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
8 c- q5 N2 z( ]- Q/ a     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!% G  ]$ j" g5 |+ r5 y

/ O2 o+ o1 N- gB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
+ T# \& C+ O3 |5 @: E% l& [8 K% m7 }* H$ P) o1 N
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志  p" r& c, Z" D
1 s2 {" ~; ~4 p5 o
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
8 e: u5 T3 q1 `+ H% i: Q2 h     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好5 h- ?$ q' K# w! m5 [

2 M! ~- o4 y7 x" l6 L2 Q: ]3 K[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
  c9 X3 U2 Q# K7 S7 ]1 V. K而家答多次
) K1 D* w6 ?7 ~0 _) xf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
: F1 g& c( a3 J0 J5 E( T% k* Nl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架+ T% H: P: x" t7 |
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
# D! D& e7 X, N. F& y$ |+ Js: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
- x3 C+ E2 l- Y+ G8 H$ Rm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S, Y1 b, w- u/ @4 m8 A0 G1 I2 G0 {! Z

- j! [3 e2 x: w7 sL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大- i  g. G  K" B* o3 K
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度# G# N1 T+ M' N+ D1 s
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
4 Y" c) q7 g6 y# Z0 p3 E+ e* U5 oS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
# d5 ~$ E, ?) A2 d; Z" pB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
4 [  r: {9 h, |, e. B2 mF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
  Z1 d0 @  L) hS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取5 f5 o* ]: b4 f, ~
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法& y9 c. p6 E- Z* s# G0 w4 V# X& Z
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果* O7 V- u$ Y* c. j: x
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
7 k$ x" C$ e" @$ ]7 x* m; @$ `1 N7 Y, `5 i- I/ u
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:2 m8 L5 |+ Q. R# X* S) Y/ M
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
- n, H, d$ d, D/ C3 AB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
: K( d, r: s- VS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
- h0 ~. Q; o3 u5 B. ~F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
7 a( s2 N& N. O/ h1 ^! o/ `# L" T: qM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 F7 a* h) z+ ], V/ k- u5 q0 l3 Q
& K  i1 T0 z/ }( z( X1 ?
same choices with u , but want to add some comments : e4 z! T( w7 q( M; `1 F

5 I5 B+ |% y" X2 n$ W9 uB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  - P; Y# N: ^1 ^, Y

2 P/ o/ [6 c) X4 z5 @( i/ k% US : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )/ P2 l2 v& p# g

2 ~' n, A" _; X, uF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome : o- h9 O: k$ ^; d) s' m6 }1 ?
% J6 i2 G1 f' V* P# w7 f
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so....../ [$ u! \" f" ~  p5 P% f- r
7 D9 b3 K8 Z5 I% I* r
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
# A5 ^: Y. \- w$ n" q) l4 zM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
! V6 D* q8 h. P: j  @; B3 j. r0 r) gL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點! z2 {4 H8 @) D$ X3 e
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma& j4 i/ M" w$ I3 Z! t
$ {7 r; Q: r& q: f+ R" o" ]
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
  j. K' h# P+ P% f% a/ n" Z6 Q9 g/ l有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，) L; z3 V! ~' ?3 ?  {9 K$ y
由最好開始排起既話，' s  \2 p& H# f% b8 S) S* X
L B M F S 啦，7 O% X0 m0 Z& T2 t

0 n, A. ~( U) h4 n其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
" U2 O2 W4 V) Q$ N但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？* _) L& U2 E- p3 Z3 P' h1 _
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？. w9 z# ?' ^$ j) |# f7 F
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。. b! O8 Y/ H% o+ u4 t
  y( \1 ^" ^$ d8 o- Q
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，1 N0 J. L, F) O
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，6 w/ F' A$ A& y3 U
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。3 A' }( ~$ t- B) P8 a3 `

5 `+ d& }  c' d9 M( _: p- Z7 Q而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
0 x8 a$ c3 D3 e( u M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
  ^  ?& [9 f5 f" k9 B' B8 g亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，! R& V# }* x  ~% X9 \7 K
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
$ C6 O3 d! _, H" f4 T8 g) r6 d M 都可算壞了。) A+ \$ o9 O# a( H- l3 S( ~

$ d5 Q2 D$ B3 H; T2 ?( p F 呢個人仲掂，) p! w& [8 o8 n8 [1 [
知道既唔等於要講，
. e+ P* B' P" H* H; r* `- K( V如果呢件事發生係自己身上，+ e: Y3 O+ k. [) l3 x' @3 f& Y
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
2 M. m, b* [! C, e/ R" T4 v8 S0 W0 O: p( E! Q- }
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，" r) g! [3 x1 c+ T- j8 b
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。: H7 {! g" f7 J( I5 e- x" X& W- k! j

: i: x0 z  n. ]# R. g1 S# x' S' X1 e; V9 _) Q; l
: \3 j, g7 V$ ?2 U' T6 E
題外話：0 |) |! L% B* x0 w# c8 i1 R7 o
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，) J7 L. W% O- a; @0 ?
睇到 S 呢條友，
! Q2 i1 N' ?6 J% D( M" W1 E我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
! B/ w4 C8 p' a4 o; g0 |: W! R+ E% A6 O0 Z7 z
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
6 ?9 A6 h0 D: h6 Z' q* H, wF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
4 R# N8 \1 N3 TM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
, `- N4 X/ I6 g4 G( R3 k$ SB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
) j  n+ |4 ^8 Q# n# c$ |. SL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...