Rika

由最好排到最壞; w2 f  G, u6 C' _" [
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
, `/ |7 O  [" Q$ QB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount+ ?5 n) u$ N6 E
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
$ r6 P2 c$ r  U7 G' |M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
8 ?, o+ L9 S/ [0 gL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
( O% F8 g0 c; ?0 L
; F# d0 K; x9 x# kM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
: _2 l" d! S+ Z5 i1 d. w  l4 v/ N7 ?. G0 G7 K- x$ ~
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
( ?% c$ {1 Q# M3 U; X     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!2 g, w9 l- Z# {% Q; U) a

/ `" O# h* j" NB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做8 f& u4 R# Z3 R* W5 o& ]2 {

, @1 N! a, ]; C( X* C# L0 DL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志& u) S, R# T! |: Z/ K

6 N. x$ k" j  D" P3 L* j  b2 OF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,2 _$ C+ p- M& a- e
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好' R# W0 U1 T5 j) f3 f$ o

9 `1 q% h5 w. v7 R/ O[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案3 Q/ g/ w' c4 Y* A
而家答多次
  l/ U! O) L( \  d4 Jf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽9 U) k; v2 J; V3 |
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
5 M2 v& r+ o+ Z, Wb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢3 e& j3 J0 R. |- ]6 K2 R
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.  d( `" [4 f& I+ u2 B- e( i" U: F
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
! F8 g; J, F8 Q, k! z4 I; a* A; P: z* g
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大5 W* Z3 \! {! R" @
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度! s+ h" \4 G. d
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒$ F7 ]) ]2 ]/ y4 a# z
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
5 w0 e; h, Y0 c) uB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞. U: w. p3 D. J/ y, l, l* v
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
- H9 w2 ?$ |6 B! r4 F! }% ]( IS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取  ~' _* D( W; ?, m
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法" d1 z4 `7 O0 `: |
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
: t; |% m# N5 D% U% sB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情2 q2 g3 L/ g! T
( d8 K. t, _7 G0 ]- q  J' V1 l
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
" q# I* R9 R) u+ q4 \L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己) k" Y) E: o0 ], }6 W- _: z# R
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘( l0 l' w, u/ }+ R' o% k8 W' D
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件5 F+ `1 m3 x6 H3 \7 P# ~0 w
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
) h5 R  B3 g7 r  }! a! _3 }M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

; s4 s" l  L$ P0 `
# D3 x4 L9 s" B, n; @4 |# y same choices with u , but want to add some comments
& |. J" ~9 [! k8 j4 ?
' ^. `( F1 G: D* V6 V* }9 U& B7 [! aB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
& k6 c& a# L* n- E: E
) w6 r5 i9 J2 q7 U: v. d, |S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )$ }  d$ a" C, g8 U) }+ [4 e
8 d5 Q4 x$ D0 ~* d. @
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 7 ]) _0 @  P$ Y0 n" J* q

4 N9 q1 l* V! S7 G& ~M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
: B- U- ?. g* W7 [$ B
0 P2 ]2 v" A7 N6 @[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
8 e: z; H8 U( eM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
9 P9 N* s7 o! e' LL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
5 N* {6 P6 D( i5 o- M2 {3 l" PF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
+ i! U* x( r2 S" d
  j+ u9 M. t, u- i  ?最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....6 m3 h% g; Q" O
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，/ h0 @* m7 ^8 S) _/ \8 V
由最好開始排起既話，: T. j/ x6 s/ r- h* R& l) H
L B M F S 啦，+ d! A! {+ }) L+ V) G) i7 Y  X3 x
: M- r/ I0 M4 u5 X) J
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
, @( O" B5 Z& ]( B  y但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？& H  r4 T  C+ i$ c% p
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
3 {( J  K5 W! ~, t又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
/ e3 Z! Z  @9 W3 ~8 ]. X2 G! f1 A( y
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
6 @- |( @$ P6 [$ z, O所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，8 E/ N  O' t$ l. f* z8 x/ Q+ z
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。0 j, l4 [4 J2 ?7 ~- z6 F( B
* r5 ~# R! S9 o" n  A5 V
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，0 b) @/ [1 X1 a; l2 E) T% R
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
6 W# W1 M. {& y: [% F' V亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
& {6 S$ h* P/ W1 q# w$ X( A. Y知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，# U* h8 S2 B# A- b) f7 r3 j% r
M 都可算壞了。
7 s5 S+ }: n! e3 Q$ Q2 `, @
- C( a- d4 Q  V8 P1 ]5 x F 呢個人仲掂，
% v- ^+ z, E2 w7 l知道既唔等於要講，0 h5 C# |4 Y5 e& q4 [. B
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
) b2 s- I% h8 U  Y我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
' a) ]' n0 F5 i4 d7 B2 N* O
( @5 W" b+ x- a6 h+ y( x+ r最衰個個緊係 S 啦，; F) G$ c1 ~3 Q4 Z) J2 ?
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
& [6 Q& @1 A  C8 W7 |3 Q" d! z6 a& _( v0 N; P0 _: I
  ~4 t3 }$ R' z2 l& L
5 X* g  G, k( `7 u
題外話：. @: v% d) C. L6 E* l( u# D
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
/ A  D- H' [5 I% y' r$ ~& h( Y/ l睇到 S 呢條友，
& N4 v9 z- w' F, x我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
$ L* g* ]( N1 \8 p# w& h- N0 x  L, S5 q
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
9 V8 v  z" s+ X) s  r- }. T% dF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
0 M3 o- g6 Y, k: N# O+ tM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
/ v4 j: j4 G+ b5 `" D; C9 pB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
3 [) u6 B. ~4 K8 \! YL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...