 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
$ r$ d; d2 `( W2 C
4 @! G6 ?$ X# `$ ]: U. }according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.2 j- z1 r9 F! W& \
, h0 M6 Q8 j6 \9 O% Q/ o3 sIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
4 g. n2 w) G) ]8 N( c0 u+ `: w$ Cand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
/ P" ^2 Q: b0 l$ W; S2 p9 h, [% k# L' u/ ^" f9 w. X2 d
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
, K7 n; ]7 }/ G$ g; w1 m: K; G
* f5 v# V" v# l/ Din 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 2 C( [$ F7 O3 K+ D$ v& v9 U0 ?1 H9 m
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|