|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
! W7 {6 k: ]1 M e7 W
' w. i2 @, R# D3 [) P% baccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
6 c% N/ S. j H9 m% \! W6 U4 G$ N- G2 c; E7 g u
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,3 ~* P* v0 V4 B( d8 g
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.; t2 C; I" Y2 I! H. b3 \- H& i* u3 ^, k
! @9 u9 D8 g$ `% ^5 G b0 V+ o% _
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險5 ], r* c; D* z: \, n
" y) p( h2 k1 U" T" o6 e4 T1 K- B
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 5 D0 R7 F; v. u0 O5 }4 _2 p3 |
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|