|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
% a4 M4 S2 r, ^' l$ M3 V Z$ E' f
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this., C4 w3 X4 f2 a3 G
* A" y0 V% p' O Y4 H
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,( |% P: f6 w$ s8 n$ @% x/ j
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.' u& \- f7 p: |, |0 p
3 D: \. L' \ Nso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險2 j# G1 s7 \1 O+ [# h
) b% ~+ e. t6 A" s4 C6 Ein 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, % O: o9 z- v M( [
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|