唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

rayyipas

唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

oz2

港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?  G1 \, C/ m4 J5 H
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖8 s3 A( B5 i( i7 C  [
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:& z; a, y5 n1 b) L
港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?* W( ^/ {: h7 B
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
/ T' E% z6 K1 T( }( o難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

: b3 e! _- T& U9 f1 m# x
$ C/ L8 _* |, Y% I; Z* L
特首有講過要封港台嗎？

oz2

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:: ^+ c4 q" m/ ^- X& X
. T+ j+ u* k. E# ~7 `
' e! ]9 J: l( M+ w1 e3 N
特首有講過要封港台嗎？

' Q1 u/ C7 b; N6 D2 E2 Q+ Z) f( u" k$ N7 N) B' u+ f
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:7 F9 Z8 x4 O+ ^! E2 w6 ?
1 r" a/ \/ j  a4 b  C
: g6 W% |& d2 v. s4 {7 k6 L
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

9 V' P* g6 Q7 E- R; u. v4 p8 I  f9 \4 I/ Q3 ~6 P4 D
=封港台?

oz2

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:
' Q/ y" F# w/ q5 h( K0 X, F8 y8 r
/ P& m$ f. }$ w* g3 H+ S0 ]* U! X* e* [" q' }, l5 _+ C- o+ V
=封港台?

: V: `) @7 O5 e% P6 s% ^+ `
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:
5 m% r$ p7 y4 O/ `( e6 s; ~4 m, z% d! ^  L% Z: p; [
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

$ u6 n* m7 k. S7 T
6 k( y: f$ E/ ~) g; j
"如果"
& K$ M, E0 @( P. W* \0 C/ ]: ?
0 l; S: l) \4 Q: @  Rthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.

oz2

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
* {) {$ y' E3 l5 i2 p1 o2 K
7 M% n0 m! [/ d) L/ J) f0 O9 T" W$ V" V0 E; ]1 o
"如果"9 F) I7 o5 ~/ c. w1 _

* S% v) y% ?- B+ w- W2 g% nthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.

9 C- _, {7 R9 S8 @: g
想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言
$ y1 @& |4 l* S# W7 `3 r' ]本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。
: |1 A; L( f9 b7 B+ ]; D9 o
" z2 P/ e5 |6 p' _1 p0 \5 M+ M豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?
9 @) ^8 G, l  v) a$ X, r3 b2 `& s
當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。
, E& Q4 M$ [0 s# p5 w, I) ~5 B  E
[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ]