奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:9 A3 l& ?; a9 v

) f: P% w- ]8 d* ?" D& yagree,
' @( N/ x$ \& w7 r, {" J4 u我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,! ~5 ?- E4 @! k& E1 H
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,( [3 k4 I1 y6 N) D- W4 H
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

+ J! O" J6 R$ L/ s: ], ~
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html5 S& n: ~# c2 D
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地- q: N9 c7 e0 ^' t
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.. h$ H$ e: L( b; H+ i, A
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:) w/ z) b3 f- Q
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
) J; w+ y( H. f; j, [( Z3 U- m% Q: F" T- Q6 v
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???0 y1 n( ^/ v! o  n
* F' M' `" ?& L# y9 T& Z
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

3 ?* s2 x8 n  ~: F2 ~
7 r9 O- i) G7 s
絕對支持啦& |7 M0 P2 O( }: A2 X% Z

- C0 c' D2 m! Q" y有錯就認,打就企定
% X( s7 M7 t# s) s  w: o) R7 d* z7 Q7 v9 @6 `. y! P, ~6 ~
無錯當然要撐到底% W: V% E8 E/ I. N
8 y" s3 a2 o. e
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
- `( `, G" O0 |2 c$ V+ ]% I% V0 ?1 e1 ~: c
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
% ?$ f- ~' h& |% g/ r/ y$ q+ F8 V
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力7 [2 z$ T+ N6 C( T* ~" c* u

8 U  Q  ~& j! j& B我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
# b8 w9 u8 M4 C0 _/ C  k9 U) b9 H+ _. i0 y6 q8 M: i4 C1 e7 H
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
4 K; j. y* b8 x* _( k" l3 ]
9 z4 N" B1 z5 \8 j6 b6 M我唔認為lor
; U* x% y! w4 ~" ?; R' U( }# F: M  S( M) w/ ^$ K
唔係話要整死佢地/ x9 X3 b% Y/ I5 y# W9 p

6 l& S0 V+ \4 O# U# g2 o而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
( n% x7 q9 R4 |$ o% R
/ x; x/ G: C6 X2 F6 L" @4 z我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大! u3 o. L* P1 C4 q5 ~# P1 w

# l- q7 E  _" Y$ G$ H有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的& O* l6 d3 X4 C! D( B& J: q6 }

+ b% ?- P, q  X7 K8 k9 \/ y* X唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
* l* W4 }5 b# ]/ {
  M' p4 M- I# q( e4 r: |! D. V大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句& U3 i# i) d! T& x
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"* W# F  ]* b8 S9 R/ V
- k; T% W& o0 Y( D; t# M" }
我們的大學生+ q! u$ A3 Q* n' J0 _2 S" f

- @3 {) Z8 Y  s+ D+ X0 R: S
& |' [& x, o& }5 V6 D. r' O5 ^
( o* T) y) `% y) x/ M
, ~# ~% Q1 U4 C' G8 i8 W5 M: A. m3 I# ]) m

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
9 ~" z* L; l' W; o( b  w$ Y: V6 O! Q  ]+ R2 W

$ L! }2 E5 h" x4 l" j0 g- n3 K有見地 !!!6 |: u- ]3 ]1 J2 B
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html1 z( Y2 _/ o! @+ h

' [' W! W+ n% @+ X, z2 II think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. # B6 U1 {- X6 M" p& C9 {
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 1 {+ L- o) H( o- k) W
I pretty sad that about the University official." o3 d9 _- ^) R4 e3 C. C( r- X' S# M
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la. B2 G" R4 e. o0 N7 B1 D

! K* z) ?0 x3 @; P0 X& B4 d[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
1 s1 R8 i4 b! R+ K0 a我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
7 C% b/ d/ r) Q' V
7 f7 Z. ?- c' \; D[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

6 I; ]$ U  O5 ]/ |" c- _# g
8 t4 R2 z3 w. }+ t  R/ b
兩者有何分別?
1 x) p$ y  b( h* C1 Z  u中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?