奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
; H: _0 u2 x/ i( J( ?' _. I
  X4 ^4 f- P0 Eagree,: Z) ~3 y+ O# D4 n0 v2 U6 |( c% t
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,$ ^6 k2 l, b" @" L$ N
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
& L$ g  \7 M; N, ~  q, P, _, _期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

! d2 B' w% O) H2 E) x" U9 A: l4 Nhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html1 y) z8 F5 l; q' b
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
$ D; w3 k0 N5 ], B搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
) B( s! |9 e# L: o9 vJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
$ Q* R6 l  |2 W- E4 ^; j有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 8 U8 L6 m) i! S1 X5 j" y

7 D: ?, p% V2 {, t! p* g1 ^& C' i係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???" W2 ]: u# o7 l$ H6 R1 E' [/ B

$ m2 y! ^$ r6 }4 u" t* E為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

9 ~$ u# M8 L) m

  q3 M- h7 w2 J. `絕對支持啦
/ U; d$ Z/ B, Y' Z" h1 Z9 }# u9 X: I8 I- s" j5 ]9 }
有錯就認,打就企定
9 S/ B# L0 X/ q
2 e+ p$ y% n9 z3 c% t, F7 {無錯當然要撐到底7 k$ {4 x+ h; i1 s; p6 }
" w, b4 X1 T% B" A# b+ T
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩/ Z6 E$ n6 A; i1 ^! u
# U% N, I3 y, m
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
+ ?6 i' |4 Y; _4 F9 j# h: Q5 w9 {$ M# M8 b7 d
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
3 V) a! Y& K" y7 m# ?7 P. W% }. J* [3 f( c: \+ J% ]7 U( S
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
6 S, i) C; M1 A- c6 j, r8 h$ B: A- O! d5 K8 P5 q, ]
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?; X" f* a8 f5 W

% k8 N! O1 N; r$ g我唔認為lor8 k8 T5 x6 E5 K0 U

% o- S5 D3 j1 I0 y唔係話要整死佢地" v9 V. p7 b) @1 U* V! V: G, Z
6 `6 w& e/ h7 L, Z) o
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用$ k& w' {: g0 I
# S6 {# a4 \! e8 u# a7 e8 }
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大$ {' k# k) b% J
/ X% B  \6 c+ a9 W& R' P; R! N
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
. s5 y2 H9 X$ P7 F
( h" d7 W9 L, K( Q唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由7 e, f- |% c1 P0 G- a; x: y$ ?
  t2 s! x2 a7 R2 V, A7 c9 t
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
% r" H/ Q# f' U4 a"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
" s3 _$ q  Y# X4 }, k+ h) H$ U4 b2 |( Y* l3 K0 @8 Y
我們的大學生! }- Z9 a4 J% @, T6 X
7 }1 D" j5 \2 _/ `% s/ f, }/ M
( o6 F/ W9 }( x. ~! U: i2 W

4 r2 i4 P: ]3 n' c5 p" r2 u/ a* _, s# N9 C8 b% j( z! V

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
3 g; k, f/ W" U. ?! ]2 b( G
' _2 F/ g2 l# f
7 O; Q0 L) B/ U$ }7 i1 p/ p有見地 !!!
; o; J! Q  Q& k, X( C! ?現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
6 Y7 ~: i' h2 k
; c1 p8 E% G8 r; a6 lI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. # L1 X* h9 k: g4 K
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. " f6 z: D. l- p; y
I pretty sad that about the University official.
; m6 t. \: M! c& k5 b- b9 R+ mIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la. O" k! z3 a+ x2 R. l

0 S3 b. S  c$ N- V[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:7 w& |% P$ E2 Z; D3 Q& @
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
' [5 H* F" R9 `( H
7 y8 G; y2 M5 |7 B[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

: O5 P) p' [: L) O$ O
$ z) o9 A  j% B0 d' t  I8 N
兩者有何分別?: {; ]8 I9 V$ _" u* ]* _' H& H' a
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?