奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
$ k7 @" V$ t! k; Y; x( O" b
" x; E# P; {' q7 m& x1 ^agree,
6 \' G$ w/ X# A* J" U我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
$ S5 _3 K8 F+ j' ?但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,  {+ a# |- |# F2 `  o
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

0 L  r$ z: y8 k6 B3 Mhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html! C' O- b7 g+ Q6 m$ {: C2 f
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
, i0 s* G- l; C( ~: j7 x搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.) N& e  K" Z# T: E2 ^. S
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:/ k6 k% _7 k8 u+ O! o
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 6 {+ M3 K: M0 t

6 r) j" [9 q* b係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
7 W% X# X% V9 e4 C3 M
0 O' j: C+ L. F* Q為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

- M' Q9 ~+ z# ?( ^6 B! T7 d: K4 A9 S& A% y3 i$ }
絕對支持啦9 V: ?& {& a; d# E% ]
0 y6 z3 }$ z# J6 V" U6 ]
有錯就認,打就企定
, k% Q& N5 w( c; a: c8 S( w$ s. `: h
無錯當然要撐到底
* P9 R! S5 Y9 s3 r& C4 ]7 o: k) z  c) i
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
& Z8 D9 F& y( f
) J( b8 S. g- p5 a在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
) Y# @. e, j" S; K' }
( t7 B3 i! ~1 v0 d" B* Y一份公眾讀物係好有影響力4 S( q) a& |* M7 b7 D
" C, [5 C) J( s1 f! N* w
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生9 i& B3 a- R+ e) G. O; G' b* e
; S% H# W3 M- w4 p, d* A
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
' j6 X, L" |7 a9 ~7 O: z" d
, s, y4 H$ {" D* j; g我唔認為lor
7 _4 g0 e3 k) e; z6 Z3 N- S" h
7 ~, T+ c% ~, G0 g& K4 r0 N唔係話要整死佢地8 q( x1 d  N# z+ h8 T, O
# ?8 A! c; n6 q. E5 |4 l$ C  p
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
  k" M4 ^: t2 D+ `
8 y6 z' E6 ?4 v我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
. S4 j( a0 c' H2 E/ H* G% ]; D( y/ D0 j+ \( T( A
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
+ q+ d; ?7 T5 K0 m) J+ m
9 x' a: q. e  Y1 I: s唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由) F% P) o2 I- m7 m
0 Y1 y. o; L5 b8 `8 L9 O- o/ _6 C
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
* a0 c' d: J2 v7 m; r"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"0 @1 l7 }$ j/ x4 G

$ R, ?) }* v* R) B: V' [. U# }我們的大學生
% Z. }  N$ U2 A- f1 [2 A
( R2 r! n' \" u7 x
3 ]  b. L0 G* k! k+ o% u- Y; E; c, R$ O+ x2 }2 J4 ~

4 ~% \$ m* m2 _/ b# `

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
9 D# ^& c3 o3 N+ K* M- P2 F9 L% O; b0 ^2 S  ^( p8 g. ^5 I- M

  |9 i# E3 d# ~+ |; R; Z6 e有見地 !!!5 p/ U, v5 q# P/ c* X+ e1 C9 E% z
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
1 q3 w9 J  Q  O8 O7 Q' \& x! p# e' P1 z
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. & h/ N: N8 W5 ]) b- C
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
/ H4 m' V- D4 Q  H5 @3 Q: VI pretty sad that about the University official.
2 P; M3 R! l# ^; ~2 ZIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la9 R( h3 f4 h0 _
) C6 F& }9 ]  }4 L8 ~0 V
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
9 x4 Y' x. m4 j& `* D; y我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la/ a) i8 \5 ^- K2 {2 E9 Y+ f
; w0 J7 ^; f7 U1 C2 K
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

6 E" e+ }  z; d+ q8 |8 o# N$ L# w0 K  X; o* `9 @
兩者有何分別?
. R! e" F' v# V' l3 ?8 Y( w6 v中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?