奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
/ j! m- n. c( x3 Y0 Z$ a  K
* t2 B; @3 E8 i$ G+ t: Q$ M2 Vagree,
3 S8 S# L9 D1 Q' o& g4 C9 O我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
' k9 t0 v* v9 v5 P6 N# t但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
: W3 x, F$ F* a  R期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

$ ~- Q( W' q; h1 T1 `http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html, y3 D& H8 r; i' p
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地& ?: V7 ^* \3 c
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
1 ~+ ]9 u- x. _3 }6 }& F! p: wJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:6 g- r% b, P) }3 l$ M
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ & q# S3 f- K  ^

, K# {) O5 W2 D0 X* o係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???6 U- S" V8 n- z- m( ^1 }5 L% J

& d: X7 g9 S7 Y& Y& e: E為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

4 `$ M" C* v+ [) k  s8 l6 X; R; e7 r; N( z2 N* y
絕對支持啦
+ g: P( ~$ w7 i3 B
8 q4 _( _/ m5 N: R$ g( k) y: K有錯就認,打就企定
  l) F# O, [! S
1 m) U" W4 k) z0 f2 U- M6 N4 D無錯當然要撐到底# |: E% \* R  q0 y* W! ]5 U

9 ]" F5 r6 K5 D( J/ j/ g0 L但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩8 i( ]7 i; _+ u' \" Y" a
" G2 C4 |  D  t/ ?7 o* {: c
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得# h1 q" H/ }8 F" ^, w

' ]5 |# I; I, @- d" R! ^  i9 |一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
# F# M% h1 I/ t4 I# |$ d0 Q* m' A+ g; [9 j' k( |
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生- x% ~) M1 y* J: D

: `% }: _) `3 V唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
; C! P& u) G, v( r- U, t4 b/ P$ m$ |1 g9 d  y3 i0 P! ?
我唔認為lor+ L& u) T! e& b0 s; d3 H8 H9 v$ E

+ w' `2 m3 S& L" w8 ^0 r: R1 w唔係話要整死佢地
) ?9 {0 K" H! t% V0 f/ L
' b/ r% q/ b' \而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用5 ]8 K1 L; D6 p+ `# _3 X- C) n+ B0 ^

2 W' _+ s& M$ {6 \我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大$ C" z" u; O1 H( k
& k0 h  Y, A$ c& K  E" L# q9 Z
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的; Y' y5 K$ v- S* D4 x! }1 ^

9 h9 m) f( t' r0 t& K  K; r1 E唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由& N5 l0 W" A% J0 I) d$ K

' x3 R; \9 W9 w7 v+ B3 A( I大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
( F! {% v* \7 c"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
& q. a9 Z5 k5 d  H4 N
4 `) H- f, ^" g& m/ {( K! t2 \; `& |( a我們的大學生( r" Q. w, \$ x8 i, \9 q6 L; K
8 p( a  r0 @2 y' P( H
- R; P) Y0 t5 ?

  |% f( `8 m2 W1 }
8 a; G/ w* z1 [5 T( o6 C

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
& O! P3 y" I2 D" o1 N' M8 g1 k- C0 {4 x; V* c$ G2 B
! L& a4 N, G) A) |, R0 y, q
有見地 !!!: ?2 @' ?( F# H
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html; N* q- J& A! S/ f0 `# m' h. f
9 T3 W. W; B1 k" H
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. + |  K( u& ^6 Q' Y2 Y
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
2 L6 m: Q3 ~+ G/ t) u- z$ ]2 {I pretty sad that about the University official.
7 @$ [; c" F/ T) K2 x  N# gIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la% P! u- V3 u0 [$ n
& G- V( s2 _/ Z0 l; o6 V
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
, U3 o: v/ K6 y! e$ H/ K  F3 K我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
8 F# F8 O9 R) C% y0 X0 G. n4 D2 a
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

* x1 o: n7 D) ?  _) d

$ R1 ]7 k$ g3 e* o+ J兩者有何分別?
/ ?# N' F1 [" K& p4 L: d中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?