 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:0 ]8 e2 F1 c: q4 z0 T5 H
+ g8 r9 e# p* d/ f& r( b
* P2 G) ]2 i1 c% G同意.) }4 S/ }& z3 c2 X8 e' J, r
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... - N$ i( m8 B4 X& X
% T, \. }: i% v/ c3 N! @% |
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.' O/ c3 j5 _/ t) `: L
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
/ Y5 x6 y# e7 r' ~9 P6 NI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.- P( Z# e( _4 @6 L% \ P: L; s
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.$ g2 z, X. |# }9 r# x
$ b1 x. r4 r! n& x/ l2 v z
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law0 q. z& ]' N/ Y# O k
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
9 p3 ?- K' A% l8 z( w) T6 w3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
) v+ X2 Q" J1 Q: C+ O, i- G4 f) N3 Y" N6 e1 P5 }
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|