Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
' T, W4 n; p4 r* A- R
- J% G, {' t* s  S6 S* B. A. [6 G; g4 x% K7 D. h
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

' Y( q$ D9 @# `$ ?* D: T! q& T' q8 v" ]2 X8 [$ B3 {
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:* R8 V- U$ E% R# y

! C& o1 V% Q- A- C  h. \) I7 N8 q* j& T+ U
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ |6 d; ^' k0 A" [* Z& b9 d; U  A

; [$ z! {. V4 [8 woh really...
# D8 H; S! |/ |1 u6 l2 v+ N* khahhaa, thx a lot^^"
' u: Z% \# c: u( a$ m" vi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
% O3 m; {# L4 P7 c7 h5 X. {2 v) x: m/ y; y
當然這是個假設性問題6 o& M7 t/ D$ \* a
但將人數倍大
9 q% h" W. E) n7 }例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個- ~+ L) J) A& J( o- N
(情況可以換作其他)$ A' V) x7 X$ d" S4 j
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...' D7 [- H- ~" ~  d+ M4 Y. M/ U
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...$ `& Z! B7 S" ^* F, e0 _6 Y
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:. U: v) e; S$ Y
絕情谷既問題...
, a/ ]6 v* P( M+ w. ?如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
" ]* z) B  S6 }: g4 w# r% Z+ N如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

0 @( X6 s6 f' X; X
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好' P* ]& p6 l& h' b0 d+ H* ~5 _
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
; q  l8 e+ H( e5 r0 {6 \' ]  a但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
, }0 f7 c7 E/ u" D) D- ^好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢7 w0 r6 O; c6 W
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
! b" B& s+ v% g* Q% l5 D
% R6 F' \# O4 [8 m我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
7 z' M# P9 ]) N4 ^& P, `/ d, |不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:2 D* _  C, k1 G/ e
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

& `3 c4 V, w, n+ L: Y
/ D; G; {* r6 w2 Y% J) ]7 @8 Thaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣: `4 t( G8 ^7 J# C& O) V4 N2 A' l
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
2 ]1 V! j3 c  _+ I% n4 ]0 X  m" D! J
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child9 L* Q" c8 J6 i- ?9 T
yes, my reason is helping more$ Y0 Q; G! O5 y' @* l6 G9 X: v" x9 c
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
: v* R' k+ P# m. Oif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
1 s% J: u2 J, s7 y4 ybecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
& f+ [8 T, p0 a1 [also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!+ Q# F! {1 z8 _+ c) x7 I8 l
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!* Z* s' l( l1 ?5 |4 c
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
  A( {# c- F5 ?0 I: `當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~, s% O3 B. h; _% D
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~. C  g. c0 d9 [2 Q. S
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
% X4 P7 }( B# \% i即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~9 h/ \9 c7 B  }9 x
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~) P* G8 Q1 E6 z
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~2 R. @8 I) u; z3 k1 f( p* T
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）