Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:5 \0 N; ^& ^4 |% j2 D

  E4 S6 X5 F# c& D6 @$ u
: k; j5 C2 q- Y8 P( Y我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

6 u$ x8 _, C% U, j/ h4 Z- @
) u0 b! d) L$ q  i: H
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:" t/ s. Q5 w5 {1 Y+ i  J, ]7 e& R
6 i% w4 @. s! q3 r
1 h  X/ K: u3 o8 n
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

3 Q, q" j& L" V# {8 J
9 R8 Z& v- ?- g6 g, G8 c+ B4 {oh really...1 Q( A( H  T6 G# K
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
/ ^  U! g) d% T( W) x0 Q" Ri didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題' y( K4 ?5 {" |$ ], }( L

+ ^) ^5 c( Q/ `" ?2 {6 M當然這是個假設性問題2 P& h4 E- |/ n* T0 w' }7 o  E
但將人數倍大
5 M7 ?# Q# c2 V% C例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
' s+ e5 ?& @! E$ X) F) I- B6 T# f4 ](情況可以換作其他)
$ y; d1 m/ W' |0 z( A5 t" l0 m0 d! j始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題..." r' Q3 E! ^3 w/ l, G
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
% C+ b" x" q: k- y8 ~1 o如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
- I  E5 e; F' I% y, d絕情谷既問題...+ v9 g, l0 z+ q; {
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
. q: \" e8 W& a2 F如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

% g6 u2 W2 \1 i+ c
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好  k" J" S/ r6 X
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
/ x: O$ m3 f' F1 c但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
) {, j- E. ?  I9 R* a7 @好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢- e! h+ A7 X+ U
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢+ u4 F$ I$ v0 w2 U) j9 E7 M1 s, \
- @" g. ?. j& @9 E4 @- `( z
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命& d8 t! V; B& s( ?7 l
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
# P1 r5 ^* o7 R, }" Y: L. q其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

6 v% m9 R; d; i2 }, g$ M( G+ I9 \0 X7 V0 |
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
" u- Y2 c& r* W2 Y: q你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
) d2 ?7 D! l* B* S' G& Y/ t) t- u1 Z. ]2 a" b5 g1 K
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
, U' \0 n  t2 P  h' z- o& L* Cyes, my reason is helping more  d* k; r5 z; G
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
% P' a- g0 b3 Q! N5 hif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child% }0 T0 E" ~. _" T
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
$ j& T$ g" O, U5 x" e. zalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
2 N5 g2 `$ R5 |- J3 a, x' tmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!% P# X- T4 |0 V4 A
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
7 ]1 x: t# b* d: B; q# v" A當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~/ p0 a. e3 M, n+ Z
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
5 u' h" W  p: O5 I) n正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~, a" _& U; G" W8 K  `
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~0 c( a. I/ g( d5 H* x" Y( {' P
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~5 z0 a# o/ Q- N* O% x
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~4 `" B# M5 c' V# x% o: i" k7 \
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）