Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:* T. a$ I! g4 `- O' r
( [3 H4 M9 _3 [1 H  j2 E6 W/ W% k

# s1 [! f. l9 [: {; }, B( I6 k/ J4 R我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

/ p- T. k2 U0 N6 F+ A( O' U. F( b8 b7 {
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:8 f- ~  V0 U, z9 \; P9 f

& j( A4 l$ R0 c, T, S" r4 e; I# ~4 V2 o) E
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

; }9 D1 J& M3 v
8 o: \8 X& q# g% u. e# G5 ]
oh really...
5 V4 t% {$ b, H4 i  shahhaa, thx a lot^^"' c  I# {) [9 l1 X
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
  n/ U" f! p& c# d
$ f+ @3 V1 ?" y3 S% Q當然這是個假設性問題9 I* Q: v7 F+ z
但將人數倍大/ c6 {" K" U% Q) t& S3 x
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個/ b1 q6 e) N/ u& ^
(情況可以換作其他)
  x. r) n. E) D0 I. @% `) ]" \7 S2 S始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
4 C( B6 V# t$ b1 [: n如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
. m% _( X* U  R& l4 }4 O' |9 ^8 Q2 K如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
7 Y. `% y1 q6 @3 g( [, @+ _& N: \$ L絕情谷既問題...
  `$ e1 N9 C2 X4 K如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
' Q) N. u- ^% E$ P# }$ j. H) _% I如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

$ a" n4 j) T0 @- q7 M8 ^( w
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好  J7 p0 O: u% {
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
) [$ V) P# A* _1 b但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
1 u: V+ L! r+ V& l0 L% b好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢- R, _2 x& S: q  P
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢- d: U; q+ Y' Q1 A7 l- V
' W1 V  G. V' b- B; \
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
7 l" o/ Z, U: X8 }, r( y不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:" F' b+ c: r. t- n; @
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

, X4 t* X- Q: U5 n6 k

8 b, n5 v, w& I$ ?: ^6 ~. n! M. jhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
' c1 q2 J- N0 J( R: t你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
% I' C' c6 J3 X/ F/ Y' y
) S0 Q+ A7 Z0 m& K: J* }; Xp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child5 c" l. z4 P3 c' e* |: c3 _3 x+ g
yes, my reason is helping more
) P% q% O1 c4 z0 Qfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
; u+ D8 [) s0 y7 hif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child# F1 [; h) G% X5 `6 f' h
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
8 g  s5 n: W. v  jalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
, |* t  ]( d3 P1 y% A$ ?1 ~' ]7 dmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
- _7 @* j. T" Dunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
) ]/ R: e( ~& f! j' U* \9 n+ c當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~' Y7 T- h2 y" ?
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~  k: }6 c8 K- c: c4 I  t
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~3 {/ W, w/ @/ c; @" O/ H; E8 W
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~3 x, ^2 T2 F7 n4 n8 w1 N9 A
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~9 e. H" O4 ^! M2 n% S5 m
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
' m0 l8 Q! r7 R/ h我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）