Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:! ]2 w1 ?# F- i6 n7 _+ _

; r: }; I$ V8 B
* F! ~3 s5 @/ E+ W& i我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

% M; ]- D  @/ e7 E# c$ C$ K# f* j( o' T. \0 J2 Y2 H
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:8 p/ o4 |5 j3 |' Z* G# e
) m! J3 f/ I) b) p4 {* m; d

6 G% v& U3 e; C! t$ rIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

0 G2 ?0 ^: q6 `5 `+ K$ Y
2 g  f/ ^* f) E3 [5 V" K& V$ d  Qoh really...
+ ?, C- [3 i0 E) }( U$ p& q( N- ahahhaa, thx a lot^^"
! T2 m9 j2 @7 d" ~0 b+ @i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題' |8 V% ~. P- D1 p' G' `+ F
* O  a+ U# V! G, ^7 n
當然這是個假設性問題
1 G; a+ }4 a- }" z- g) k# o3 Y但將人數倍大
) z$ r  n, O; q# k3 i例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個6 Z" S/ r  p1 i, Q: ]0 {& ?
(情況可以換作其他)
; Q  D, f& N) d  b0 K5 k始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...4 X1 y4 p7 J' z% B+ m
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 O2 A" I9 X+ i+ o* Z如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
" m7 n3 ~! E' n! u7 L絕情谷既問題...
- F& \' v* ~" U/ R) T/ U如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
( X% h4 p. z- u9 t0 a3 i; ^, D  q如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

  _" A: [* S0 K: e  |7 i
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好% I" L) |/ P# B# A" b( J
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
8 t# [5 M" C3 v' K& p7 c5 P4 T但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
" |" m* P) {; J! t/ d% ^/ I好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢) m9 K8 |- k* ~1 @4 W
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢; e8 R' I9 r- X; w7 Q$ `* A

& B% C2 c1 L% I' X我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
4 ^6 [+ S; x, k- d不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:- t! i) N( C4 Q' @
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

0 ^3 B6 a- u( i6 x5 ~6 f

) E9 J& r& R6 K8 @haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣1 c- b! w- p4 N* T% y0 \# R
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
$ i4 W/ ~( P0 X0 t5 Z  v& }4 F( }* I! X: o) T1 @1 Z* E
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
/ {6 r4 l% e  O! Ayes, my reason is helping more
& ?; o  p' G& n0 K. Efor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
/ Y- _( ], b- J$ @6 y: E. ^if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
7 i! o' |. M: s7 O2 m" Xbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?: {5 l; ^. R9 |' P( P6 R& N
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
  g. S* |4 |! r8 @' Y$ Mmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
# g( y& E) i' |6 g1 B1 zunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~( c8 n, z5 i# Z+ D' }
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~- v0 o* r" O: e  n8 O
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
! C: Y0 X" q- d! Q正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~4 l9 R8 u/ r& {
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~, V, c; m. }) `; R# Y# E2 r5 I& w1 [
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
0 [$ h$ M5 K  d: U2 \, p2 g0 ?但如果o係當時o既情況中~~- b! s" A* e' q
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）