Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:# l( W, U# [2 m4 X8 s9 A. L6 }: C. v; w

; t. {5 E8 U1 {' d: C
  F0 V# b, ^  j+ k/ u我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

8 u* T( r  P8 O. h; e- B: F! W
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:5 S! `* A- @( s( p+ ^- E
$ p# S, J( H; v) j+ M) Q

) s* j5 S) t7 \4 f( bIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

! i3 r" \2 |7 `5 m5 N) m
3 M9 }; D3 o. P6 k) h+ O/ c/ N4 }
oh really...# c. E- ^" U: ~
hahhaa, thx a lot^^", q: b6 S; A4 K( ?% e
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題# i$ r. V. p1 `4 x  P, l- D
) j; n( V; `( Y3 n2 S! D
當然這是個假設性問題6 w( u! }; d: ^1 ~6 m4 @" L
但將人數倍大
' J3 i2 N$ ?8 y& {$ D3 D例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個' S$ u: k# T2 @$ v8 V% \
(情況可以換作其他)- i/ }: ]; B+ k- \8 }5 s
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
# @/ o$ A/ [# w: x  V! b) r如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
4 E" U6 S8 h; A& V6 j& u如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
5 N$ X* V7 {, h  r: E絕情谷既問題...
1 y( T- m, W8 Q9 W如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...# \) ^! X1 H. v9 V9 U
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

  g3 E/ H9 `+ V' K/ y6 k* K* \$ K殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
' {, O( k* C: y, \: Y於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生% Q# L; R# Q, h1 o0 T( q0 @  p6 P
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩  z& W) h5 ~; ?
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢3 L0 a! B0 l2 E& Q. G/ E
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
. p' u4 s/ a* _- d* E" F7 Y
. d" ~+ a8 `) Z2 t( u我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
: J  z2 b5 I8 O! v/ p: l( m不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
, ]5 j. q, l4 e5 r- t1 E其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

# K0 W, O; a" w! N6 Y2 t, L, u" `
4 p( L, B4 a$ j8 z) I
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
% f9 m# i& b( Z5 N0 |9 H- B你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
5 l9 |/ Y- s/ _& c+ |8 `) t& }' R* W; C& S# ?/ |
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
. H* L3 X  p' }4 ~( Kyes, my reason is helping more
' Z4 Q3 ]0 z/ F' Hfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
6 q1 _6 f- A# uif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child% _1 D& |2 K* q  l+ J- w% P
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
. B/ u( F6 K, {6 [also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
4 D5 O. L- ~/ x1 wmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!  ?9 Q, G0 B0 t
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~/ d1 z+ r* T+ E! D8 X
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~2 R2 }3 ?- n; h
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~# R" ~: _/ _" ~* J: ~7 P4 p
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~$ r- }' J6 J6 \9 G6 z# x) @
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~9 v$ S& J2 f0 k  E8 v5 d* t
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
& O' }8 r, e! o. o- V但如果o係當時o既情況中~~9 ]- M4 I8 X* \5 L' K
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）