Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
. l" ?# `0 A, t8 W( u: t: ?  c% L5 l9 a$ ?. G% H4 \2 g
* \4 K! O! T+ Z9 L$ k
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

2 c  |, u+ T; J$ w) l* K" ^$ H9 h3 ]0 }3 F, |. u! ]8 O
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:5 s! A% b& N7 f0 e2 k' I9 u; h5 G
: e& V5 d" K0 q: }  H: R) x' c* t

& k' q( {5 j  I4 O0 s1 A5 O- q* gIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

' n& S7 E) W2 ^7 a( o
! B/ m: ~0 ^: k7 m$ K, _0 w; A
oh really...6 B; p1 d3 a$ I6 l- L/ Y
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
0 U; h& I: L% V% T4 x7 [1 ^i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題6 A) \/ ]( ~6 s

1 @5 S$ W9 Y9 v3 W. u+ ~, a當然這是個假設性問題
/ V! W4 @; A8 }: k0 j( ?但將人數倍大
: O0 w0 }  W& d5 b9 q% ~! E例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
7 E) u2 V1 d* `6 g/ x(情況可以換作其他)5 ]* {; G! ^$ E9 B2 `* n
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...5 ]0 w# `; x+ Z
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...+ F1 r' a; R4 ~  i4 U# Q
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
; m4 `0 K) @7 j; X絕情谷既問題...
( y  @1 q0 ?$ I! s如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
1 K  V# W+ u, ]8 W4 P如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

( ~/ {" C6 U* ?3 {# R  {殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
9 O2 |+ |8 H- _$ g  p* o; J$ K於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
( V  D# q3 r8 c! _& P但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
& z- i7 V& b( }5 ~; Q好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
; c* K4 u. c, G" b# [其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
* l3 o1 _7 t0 ^. {4 R  e8 `7 \! e2 B0 t
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
+ f9 n6 P+ P- w8 ?9 y+ @2 y$ O! _# W3 Q不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:; H3 }! E1 }3 d7 U
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

" y6 T8 l) |3 b+ O* T$ |1 }7 ^' V& R9 k8 U5 C1 b5 f1 a- U4 z
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣# v( Q3 v, b; y
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
* F( G3 \7 V% W9 c5 `1 Z/ K2 J! h1 b- u- t+ ^5 {+ d9 v& ?
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
$ h7 G1 E) p1 F! o! l3 K+ ~yes, my reason is helping more
' `( I+ l: `7 M) i1 S  Nfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!8 x2 _3 _& h. K* \) O2 F
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child* p5 |; Q0 L. |4 i! b
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?1 l$ s  [; }6 H7 e8 B  r  H
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
; G, e# l( Q* M: N: X, rmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!7 g; ?- k$ G5 h
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
2 |- \( R. w. I* q! M當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
. |2 p! d5 o1 ?$ A我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
1 Z( O0 m8 |" _正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~3 G9 e4 E- W+ v  ]
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~7 j) v2 w5 ?5 w& n
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~, l: [! h! @. z6 ~4 ^
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~5 H; X" M( A# }
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）