龍九州

盡早實施採用電子儀器解決就唔洗咁多xx啦!

打狗棒

下下要問旁証，不如學美式足球咁睇錄影帶？
不過富咸球迷起哄，唔做野又唔得，換左係車仔主場，呢球波實當入啦；
呢d咪叫”主場威力”囉．．．．．．　

cfccfcc

最唔順氣係.....
車仔對西布朗 - 車仔球員走去"圍"球証(因為Makelele被侵犯)就比足總罰
但係呢次Fulham的球員又係一樣去圍球証,就無事發生
唔會比人罰........有無人可以話比我聽點解??

brightlee

Originally posted by cfccfcc at 2006-3-21 19:48:
最唔順氣係.....
車仔對西布朗 - 車...

Everytime that's liking this..
I am not talking about Chelsea......

IS EVERYTIME, EVERYTEAM .... that in this kind of situation.......

The players on other team........ that they would try to talk to the referee, saying blah blah blah.....

Sometimes, that's NO excuse...

if that's fault.......... you can't blame anymore.......

Open your mind please....

cfccfcc

open mind for what??
while one team will not be charged for this
but the other team will be??
whats the rule?
wheres the rule??
i agree to what jose said~
there is a rule for 19 teams and another rule for chelsea

brightlee

sorry, you are too bias..................

I know you are Chelsea's fans........

but you can't be too bias...

Looking clearly the situation..

If Man utd scored a goal like this @Stamford Bridge
You would agree Chelsea players' running to the referee and arguing for that situation....

Azuma

我有睇埸波
其實我地又唔係旁證我地都唔知道佢睇到定睇唔到
如果佢話睇到
大家又可能話"咁都睇到"
如果話睇唔到
"重播一睇都知係啦"



無一個答案可以滿足到車迷同非車迷

不過
我自己覺得
球證吹呢場波的赤道好唔一致


仲有
其實打波係咁.....................
有越位,無越位
打多個球證..........................
成日都發生
我係車仔迷
如果佢地把握得好,打得好o的
今場又點會輸.........................


Great comment +3

[ Last edited by brightlee on 2006-3-21 at 08:48 PM ]

iknow

杜奧巴球波根本就係手球ｌａ，富咸去理論有咩問題？
加拿斯痴線ｇｅ，杜夫同希古臣爭波，佢就撞埋去，幫手爭波使唔使咁ａｒ？抵佢攞ｇｅ張紅牌！

cfccfcc

Originally posted by iknow at 2006-3-21 06:56 PM:
杜奧巴球波根本就係手球ｌａ，富咸去...

理論無問題......不過問題係
點解車仔理論就罰....富咸理論就唔罰?
呢個唔關我係唔係車仔球迷事
可唔可以找一個人比個好d0既答案我?

大家做的都係圍球証理論~
點解一隊罰-一隊唔罰?
我唔係講緊應唔應該圍球証
而事實上係兩隊都同樣有做左相同的事
點解會有不同的對待???

jordi

莫佬咁勞氣 , becox o羅唔到 100 分奪冠所致 !
不過 , wright-philips 真係冇場好波 .....
反而 , joe cole 就替他不值 .