Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:6 ~2 [! S9 a( o9 n! W; }

' ]0 E/ {4 J2 s0 I6 A5 k) Y
" V, s- p9 e8 S7 Y- q我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

! {* o( y" Y& w! F1 u- Q0 b; P% g* v; Y! D' g9 i
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:0 ?8 v! L9 f, j& ], S  |
6 g: q( g( m. p" `! l3 K
  e. G0 [) S! U" |% s* g7 k( M
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

  l+ R, L" q8 ^" G8 y5 W: S% H: Q" b
oh really...
) ^& G+ ]* G, O& b) P+ thahhaa, thx a lot^^"
9 `" H9 p# O; ki didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
/ ?  P, ~3 ?' d' ^3 T7 B$ v
( X2 e6 [/ v$ ~( u當然這是個假設性問題8 @4 y: I$ Z4 a7 @- m- D
但將人數倍大
9 b+ I% @8 u9 N) w8 m6 i例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個3 A4 }; j2 m" W% P, M6 D4 a/ s1 h
(情況可以換作其他)
$ r- S. t' a* E' I( R$ g. X" j始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題..." I& C" r8 V0 j1 [
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.... X; D9 w/ ?& R" ~
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
& F7 {# {- b. I9 T' z絕情谷既問題...  F5 X" [; F* f% u7 `, B  @
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
$ K. ]  }1 |# r* ~# [& H如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

* o/ ~  q$ Z: i7 A" D, I. K殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好6 w! P7 B4 G5 l5 X& @* {+ V# K
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
( ^& h! e7 G$ S( c但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
$ U7 P0 F) A9 l( h0 t6 V) h5 ]好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
" C+ }! `, W+ ~5 x  U9 d其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢3 v' `% I' {+ u. w

9 k$ \9 _2 Q, }- u* D/ k3 x我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命- Z4 q2 Q* n1 b# ]% R! ~$ T8 k
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
4 K& h/ A/ g  O5 l其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

1 t8 a/ N/ q8 o7 b' e) O! v, p, \3 z) c! ~2 n! _9 h+ u
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
6 n5 X" l- y# |6 i) V; g你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....2 ~: a6 K% R! q7 R6 |9 O
' n. q, u! F% G. E. n
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
& p& z0 I( |& N" cyes, my reason is helping more) H9 ]5 |! Q; }& ~
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!1 i5 U3 z; D( x2 j: x
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
* G4 p2 ^1 \9 i/ Ubecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?% ?" p/ _# g9 U# ^- @  _6 X8 k
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!+ A' q3 W: j5 b5 s0 |# l
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
5 T. b# R9 d) E- J) [" _under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
5 H$ R0 |2 v7 r0 F" f4 w. N當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
$ U: m/ q  K. r' h- y6 Q我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~# p) M# Z; p1 n4 P1 [2 {2 D$ b' j. O
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~, ]5 K! ]* y" l
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~% q* ?: l9 t+ G: Q+ q" g
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~6 g* v- t# `, j3 J- S
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~3 a$ r( [1 \- P& D- y, D/ I/ u4 F) m
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）