Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
8 K, z2 u+ V9 Y! J  f" ]" W) `! G; @5 l; w" I* K9 z$ @/ |
. ?5 Z; W, n9 ^5 R/ X
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 ?8 E. x5 ^- }+ o6 I3 S# W+ W0 z% m& K8 }. U
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:! ]3 }  Z, Z5 K: s

0 K. t5 J1 T$ s, x. I; A
* s5 q5 y7 M, u* z) G4 ]In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

2 K* ]6 D9 \/ ?2 u4 O* i  a
( O, P5 B" |0 A( l1 V9 Toh really...
6 _9 D& c8 ~: Z0 S8 ohahhaa, thx a lot^^"  u% D% ^! \) ~0 U! a7 t
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題5 k& k5 l7 o$ g0 y
  `, E, g. {* l9 O) Q
當然這是個假設性問題
7 {  y% G/ G3 D/ b: q: `3 G0 W但將人數倍大9 u" s# x" v( v' w( G! M- p
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
& ~8 I. H4 Z* f(情況可以換作其他)
7 A- _& t4 ~7 o6 X9 I始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
7 Y4 l3 |! Q, I" Q如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
' o" ?- J( j; W% X( f如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
% X; ~2 u( t" F8 t+ t8 }4 {8 v絕情谷既問題...
. g& A* h6 x$ c( b0 p0 u如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
: J# C9 c1 T5 e如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

, b3 G$ f6 Q1 z( N% R( j. i
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
: D+ ~( h0 _4 A4 p; i於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生8 F6 _! ]3 }6 }. v
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
( P5 X% e/ h/ Y# F3 t. {" z好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
. r- k, @/ a" k0 d. a/ D其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢$ c* z) y* v0 y0 R
* |1 \0 L, l; f7 k$ J) y( @( W3 T
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
2 x1 y) k  `$ T+ E5 e5 b/ Q不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
0 M/ L/ r; ^: f' E其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

, t- ~* z, W1 D- A0 {$ x1 \" b0 y5 ^0 w
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
# B  Q5 p5 h* i8 ]  T& a7 ]9 ?你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
& D$ K0 _5 b8 G, t- P7 }" h0 o. l( }. u7 m3 o# s+ f# i$ F
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
1 B3 G* q5 U3 \2 _# |# hyes, my reason is helping more
) I6 T4 G9 J, r. L4 ?; X( O# r, R5 Jfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!% N5 }+ Y0 U9 G
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child* s+ h7 j) d6 ?' v- [! O
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?0 M! I7 V& D8 x& `; M/ w
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
* x% q% f2 y0 y# C# q' Qmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!: e% Y$ @1 t1 E- G
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
5 k# p0 U0 y# Y5 K當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
, K- J8 f0 O- R3 I3 X我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
2 G6 v- ~5 M- Z% T正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
9 I; L/ P% O) q2 L& c即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~4 `" P/ \4 j* x2 w2 M. G3 I8 S! t
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~4 J' q: f, }( M& l
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~$ m. P$ p7 D$ }' M5 E: e+ ^$ W0 l
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）