Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
+ j9 ?, U7 X% Q5 J
0 M* c( @6 `; d; F4 T; b. v% R- D; A5 t/ _5 T/ _
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

2 D$ ~0 i- G0 f' I' u1 J3 ]- s
! q: a3 ?+ f( f0 y
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:0 R% C4 T/ d. a* Y( U( v- t

, `- q* H( O, v4 Q2 G4 E) x$ m1 W8 [) d0 t4 M% {; f
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

$ G* c* c( L+ Q8 U& v  w9 S2 ]. z- a. f/ v& _0 j
oh really...) d! V+ W" H% [1 a* f( L. O  B/ g
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
3 K, ~& u% n9 w; {% j$ e, |i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題/ m8 E% ]1 b3 M% n' O

3 K8 b9 \( Z% P9 ]( N) x5 ?# J當然這是個假設性問題
( x; u; S( T  [! t  Z但將人數倍大
7 G1 m  O& }  I8 g. V0 d& S例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
) C% K# ]6 w% r(情況可以換作其他)
$ e; G6 x/ }( g% g# ]& V始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...( Q! g1 z0 j+ Z
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...* n9 n; T: C. w; E) Y
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:5 T7 N" T2 Y2 T7 _
絕情谷既問題...
4 p* m4 e7 u! X9 f; w; a" G如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
* E9 _. H- P$ d) p! t9 m3 O6 u3 f如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

- |2 z' v5 \; m6 H' s/ v殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好* N* j0 D0 h) _+ ?8 W( i
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生6 p% [/ v7 w7 T$ _5 r. K( B
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩; Q3 B+ j6 K+ z+ }1 r
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢6 m9 z2 ^/ n4 v; C6 y$ d
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢" S( ]3 Z- e2 O- h. O

. \, Q8 b4 f: B9 r9 d0 p我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命% i' _" x: z' i. N7 w. h3 a/ `
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:$ h- J  Y7 r  {( T6 G8 Q9 C3 i; b! ^
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

8 y2 ^: `5 l) E; _
5 k1 o) b* |6 O4 O5 S7 r5 t- whaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
% N- O3 |8 n2 B$ y/ g你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
8 A3 w& |2 k+ \. B  G3 e2 w% u' D+ p# o2 R( V
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child0 N) o! t" i& B7 `$ n1 c) g
yes, my reason is helping more' h# l5 f5 G+ D8 o: }4 I8 F3 W: v
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
- Q$ p# W( B& ]' a6 E! x5 eif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child" T  o1 L/ I$ k( j
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
  |; R  L  W; D  [. Malso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
  u% b7 ?$ c3 A0 J, v) u4 Ymay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
  W9 X0 m. J# B' Runder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~$ e& k, D: ^5 Z
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
( Z) Q+ X  `3 _3 ?, _; C3 G我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~( s$ @. N" a& s- ]# Z* q
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
; k% }. o: h  p. u8 |7 m: ^即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~1 O* m$ M9 U' k' E1 V/ l
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
7 @4 F0 f, d( g2 t: J* \但如果o係當時o既情況中~~# l- f0 F! a, n7 A: R8 m
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）