Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:. [! V/ D: r5 _' L
! n/ S) L. p" L7 d

% `+ a8 Q, \1 \. ?, o我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; N3 E- X3 g; I# ^- {9 k9 Q' P1 o4 \, O1 B% G
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:7 {- Q' `& b/ p; R: o; q
; s9 S' V, y# P2 |/ i0 p0 x
: j" s( w! D/ ?  I* W0 Q
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

) x/ R+ y1 ]# y( Q" Q2 C
# _8 W, l1 s4 Z9 Y) f- Z- ^# F3 D
oh really...
5 I; R0 S& f5 R! A3 @0 Ehahhaa, thx a lot^^"" C* M' A! \' h4 I/ `; a% d( t* W% X
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題" X0 s. R" g( M: Y" B  l! M. ]

/ X. u+ r8 j, }當然這是個假設性問題
) d8 L- q/ X. N& @- P5 d* M* q( H但將人數倍大- ?* D/ x3 V1 Q
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
9 n' E) v% `# m! f* _( Z# H8 {(情況可以換作其他)
7 j" i1 ?0 y$ ^5 y% j' |, g始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...- a2 J( j* r& R' i: N5 Z2 k
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
( c' O' ]1 H" D- H6 F% Y+ _5 B3 K如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:0 t# U* q! U6 c4 O5 {. g. l$ Y
絕情谷既問題...
3 `* U- K1 C/ f9 L: c; M. p. h如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...% p# ]! a  S/ a$ j/ [
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

) B4 V& m$ |9 r4 d, ~5 @殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
" L$ c0 M2 C; B於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
7 L  h, {* w  w- W5 b" l但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
0 _1 w# Q9 H4 W/ \7 z6 q6 c好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
: y- X+ v, }: ^% {其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢% j6 [( P4 b2 U) B1 ~9 o  s2 z

% T$ \8 Q$ A7 }  i我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命( W- |4 ?- |0 L; l4 G9 K! y
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:' ^9 r) S' Q/ j- `" t) F: w
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

$ _, \. H' V- ^% ]8 u
8 ^- V5 f2 u" l% _
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
* m: F8 S7 ?" e0 L你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
. Z: m" p, H0 d* E7 e8 A/ S- V7 H; d6 @/ p4 Y& P/ F
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child! N6 k4 r; \: Q. ?+ x! e; L
yes, my reason is helping more
0 Z9 W6 j# w5 \) t8 y, hfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
* C/ `# J$ @0 r9 C9 [. Mif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
( w7 j* w8 J+ S; O& I7 f, hbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
* \: G. W0 @/ I/ e0 Ealso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
+ B6 u# `8 _1 U3 A6 v% c! hmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
" V: H  }& d0 U) l- c( T) L( punder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~3 H, G. g' \; {; e7 H& ^
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~, b1 q) F5 g) r0 Y* L5 u( ^
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~) S$ H( u+ \/ r: G# ^8 p. j  Q" j
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~0 g! B" ~& H) t6 q: ?! z" k
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~) L  P6 A* f" A! j  k% h8 ^4 X
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
, l% g$ V4 z1 _9 s* Z7 e但如果o係當時o既情況中~~0 L. E9 w! F8 Y8 s2 u1 u
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）