Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:4 a5 l. E+ H: k- [2 A# {! H* W
7 \( Y7 }* U( P$ e. W/ f$ N, B) x/ J
' s, s, A! B1 h" m8 u" C2 v- i1 D
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

2 h3 s9 x/ s6 G$ D" F5 }9 Z4 |; k$ {, b/ i
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:! c: h( u) U1 u3 }2 @# y8 @

: }- x7 I, o2 g# `
8 L6 B$ d( Z7 u5 h' U( DIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

" b) X8 A4 b( ?& H5 Y+ W7 |. V+ m# ?8 {( ]( \7 L
oh really...: Z: Y( Q" N: X8 Z0 M
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"( y  M) q6 ?3 S% J) \' X5 a6 W
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題6 {( g/ U; T/ u, H

8 X7 q* \- f1 o' r- F' u當然這是個假設性問題0 u1 q, T3 }1 [# k5 m& N# e+ e* p
但將人數倍大8 ?( I0 p- p9 U0 p* w5 g" z
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個% B8 k' T' p% N  A" a
(情況可以換作其他)# l# `; v3 r8 Z# f: Y
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
9 t8 n8 ~9 ?2 z+ ~% J如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
1 ?/ H- x. ~4 f0 `$ r. F. V+ X8 l/ c如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:# n+ b0 v, p5 n# l$ x% c) E
絕情谷既問題...
: m) A6 j0 n+ k如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...( A) ?+ I' r' F- j& v  p
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

, S7 ^; A* M, R  h+ Y% ?殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好+ V5 P+ d) \! B* K
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
( x$ `7 I3 V9 t# M& _但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
  n1 c0 Z) ~  A好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢: h  d" z, e  o/ _$ \/ {. V
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢2 @6 h* `4 ?5 M4 |5 ~8 ]
1 R' T% F; f# J5 R
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
8 h3 [& w, [5 p* O9 ]2 S不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
5 z" n) `  ^* K; F! ]% G! ^其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

: e+ X/ ~" @' v# `6 [

) P0 A- \6 Z. D5 O3 O( fhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
! k- t7 l2 G/ [% |1 ^你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....* @7 m1 ~$ }! L/ W$ O/ E  ~* x

% U& r9 G) x" J. k% ]. hp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child7 j* z- j$ ?4 C. w, _7 }" \
yes, my reason is helping more
/ E! p0 l# i$ L/ C# G/ ifor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
) y. R/ {& H; x) c* M4 g; B& `& T4 sif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
/ N! P/ |; ]2 Ebecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
3 F# T/ q8 E: a1 s4 g$ dalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!. g& J3 O/ W7 z! r! C6 _
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
2 ~5 s' T) A* N& \- w% e/ r9 r3 [under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~* X$ ?* C7 g7 w
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
4 g* x9 d) S, B+ z我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~/ {  ~9 e+ F+ |: J2 R
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~4 T% c, l( F! z+ a' {
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
) H0 E; Y1 a, N2 `我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
$ s, h& a5 N0 _2 K0 |但如果o係當時o既情況中~~( W1 U2 s9 X/ j6 o+ _
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）