Rika

由最好排到最壞
5 s) a$ E' K9 j. f; C+ p  SF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong' L6 a+ i& Z1 A. P1 u) j1 M
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
1 f. J) g( ~* ?S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
+ }2 r8 x% e7 l+ y% Y$ QM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
+ S2 f& f. \, L# T8 ?5 O" U9 r* `L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
5 S' d5 |$ x$ ]. {- g' ^' h! J/ K* f1 B# m$ U6 k# a: E
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
9 h2 ]5 o+ W5 K0 B% K
/ `9 [: |' [; X, ^' Y, xS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
+ {9 S/ h0 w' ~5 Y4 Y" `     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!7 a, @3 R" F0 y

+ N% O7 z% e! [* GB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
; b- s& g9 ]! O$ U/ J  y
" M8 ~2 q1 C. C$ I+ j3 cL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
0 q) \; a) Y8 O9 Y( R8 @
) l* M& H" F  Y3 C- t( SF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
7 x6 o+ n7 g- w" N) c$ o     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
6 V. ]3 g0 S9 V' l& m, G9 o8 s+ y6 c
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案8 X. u4 d( ?: F7 P
而家答多次
6 z7 ~0 q6 e0 z) j; V: Gf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
, u; I4 [) U( i9 R5 |. d$ g' }l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架" H8 i$ L' W$ H5 s
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
* y; y. ]  B: i: s6 i% Qs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
7 H6 R; A( k, q* q2 J4 vm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
. s1 l6 f, l" r4 T! P+ ^, J# x& b) l: y' I4 P6 I4 t( @
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
2 o. U' K* ^, m  J6 GF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
( ~/ V; |' g) R! [5 A2 z  PM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒( ?' W2 X9 K4 T
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
" J- t# ]. d3 H* S. F* i" o; XB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞9 M; Y1 x5 `1 `  m5 C  e5 q/ a
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"' b1 J5 l: P4 K6 j6 s  j
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取5 h3 t1 k+ }7 e. f: ?4 x9 p
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
6 l* V/ n( [- C+ _" z! JL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
/ u1 B0 e6 V$ |7 FB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情. n; `2 ^: A( V: q& z1 }3 u

/ M# a0 P) W# r! n  G% ?世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:* c& Z  h8 C- [+ v* f# f
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己  C% ^7 R3 F0 U" h! S4 e( \" g! \
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘% _  H+ b* _' t. ?/ i' o; W6 l
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件) n- p, J3 w0 n5 S; f9 u' \$ O
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
) b$ W# f" j; b  W$ A, q" ^M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

$ A- X+ L$ r0 Z' d1 f

8 G7 J  x+ |3 f2 W same choices with u , but want to add some comments 0 _6 d) @; p  e: N6 A
3 s+ e2 [* X2 ^& ~+ I5 B4 F
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  ; A. c5 j( q6 q) R% a* _/ F
% ]' e9 n9 B0 @* T7 _- {% W8 {7 y% W
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
- D, s# w: H2 b& J5 m5 O& ?2 t6 W& s5 a, r7 D1 ^8 a4 b* z: {0 D9 b$ ?
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ) G- l6 T7 ?  f- m5 t+ `" S0 B8 s. W
. K$ z0 p% y. F0 w* C2 P+ h6 h: u
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......: s+ Z4 q, \7 H& V
( |( ^; e9 \- D' j
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
* L# G, X# ~7 L' C8 @M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
, ?5 D1 a, {$ WL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點; S" p/ x: r6 }3 S9 e
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma* Q( k. Q5 q5 [7 `6 F1 Q9 k

, r/ @4 b8 @6 n3 }' [最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
, X' r8 g' T: Z  V. }0 T' n有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
& e+ a" [9 V0 O由最好開始排起既話，2 o# ~7 t7 g" i' H7 y$ a  k. o# {
L B M F S 啦，
0 c6 e1 s4 Z8 ~% U) f
( _2 j9 `, Q3 q6 R6 x其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
8 Z% r& {- N$ {) Y8 t: u+ d" H但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
# c. n1 W5 H' o# Q! K% V: j如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
- f, q. L8 q6 y% S1 e" Z( G9 v又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
" o2 }/ r- e( n! p* |# T  {
! U, e. z) w0 K5 Q而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，' Q, ~) {  h+ P" T* _( x
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
+ a/ X+ L( F6 y: h' z* V7 Z9 C明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。& C" {5 y+ U) k0 v' m$ H

5 g2 T! I% Y7 j- K2 U. x) m- W而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
  W& @4 B# R9 z) n( {0 k M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
% |1 K2 ]. f' \$ b. `* H亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，2 n6 _0 @+ @" W7 g
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
' E5 d0 J$ L' X4 \; o0 d- g+ M2 Z: P M 都可算壞了。0 x; R: H6 [6 Q5 F% D
7 ]3 S. G; T2 F7 A, [& M1 w: K
F 呢個人仲掂，. `" C% @1 z( S) U* p
知道既唔等於要講，8 I0 b% I- t" T- K6 X3 R6 h
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
: [! Z; T  e6 F3 s$ x我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。; X3 q; n# V% @8 j+ q0 n1 V% e
; Y- p" }; w1 ?4 G) e
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，0 _) H7 e& ?! N- f& N. c% x
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。- U: \+ B3 \% Z6 I$ _

/ `% q1 B3 C0 j" B$ R; A: A! \% }
) z/ M$ s9 h7 L" [5 _  H) N
; f8 _; r6 F  Z1 \" K題外話：+ h$ d* n+ A5 K+ k
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
# M& k. I, p) e0 J# Q睇到 S 呢條友，4 h! z" w, s5 O3 l. `/ Y& ^% `$ u
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
# @! g1 i# X2 F5 `
* b9 q  ]/ U8 h' @0 T2 O: kS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!2 a* [/ V& ]: N  I. M) s/ {
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係% U, t$ y& K: B$ K6 i4 X6 K
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
# |/ d6 \4 S+ k7 o1 N) OB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害: n. ?) E2 n8 _3 Q5 Q) M
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...