Rika

由最好排到最壞
) n& j4 k1 p6 W  D  x! \& U0 D+ bF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
9 \6 {" H6 g* E- ~! H# |B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount8 _: {8 ^# ^4 J, z- l' R; l
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her, Q+ f: w  F* N9 u  I8 X4 ~+ A
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure5 o/ S, `) H5 v* Y, f
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:3 q; R9 M+ S; K4 k  t
( p  H" i! `/ F) Y7 k: {
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
# U- Y) H/ {0 |( U2 R7 c6 N  S
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
7 h) p$ s2 _+ {( t3 q     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!: Y$ t$ f  U  P
  L4 ~9 J% E+ |+ y/ N
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做. c; z, O+ u: k) d2 x

8 Z( I( i' J% v/ _) VL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志  f3 N  O& B2 ^/ R" D

8 L1 C* E. ~7 i& S0 TF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
2 i# F8 p+ C/ G6 X2 W& e     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
4 \' V$ e8 k+ L& [% g( E0 y8 z! Z$ q( e
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
  ^8 Q; |- {# h9 V* T+ ]7 H4 O# z而家答多次2 ]6 _5 Y1 ]& F6 ]8 _
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽: R) V. w3 ?1 [3 a' X3 y
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
9 G4 X" m0 V# I! G: n6 X9 S2 Qb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
6 G: H2 j: V- z0 K, _; h  hs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
+ C9 |0 [3 d# {! R4 Rm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S- U8 m, f- Y9 i: @
) Z! y& V2 h6 E4 w% A' d  i
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
; y, a/ W; {& [F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度$ m, p: J4 [9 Q0 r( f
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒' I2 c/ K' u" e2 T) k
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
; |! m% A8 r- \8 e1 UB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞! V$ N. Z- i3 X4 p- z- P
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"/ G" f6 @$ V) l( V8 l& ]+ F
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取! u3 w& Z0 K* \) T1 G" ^  ]1 k/ e
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法( F5 _* l# Z# Z$ L/ \5 n% p6 H
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
1 }) h' C* t6 T- pB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
6 V/ X  F& ~+ L, S. `3 r* j0 ?) r2 R: u
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
  C7 g" j. p7 U- u  A* L4 Q# `4 yL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己' e/ H" f& N# [9 Q
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
7 W- k; n* L* L3 {. d5 I- ^S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件& W4 g4 u3 i  t
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方  O' H2 \$ R9 k7 w# P! `
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

+ `% O3 T( `1 G: {9 N
' I; b$ j. w/ m* A, |% R( ]" a5 o, m same choices with u , but want to add some comments * _/ c7 Y4 V6 _- ~+ I" s/ N
' G3 O' [7 }( Z2 D
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  & E# t7 W- y2 g$ R. h
  w( R! l; V3 S) u; H1 ^" }' L
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
/ K* w; \3 D0 E' |6 y5 Z# y, _( K1 x2 y
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
; E$ O' v! e( H
" j/ w1 T- q5 D. L9 M. r: eM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......, h. p: V6 K/ s5 Z7 B" D
* T# D- N! k$ x$ e& u& F' q
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
+ K% X, _) b* z% kM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
  g! u' M$ C0 P' }8 A+ t/ |L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點: h) A# Z7 f' R2 u/ E; w; F8 q
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma+ C( }/ z* V+ k, X! I
, k! K: S& b6 m# I& X/ ]# S
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....; A2 ?& {. _4 f2 U8 \* ?2 V
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，/ h: T8 H* E# I% w) S3 U5 m
由最好開始排起既話，# t+ ~" S/ m& p2 p& ]" t% X
L B M F S 啦，3 `% E: Z8 t& s( n( a! a+ p& {
5 g/ |( z$ L4 [8 D. ]
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
( z; P; r9 _! c& t但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
8 }; J1 k& O5 O% D5 L  d, L' v如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？8 P" Z( M5 d. m3 M* h" s7 `, U
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。6 _" L# D: k0 a( H

8 H* J6 M* Q' x: I2 x) J6 i: ^而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，* y3 [, ]! ~  w- ?: @
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
( q6 e2 L4 j3 X) ?3 T: s明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。" y) k* p+ y; m( w, {* J

$ ?: b1 d3 s0 c6 J9 Q2 I, m3 w9 r& |而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，- ?" l7 }! p8 m" [, Y5 N+ Q
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
1 H- R/ A, J! E3 a亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，+ x  B9 r; x4 a2 J7 F6 v) E
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，) v+ p! p( ?! S- @$ n6 l4 _2 k7 p
M 都可算壞了。
/ [/ W: L* Z4 G0 \7 X9 P+ t. O3 j
F 呢個人仲掂，( n" Q' F. ^+ X: ~' G9 a3 @' P
知道既唔等於要講，( m: S" i7 P$ O
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
9 c7 F: {9 O6 H' D! c% d7 w' ]我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。) M8 j3 u( [4 C7 ~0 y

: d6 u9 I6 ~  c# a. S2 z7 F4 q% [最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
* d2 e1 Q, A; w' f1 ?; Y8 W始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。# v% Y/ t; m' r+ P% ?9 U

( q! b  Z& o! z; g2 A; |/ ]0 ?- Y) w! Y9 S
5 _% z" k# P4 `0 w  B
題外話：! g9 c, x' t) L: D
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
/ ^, K* M5 n+ e! K3 `6 p  B& G睇到 S 呢條友，
4 ^: ^; o8 a/ ^我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
) j' ]2 n' U- o" p3 j7 X; Z6 K. j, {2 Y+ M6 F
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
- h9 u$ w* V/ Z$ U- A- B; b- OF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
5 ~- l$ W' J& ^% A9 z9 yM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
4 t' g% K7 ~: zB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害# s! @9 h/ R/ ]% G0 E1 t% i
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...