Rika

由最好排到最壞2 J9 G1 P# t" A5 l
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
* m9 Y+ o, N9 Y4 g3 w# J. k( lB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
- f4 \9 n9 p/ o3 y5 F% x5 J, rS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
) ?- q. n$ l3 W7 j* sM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
7 C: b6 E# \2 T1 M& |8 D( N% }$ eL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:$ d" e* P' }; Z% N) Y% p% x2 k2 e4 K

6 l. k/ Y; e" ]M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
* ^. I" c6 J+ @1 k' [$ N- t7 N# D
+ s( X2 A! H8 I7 s  |, {* BS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
# D& B; v; Y/ y' N0 ~; S     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!$ H: d. D+ O2 S$ z
& u8 Q: J" c0 X
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
$ s6 K) ?# O# H0 s8 L/ Y$ T" {3 ?
  N' j% ~* f5 i- L3 KL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志" J( v6 z1 G8 h9 y" O8 j
. b5 {& z: N& _
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
1 U4 j1 B& ]# T$ _4 ^     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
7 B& M0 C  J0 M. Q+ F4 ?: n$ k6 m9 h6 L1 ]
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
! [! P3 ]0 Y- K  I而家答多次
2 d3 H( M3 L: y. J7 d4 n" jf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽$ O- A9 j4 ?4 X9 V, `4 C
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架2 x( ]0 F' P- s
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
9 _3 _# }  ^) @& f7 ss: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.3 s0 J" R$ P' `+ P: y4 ]( C) y
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
! _& n) |( m1 I7 J, l) O; `6 ?& {6 x  o, q) U; J9 i1 w$ _
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大. B( p' B/ i' _# Q/ M5 P
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度) c% T4 E& X# {1 z& X
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
: \- f. p7 N$ t( X3 jS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢: B' J: u/ T8 }- j5 N) n
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞" V* a- _, t* l( P
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
. g0 `2 B7 {% U' QS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取0 [0 k  q( c/ v  B3 B
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法* `7 B$ C5 n( _+ j& m4 c
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果* ?  `& |; s7 m2 C% ~% p; F: @  t
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情3 K8 W% E. ?  u$ O
" h5 h1 W  v- r( j$ c/ ~6 p
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:5 i7 [1 [6 N' G/ k1 V2 @
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
5 F2 e. ?; V5 V2 cB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘" g$ |% d7 G/ L. `: \
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
- ^) `7 i+ o2 x& w6 W$ `( ?) j7 JF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
4 d5 o0 ]2 W5 P4 F5 n2 c" E& F; xM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

0 h7 {+ A: a+ P* z7 N
, c5 z9 j) t! y4 A' I5 r9 I+ C& T+ ]. w same choices with u , but want to add some comments 8 ~) ^# O7 A$ ?

4 k- _9 q5 }% M7 J9 h/ `& zB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
) t0 v5 r9 G( O3 R  T/ i, ~8 Q% e. f' g7 A1 O" _& _) s: R8 v8 h
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
6 `4 G: m) s, D6 R4 t* M# n/ T
# X" l0 A, K7 U, b: d) U, q0 KF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
9 f& g9 J8 B: a" f, L2 \8 _$ c0 S
( L8 \- h5 L9 P) U: `8 EM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......$ p9 m$ R1 [: i7 H" {
* O: v" c' ^( w  W' ]0 s! D0 s- q
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
. i# j5 n* `; i0 [  lM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
' o+ e2 h$ l7 k* M0 VL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
7 Y6 d+ `  r7 gF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
: Q  e& C) g+ O& K
0 y1 C& |0 I) \4 x% l最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....5 M& z3 g' f1 h
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，7 @; r+ R6 D7 j2 g" ]' Y& H# r7 s
由最好開始排起既話，& I8 j- |7 C( c) m
L B M F S 啦，
& ?$ n$ B- g& t8 V9 F. _% Z' q$ B" d1 I  J4 R4 u7 _
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，! u- w! v0 T% a: s" w
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？# N: F& X8 C7 u9 D' y
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
3 I  k/ x/ @. |4 g$ J4 [  `又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
8 u. x$ _+ _4 e& @2 H6 E! q1 b6 g0 @+ K
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
5 ~$ \! o9 O: a; J9 ?- b所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
0 {" D( U4 {  B" m明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
1 ^# U( P: ^8 c- T2 X" G! _- T: o) r% M3 _& s2 R$ s
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，2 o3 ^+ S9 B, N" v. @# ~+ _: v2 L
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
5 l& A" Z: \; ~4 T( E0 \$ [( l, C亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
" [0 N  B% ]! t' X! m% l" i9 q  R知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
. ?. V- K3 e* I M 都可算壞了。  V8 d! ^! f- u
8 G5 F0 K4 p8 [( |6 d9 b$ P: D, P# i
F 呢個人仲掂，
* F. _1 O- y( j' q* @, T2 q2 q知道既唔等於要講，
- U1 l5 A; t3 `+ O  f) Z如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
$ ]" W0 |' p) ?% j7 ^: ^8 U8 N6 {我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。1 v3 ]0 P5 ]/ P% k9 g' P7 x0 p

- q: J$ @( k3 I7 e2 V最衰個個緊係 S 啦，' i* \' @: N( o0 f0 v% O  a. `& D
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
& ]/ @4 L" o; E1 i/ z( f/ S* e0 _& D3 I8 e. M  T% q& B6 ]
$ p) x- y" L1 v3 J5 `$ l  H: C) P

! N3 T4 [$ Y% f& Y% g  G( |題外話：% q, V0 v. ]! O1 H" H0 m
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，5 F; B$ B5 y) e+ O
睇到 S 呢條友，
$ i+ v- o: ?: S8 Z我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L5 `3 p/ n3 t' ]5 F
3 k* j% k3 v0 s5 E
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
4 z8 E$ J8 ]% G- G8 l# q6 q$ Z' W9 EF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
7 N# N6 ^2 w1 cM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她: M9 j  w' k9 [" \# |7 t# Q
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
% I: W3 o6 \/ t1 qL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...