Rika

由最好排到最壞3 Y8 r4 c3 l, r2 T3 ?  C1 o2 W1 S1 R
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong. P' u8 V# L, L. h- S3 t. I: t2 ~
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
4 `/ h4 d2 n- K: e2 @S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her( h! |* f$ Z6 C# p! B
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
7 l# t" Q9 B3 M$ m; ML, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
) Y. k3 L' W8 [0 w2 \
% Q* p2 r+ Q, g9 X. M# m$ {7 KM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人# C/ S, ?- _' s
0 s$ g( l7 X, m. W8 K' |7 T0 P
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
' {: \( F* b4 Q$ X- C. E2 @     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!0 U$ Q% A; H& }9 y4 @8 Q1 \

7 o0 F  ~7 ^3 ^( v% iB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
  v( |8 r: d! ^4 |! `8 \7 o. ~" `+ e
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志: s/ @/ ?  s( i
: E/ o! j5 v& E# ^; U* ^
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
3 c- W3 z' m6 q( \' a3 V     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
$ W  i( \) x' i! Z+ Y9 \
8 q9 g0 {& p$ J" `, D3 ~# G6 A: e[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案1 m8 i% B$ k( D$ `' _
而家答多次
5 J8 C, Q& f, g- A+ O. ff: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
$ X- q) r3 c' El: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架! n  N" k/ [& k3 h
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢4 ^; {& q7 K  \7 G  s2 w# X) n
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.# J0 b6 `7 G# T0 O
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
; P+ w5 p) E7 {8 ^2 l- O- @: ~& h) Z% m4 a# o! I& ~. W( d
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
) Y9 O. a  ]+ G* J9 S# M% IF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
; L3 d3 J2 L' [0 r" y- lM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒$ T# A3 s! V6 I2 C) l
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢5 ^; I: f2 D# i5 l" H5 @4 M9 C
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
0 E) e5 |9 O( u0 sF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"6 B% h4 G5 P" p
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
1 ^4 E1 Z. i7 A. @M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法; g* J9 {' ^7 B1 B+ ]
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果/ f, G" m. F" }7 g8 X$ `
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情$ f/ k, S) N+ x9 B! V

* s  P- q+ K7 f6 M% \" f% P( R) j世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:4 F% w) ?  T" W4 I9 c/ E. ~
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己" V. a  Y' b/ F1 J  M/ D2 }
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
, U* `! t9 Y; S3 B9 K3 qS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件* r1 w8 a7 U7 {
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方. V% H) i$ j' C0 o0 ?* K# P
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

3 s, Q5 \1 i9 ?+ z

+ z( B# x. P1 Y$ _! Z; y; }2 p same choices with u , but want to add some comments
- c0 Q6 C6 i; ]0 p% ^& O; O! H) S5 E, ^$ l" [" ^1 x4 p0 V$ X
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  7 I' E( K9 K: Q" c! e* l  s. ]9 `

: I: U) ~) |; f9 ^S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )8 |7 ]: d0 c5 M1 Z
( ^; C7 f" ?2 t, E: w
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome / P- l/ Y3 S6 e' w$ i' o2 ?5 ~
6 M# P, P8 l" {
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
2 [1 r1 @6 g- A( b3 @) H
6 @5 E  v6 b% j% [8 h[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
% t3 b- p; A1 T" O& ]8 SM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢) a3 J. P6 H- u( ^+ a* O
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點! r1 k  {2 D9 c
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma9 `/ R, r2 X. i  g" r7 N
; G# l' s; L3 F# r3 U( O
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....% q% _3 g- |* |3 J! ?
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
# D8 m; I, }( N/ K9 A& C0 X) x9 W; n由最好開始排起既話，
4 N: B% g) Y* y8 F+ P; ZL B M F S 啦，1 Z$ @0 v2 u+ L
! Z9 C% W9 ?4 ]5 \5 V% E% Z# @) V
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
* @0 q8 I: Y6 D& {8 W% S但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？5 z3 P7 \) E# j5 F/ m9 z0 v
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
' i! ~7 T3 J/ [0 y3 x% I又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。1 }% g: s' \" d8 M0 ]
# S1 _. H7 {+ _# P
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
5 x+ P* {5 l2 H, J: s所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
' J$ d$ j  b8 `3 H/ o8 N& B& t明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。" h! ~' w% N% [. c9 h

. @* Z( O( [, c而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
! b5 _1 A7 @, d# Y- e% e M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，8 ^0 Q; w. n4 \* d, K
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，# a9 r9 M% `7 {3 P* h
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，$ U! s0 x& m7 D7 o
M 都可算壞了。- d, n! _) e, w, D
6 a8 ]/ A; z* o2 x) ]
F 呢個人仲掂，
1 C% o+ H5 a% G知道既唔等於要講，* a/ j! y/ x' r/ q
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，, @0 u3 d9 q0 o+ _' ~# Z
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。% n& G5 c1 W. p9 X/ ~1 x

5 C% L  ]3 l3 b( N, o. ?最衰個個緊係 S 啦，2 K: ]2 p% k% g; i
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
. ~8 ]" m; k; e6 L6 L, z; P# j( ~; w" f, q" n

- r, {9 \, j- b
) [4 k5 ^  R) A- d題外話：
" Z1 o7 H1 h7 T7 s: m7 x- ]5 n唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，- q( R) O# z) V4 d
睇到 S 呢條友，/ \" m& A& W, c  b
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L. k  d6 `5 G. G0 H; F4 I% q. c5 j' U
& _( O8 I0 G7 L; [: x( K; P
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!9 W# l* ^& M) ^7 I  [
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
9 ~" ]" R0 m; h& DM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
; }0 W6 w2 T. {# W$ o9 |1 Z1 C  ]B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
# T4 D# W7 l4 D/ x8 o0 C# LL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...