Rika

由最好排到最壞
( ]4 b& M6 R9 FF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
. W  q9 X+ V. H  uB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
$ \* ^% t/ y! u; TS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
: H" J) ^" q& N; GM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
" w0 K6 E7 J$ s- nL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
2 ?' n' L+ M" C
* O# e1 D! P3 F) g# B0 NM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
5 [8 u' u, ]0 R& o2 E. R2 y. X
& N" G8 j( ]5 x* ]  F% w' ]( T' A; LS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
. v% t9 m' j- w     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!/ ^; B: l" b% n, H% }( }. N8 f

# }' g# y% W0 n( i0 |- [B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
$ w# ]/ _2 J) E" e6 f! \
( ~+ m4 P( s5 |$ m4 v2 \" {L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
3 N3 V( s! n8 z( M# M6 V2 K) F! C, ]+ ?3 s: K: s  n$ E; ^
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
2 y! s. @- C& E5 Q& o     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
) P! r$ r) W- w6 K- w1 m* U. y$ s+ q8 F! U
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案4 I' p7 t# F3 G4 [. D( P- h3 D
而家答多次
2 [7 y, m: Z7 l  A& J( L4 k( }8 Jf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽* k& N$ X, L. T0 ?
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架4 u3 _* L, \4 @( [- U2 h" V
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢7 w! J# P5 X0 g5 ~+ H+ s
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
: y8 T. W  {! W$ p* @m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S( {/ K: H0 b+ ~# P* X* j

# |( }* i/ Q8 Y3 [L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大8 n: ?8 ~0 k7 L" O# b1 ]& r+ @
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
6 V7 _, Y3 u. F0 P2 a2 mM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒1 \, V$ F1 \$ X  R/ C% o  t! ?  ]
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
, V6 b: f) q5 V# R4 T4 C" lB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞5 I. H, v1 k; a4 H5 B# [4 n* D& |! d+ P
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
  X  I/ Z& b$ }. \( l5 B/ OS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
, V' W6 ~- X/ N7 m: g+ _M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法8 i, b4 C8 ~% P# m
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果, G  d# ?* s% r$ h
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情! n0 E/ ~1 t7 i$ H" D
$ b+ l! {- J! J% A/ o% Q. _
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:' M" O' M, ?0 c
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
- _( O' U4 Q6 Y- E- ^B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘! x4 T) C% i5 S8 E+ g# Q+ p8 m
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件0 [6 ^/ E5 L/ W3 \& \
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
7 ^! b- P: q/ y# f$ y4 DM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

% V; k( }$ E# q/ Q& V

. r0 ?. G3 ~1 ~ same choices with u , but want to add some comments
8 s- W% n# n  B! }4 T4 J* g) Y) z2 {9 i9 R# Q  l( e
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  * |4 p: O5 d# h1 V- }& a

* Z6 p* R  j9 V8 m! p9 eS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ): m7 O* N2 W* F; Y  `3 e  k3 K/ m

& A' _. }: m/ @/ b. MF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ; w0 Y1 h3 I: [( n, H8 |4 h' H1 F6 ]
  F6 Z  k0 E  ^# o
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
6 R3 X4 w" u- n) N- q. s2 G1 t1 H" I: R) d
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
" n* ?; Y  a" Z% a1 Z8 _# mM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢3 B. ]( o" ?3 T# v4 ?" @3 j
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點1 }( X! \( h" r% v; k& w$ Q+ a
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
6 r* Q' O4 K! @4 Z# X' z* z: p1 L1 n7 H0 u# t' C# E4 Q! x* y
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....# x6 o$ j7 Z! G
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，2 L/ r- @. P, Q, G. I6 j  l3 Y
由最好開始排起既話，
8 w' I! w$ W2 }L B M F S 啦，
3 ~: \! S  _: h+ z4 a/ w! k: A& A; ^4 Y1 i3 ^7 R( B9 S( s
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
' ^2 h  }* ~( b3 H8 u1 r- g- X但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
/ I+ J5 X# u; e& v9 F4 z如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
8 B8 X  u- ]3 b) x* L; ]- X又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
: T) W9 [6 u! h7 J! o' @  x& c
0 x$ J6 o; P+ u  _4 Y而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，  }0 B) R- T2 O* t6 d9 u- m& a4 e
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
. [1 V) a& `+ I3 w, `1 ]明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
: W/ M* G& I' O$ Y
- l9 U' W$ \' }- n% C而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
, a5 w  X' z, j2 i2 L& G M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
0 k3 i8 H( i+ }4 Q$ h+ m0 O  ]亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，# C; V" [; S# e( t
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
+ F$ {- X8 r( W! z  p3 G- ~ M 都可算壞了。8 i' `) I9 `( ^

+ T5 h; l/ |  g; t9 n F 呢個人仲掂，
& O" _3 z# C9 Z: K5 L2 T" A% z知道既唔等於要講，
9 |/ U! o) C# E5 M如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
, v8 P% j' y4 ]/ R- M我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
0 L/ c2 x0 d) M, ]9 m* l, F1 o" o& Q( m
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
  `' z; r9 j9 q始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
9 A$ M% x! P, P3 o5 X
$ t! T$ }5 D+ c" x% [" c2 ]
/ K$ ]1 s, n8 h  ?! `0 c" c
8 K# ]3 i0 M- n1 R題外話：
3 X3 z3 y/ K' G! _唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
6 I9 d5 ^8 n5 o$ A; A5 S( C9 u睇到 S 呢條友，) D& x! {1 w2 C( t
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L( v  }: B' N7 K) j$ {( H

1 W4 {8 w% L# s6 \S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!. P: R7 B  ]: t! Q) T1 {
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係; z. w, }; S. U6 x
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
0 {, f3 C8 L' n' s4 }9 i7 `: d$ qB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
  f1 [; S, H* s7 C- }: n1 o7 `L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...