Rika

由最好排到最壞* n: t2 b3 `! ?( H' o
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
7 V/ r& t. U5 ^$ X; sB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount: z' |1 a0 a: Z1 _' C. k7 D
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her# m7 N6 s5 A/ u  O$ ^; M7 w
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure# F% o4 d. O9 v) g2 C) S& D$ Z
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:* S7 n/ s- e; n& p% h

5 m* U1 W) M) n7 o- V" L3 oM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
- m; W* J, [. `$ u9 f, U5 B# J8 f2 {3 ~
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
8 t5 s2 @$ `- W0 i: E     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!1 E* @& P. G1 W# v6 I8 \, r
1 w9 z3 H- _! _
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做+ c2 n7 d! D- u; F4 s3 c
, F4 J7 H, a2 z  p7 I/ Q1 G
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志! d, M  T' p/ N8 U3 l" w

% y, J* b# b4 K3 E9 OF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,& c* Z' X% E! b! ~9 B
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好& q% r' i3 d3 ?' G( ]! L

# D1 i* k, z6 F; F  ^[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
# C. j2 g. E& j& J: t' d% k而家答多次0 h9 x( q2 v$ `2 H
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
8 b7 j- u* |9 s% il: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架3 D+ e( a' M" Q
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
( K9 v* W4 l6 f; k2 g2 Q, ws: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.+ S2 U, H/ F0 J1 h8 g
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S* l" c5 W7 f! H! v. z
( ~/ \# h. T' |  ~
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
3 r1 b" u! i$ d2 E- `F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度3 c) ?* \4 l! z, j- ^% J4 e
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
) I, F2 K; n; w4 h/ Y3 d0 eS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢# y' K7 b0 O: L8 X2 K9 B. k0 z$ D0 m
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞- {: ]5 S- a4 K9 \
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
& R: G# a( ]6 a9 ]+ E" MS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
5 M- h" B5 L1 M  j, AM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
$ Z  ?& x, C5 \' |/ Z2 OL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
, o+ I0 Q4 ]) b7 h) [: l2 H2 JB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情6 j0 Y+ O  h5 S9 N5 C
1 g  {: G2 G5 @  P! M6 x; a/ O3 ~0 @
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:# f) n$ }% `3 R8 I$ d' I
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
- c6 W0 ]" D; {4 g% mB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘% z8 y3 \$ p4 N. t
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件; H  L) @4 F( J' Y. U6 C
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方- _  }0 h8 @; D! R0 {
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

& U. Q( m& F) Y' j! |6 O9 h
% R0 W8 v" D; f* r# F( v same choices with u , but want to add some comments 2 s: ~3 k0 x% ?" _9 G% G

9 P; r2 x3 p, @% D$ WB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  - K4 M6 R& l! q: r: k. {* D

9 z1 z. k0 z* XS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )& U: ]7 l5 M. H- b, L
2 Q3 E% R, o; G; V0 D( {$ H
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
( k6 O  B+ m4 x! I; P4 R7 O; Z0 X; P& P9 Y
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
$ W; C+ ^; C( z9 K5 `0 W+ {' I6 r
) W/ y2 r) j/ v  [[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge4 b9 @, i3 J! F+ z- v  J5 p% `
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
; n& m1 ^" Y! a8 gL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
9 Z- h' }7 w% |* ^. B3 ?8 `F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
4 U1 e. I1 q. P  H4 C$ L: w! ?8 `! H& _9 k5 X
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
0 t1 V6 f, u) D. ?5 @  l有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，- D/ y. I( X! Z9 O  `! o
由最好開始排起既話，' `* Q( i9 y* N9 R, c2 }3 ]2 e
L B M F S 啦，
& Q' G+ k; d& Z8 ?5 m/ V# c1 n" f5 O5 V# o- x) a
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
% J. A- M( j7 o. z! Q但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
3 j6 U! x5 }) F5 s% n如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？9 N9 {5 [1 R9 g5 t' T3 w: u/ F
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
; m8 k, i2 \# d" S* H5 K% Z) i( S2 m8 O6 m) W3 ?
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
7 F4 ~: S( {& k4 Y所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
4 T4 J4 v& X( \, h明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
) I* d) {5 o; B* |1 F# S* L) B& m  Q* r$ {" w' \0 F9 c
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，5 C% t) L4 B, p/ x' s- a1 I2 |
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，1 h3 M5 Y6 M4 C
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
9 b# v5 B* ~. B) R7 V知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，: y* ~2 Q7 f8 S! A0 {7 E
M 都可算壞了。
# B- a" d, I$ a/ O! j5 @; j
  j2 Q/ E+ v1 K& f F 呢個人仲掂，
0 |' q3 f2 x1 _( Z知道既唔等於要講，
# E: p: v& O. D/ u* y: D, ?1 A如果呢件事發生係自己身上，2 ?# q0 w) o8 a
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
4 B. N2 q- d6 N2 `: R1 ]* s
% G% K' T) f+ x5 w9 _0 L最衰個個緊係 S 啦，# p: J0 p7 N/ Q' V
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
# p1 {2 r$ V/ R5 J' k% X. y# y
6 k7 C, v5 O+ v1 S& ]) e
# c% ?* m$ `: a+ d9 |
+ c5 y" k/ q+ u1 g9 O0 g題外話：
) e, u! N, D6 {9 D唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
5 A: H" G1 U. L7 B/ O$ }, l睇到 S 呢條友，
; }% f. Z" w2 P7 K" s. M我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L9 ~- m" b" w1 C+ n
  i4 q* ]9 R3 [3 U8 z
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!* `- T: F. C2 `7 {" y0 C
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係  V" W6 a- m0 t% a
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她( ?' b- e! r; h" H
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
; s& _& ], G* D& lL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...