|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
9 f, e/ E% ^5 _( I( P- Q8 J% C! d+ Y2 T$ C) J" H8 n
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.( [% P2 Z) r6 G- z) X& S u: d
G- H8 ~1 q+ cIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before," x# v1 ^5 q- P4 \! p8 `" r9 y
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.9 I) p" \* C* O" j* ^6 W% `. s
. O3 m2 g& X, [5 T# n7 m$ F- [5 Gso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
8 C, ^% m0 B6 P& ~, y: E6 {3 }2 R$ C4 O; }
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
, H4 A8 O' i' B+ i5 G6 ?at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|