 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
8 c3 E0 \% d4 F z5 q* f0 ~7 U5 `, r) w+ s+ m- \
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
0 k: e& _; D1 J' t* _
$ b. ~# \$ ^7 tIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
) B* N; S$ q8 h' z- Z5 Iand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
% b7 w( Q( ~& ?6 ]3 L7 w
. K4 Y) S# B5 B: H5 Pso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
7 _" l; z& m; g/ Z! x
0 l& z$ p/ H7 ?& Tin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
& z" O5 T: q- a' w/ i! r" `3 Mat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|