 
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:& C7 f. l& [ v, F
& \& a( p, n2 C$ P3 m
# t, B7 P6 t2 U2 y同意.8 w: _& ~: `; W
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多... / u& d: y/ a7 Z
. i$ @ x/ h8 f" D* X7 q
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.* U* O3 h/ }6 j9 i
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
]5 _4 l- Z8 N/ K: S. Z$ [8 b( zI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.1 m9 m: L2 K3 k, l
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter., L1 Z) ]; R- b* k4 X$ A5 A5 k" s2 S" ?/ \
5 u4 }% @7 i+ ^' T C; o8 @- C1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law; C7 l4 \# z/ G E
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
7 J' V9 u* I$ n" }5 Y& E9 G3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
& `( z4 w1 }0 r/ |7 C3 c9 E8 s7 u
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|