奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
  L& G2 A3 e/ @; a- |
) ~7 d7 q' \: l+ f' D% magree,5 S. h+ u  g7 A+ |0 Q  X0 u
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,: _/ `6 s1 j" m/ s
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
2 z  u: Z5 R. `6 p6 _期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

( L' t2 G7 w6 k. o* Y3 n
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html( ~2 y0 H  M" ^$ N) @- \9 g; ]' G0 i
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地8 t  y9 W$ m5 c  o% g+ q7 E
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
5 f" S, A& K/ r8 l5 r- D- TJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:+ }! |0 _* I) s
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
; ]( ^$ n7 @: F5 A
4 i- [; ~# \, j9 ^係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???; s2 E: N5 [- [. n5 x( j, d5 K
9 m. Y' A/ e  i' C6 w+ Z' R
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

$ ^$ l  Z2 ]& m" c9 q: \: ]$ e1 ?- A8 w$ d
絕對支持啦
# @; R9 w7 B) A! C
" E5 L" M( Z  M4 d有錯就認,打就企定
9 t) b6 f6 J  b( m* ~5 C& U- R. O- s" G8 {8 @; h
無錯當然要撐到底
5 x) f9 g4 Y% v6 x6 k
. `# N: w* n- z% S6 m. _" d: f但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
& a- V/ B: e0 [$ {4 L& Y5 R3 ]0 x- Y6 n- \8 Q  V
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
% U5 G7 S: C: Q) B' b5 ^+ s0 s% `
; _& @0 k0 a# i: i一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
( F, I2 D. B' x1 D4 Z2 }5 f
+ [0 L* y! R: c- p7 B我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
# S; R5 C$ W; s9 c, p
' F' s; ]; c$ z唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
" ~! A0 Q9 J5 s. B8 F0 A8 v9 Q8 ^/ m" i# |7 k! u9 a
我唔認為lor* b" o: T; c1 R
$ ?  }) k/ o6 K: N
唔係話要整死佢地
. a! T1 w! k( Z1 F7 z" C  j$ V$ T  \0 P5 s# N# B% J
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
, d0 X. S- W3 t* D$ K+ }: b& l" v6 u0 Z$ p0 j- Q3 ~' v
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
  t8 U: O" P' R3 Q: Y2 N! Z. z$ E" g( |: D/ _3 ~+ E
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
3 J* _( Y6 p+ v" K, o- O8 D) L2 j5 \
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由& N5 U: n; R1 x; ^

/ k; B- p* U  J" S! W大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
9 {( u9 d4 ?& f) e! h7 e"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"# [! u0 Y2 {& X$ }7 b0 @3 d

0 j( o# o$ Z9 v. |( K我們的大學生1 Q# Y# o! J9 ~1 @5 |* k! `
# ]6 u+ e6 U! F& x, {" i
- P& @7 M$ A$ \3 S. _7 q- @
' e' h8 z2 _( ?. L2 y
6 u7 y( y; X+ ~/ w

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
) c) u8 n/ w* ^: z2 C" I
: l( H* _$ L+ o) X, N
  Y. }% S7 `/ f% O, {, x9 o7 d有見地 !!!
) y6 }( T7 l, @: e8 k現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
% _. z+ f& |. c2 r. w3 D. u" v0 u, h0 u9 v7 H7 y/ [
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
- }0 @1 Q9 ]+ ~I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
( _; [2 U, q+ YI pretty sad that about the University official.
- N2 w* |  Z) M: MIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
1 C8 e: a1 c, X4 K0 P7 N4 r# {
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:. y* q2 v* U/ W' L* U9 s& W8 [
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la" y. h4 y# I& u. m$ M2 I

9 s" X9 `2 L* u. n' m. X" n$ d$ y[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

' e/ I# S1 P: C& X/ \' [. x
! r6 w; Z' U9 ~# h2 ~
兩者有何分別?
9 o& L( D# D1 P7 |$ K中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?