奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:! p: D% |# Q  m: `
+ T, R7 E+ R  |9 c5 ]
agree,
) s" a( x. e! {) K; L我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,- o" Y  t0 ]+ k6 H, f" U% Y
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
+ q2 D& \* Q, m* {期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

3 _& @6 i0 u- N7 t! ahttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' y# K& N2 h* ~( T4 j# r" `1 ]5 U
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地! `5 Z2 ]' g) S! k9 {. |
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
- f2 I' N+ ]3 QJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:0 n, n# z( `# u- L, W8 f/ y0 s
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
/ [4 u+ _9 R% ^! T) m) E) X
3 B$ z" l- x& S7 q% {' g, U係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???( ?" X9 n& ?9 j
: Y" t: C; P) f+ X
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

0 ], G% u+ z( X% w) z/ Y: T8 w7 |, c# n* v2 u
絕對支持啦! o1 d" o" n9 y# m

" k( ^% [8 r) t0 G& d$ n; |' v有錯就認,打就企定
6 L+ I3 z6 W, M% j4 @9 O6 l! N5 W5 G& M: z" C! y
無錯當然要撐到底+ O& `: H& p! U3 u5 T

+ q) W0 ?, Q2 g' P/ ~' k5 Q/ u  }但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
' i" K1 w$ _6 P2 a9 p" w5 ]4 E- s$ [7 I% C3 g& U; I0 M
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
& y9 {2 V; J% H8 ^) b) I2 E) x0 |, o2 L5 V! l( ?1 L
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
. H" M1 u% }: g
( O. [2 H0 }1 {$ s我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
2 _, G) H6 |0 Q1 e! X  D2 h! F0 `+ X
4 ^% O; _) R, r! h唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?  ?  v+ I2 u$ R; w* I- u6 P( {

7 N( `1 O1 `8 M. g; l我唔認為lor
8 c+ v$ T5 _2 p
2 R# r4 r  ]0 n8 }唔係話要整死佢地+ ?& N: t, L, D' {
- \, y& ^, V. U( c' p. p6 O! ~: d
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用  b& y2 k7 h. z: T/ I
2 @, f; Z' M' n3 f/ _3 [" x3 F+ j2 P
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
. a: @( V- ^! A1 E- m5 Q" A! M1 i9 `' x
9 W' C- O1 ?. o# @  [" |有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的: ?$ w+ n( T( t* ?
2 T4 m7 v1 V- Y! T6 P
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
. z# w, K, x1 B+ X
- a) U/ ~( r" v% H  w大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句# t6 m+ _. M% h
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"2 q) g1 ]2 N# [/ I# c
/ e3 M; `( R" k
我們的大學生1 D' `; g$ w3 L- I$ j% M3 h$ Q

2 G2 \5 y2 d" l5 v' a( I" F( Y
% t2 `! A3 t! [0 Z
9 C1 |0 O0 b! g' i
$ [$ n% C8 w4 j4 F2 F

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:3 h; l- R" o2 c* U
2 Y" Z* q& t5 n4 @5 l  m/ {9 Y
3 }- M  K1 z8 D1 E' Y# g( `
有見地 !!!
( @& t: n; l& r現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
/ L4 n( o$ t3 ?% x) q. R
: H0 a6 j; r8 @4 \I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ) i9 G2 t- w# w" j+ U' S9 Z
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 5 j7 W" n4 ?5 Q8 L- @, y
I pretty sad that about the University official.
$ l/ i6 O( I, G& I2 n5 u+ \% XIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
9 U# h; E6 t- V
& I) l& \' B% D9 q[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:! V6 z" G9 ~9 N- R) E' s
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
1 p) U7 T3 H& s2 |# R8 D
( ^2 k' {/ o' ?  k. s; b7 s[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

) U+ N+ C# {' z2 r. \* n5 i$ x( ^) K/ s' @! X7 Z; w* m
兩者有何分別?
$ C4 h7 b: W( E  n7 X, n0 k. T中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?