奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:7 Q, e" J* R# u

& T% W/ m: g8 `  D$ J" l" l$ gagree,* f1 A" N% Z, {
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
" c$ a( H: @! k2 p但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
/ X; Y5 V' G& W7 V期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

; c, I. ]2 t( O1 C
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' u* M1 q6 r+ @3 a
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
, m0 P% }4 C" d, s- ?" ]搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.  Z; O0 B0 B1 y
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:* j7 ?" G% Q, u  O' v0 s5 B  }
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 1 O/ _" h% N( r0 N

" r) s( ]0 t( Q- t9 f' x係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
" d$ n$ }, J: ]( Y! m$ k- j* j  c7 l" }2 w$ Y7 W" C, X0 j
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

* h: x. P- j* w$ P5 [
% U5 |/ s( K9 D: @& |
絕對支持啦0 _3 E2 E9 A3 J4 L
& l4 q4 i" w+ K1 B
有錯就認,打就企定# w; V% W# R0 {7 S

1 p. V& D, a6 Z8 M2 h& F無錯當然要撐到底1 ?  P$ {/ [  q2 i
* k( r6 `4 A' i7 k- [8 d& @
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩6 U) c! X# R! t# M2 g2 U( v

# ]# H1 l9 R2 O% y* b0 f在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
2 Q1 j, k" e  J3 X* h8 }# u3 m/ ]" @0 n0 a7 X
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力3 B4 e5 B4 o8 M- V$ A* I% a

3 j) Q- V0 ]& E0 |, c我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生- q8 C9 k2 `$ r8 J7 Z
* y: U' L$ W( s/ z6 A
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
* [, |. y  V; a& f2 J4 r* d% Z: F
, ~% ^! o$ H" ^+ ]) ?我唔認為lor
, F4 h( Y5 b* Q4 ?& Q' M( \; I$ v/ P& c& |  t0 i/ }- }: y
唔係話要整死佢地5 t+ g+ {. g) F  p/ H

: }' X  d. G3 s, S3 z; N( a5 ]而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
8 }& ~# w; b# A7 V
6 Y/ C% Z# K8 ~- R/ J+ Y' z/ Q; S$ E我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大5 ?9 F6 B0 c" r. F) f
) d4 T8 X& W* G( f
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
  H1 c, N; t* k& ~
6 Y, o; g0 m& S! G# S6 E8 b) F唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由6 q# f8 l6 f0 K3 H& l
  M4 d; j/ P, L% }$ U
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
$ u/ m5 q% V7 R8 q0 F) w, y: l) K"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
0 g+ h, T. ~& Y" g8 j
. {$ H$ i$ P6 t8 k我們的大學生4 ^. p! ^) v2 a; P

' H; N* O; q. U0 |1 g, c2 H& Z& v5 y( S. ]" e5 l7 n$ a( C

! O( F3 ?3 p$ z: b" w# O( t# l) O5 ]: ]( z$ q. \% q2 s

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
0 {" H5 X8 R0 V. f
. W9 d7 J3 }! c& }: Y( w- ^
+ a! {2 Y9 O1 c( l8 B& O. I1 \有見地 !!!
( W; G. X, C5 l; F現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
! ^9 C2 @: N2 i2 [9 |2 q7 Z% n! c! u, F; a3 ^2 ?' m7 X7 _9 {
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
' t( t3 ^9 d0 D$ X+ o* V+ T# II never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
: k4 F0 E0 m) L0 C0 `- dI pretty sad that about the University official.' V8 G+ C" A1 M% g
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
, C# G$ k  H- s, c. r9 U* Q' c& ]+ |8 Q
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
/ m, f2 f0 u; T. T$ W. B6 H我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
: J8 G& f- R$ g. x2 p7 U  }# [  a% D3 J
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

$ F. n9 y  C* b2 n/ k
: g1 I/ ?7 {+ S" A兩者有何分別?8 j5 C: C1 k+ H& X% _5 h" b
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?