Rika

由最好排到最壞
- g# ]* ~" d6 e% @F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong( k( k, s" C, \5 v! x0 d/ k
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
0 i) t3 ^6 `; Q" o/ P' A) c( r6 vS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her; c) l  y8 K' W' |8 M! c: G& A, Z
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure5 \0 ^7 j% @) o5 M; Q
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
% J( C9 ?* [7 }2 O
, x1 H, y9 }+ @  S/ JM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人) E4 f, k( f) X6 o! v2 W2 k
4 {0 l% I4 P1 ]; x" m7 @
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
# ?$ ]- I: k# D7 ?. O" f$ q     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!0 w, p- X6 a9 q) T) b( d
& o7 d* a: P: K5 f9 L
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做6 C, z& J+ p! U3 c
& ^3 M4 T. ]  Z7 ?2 m
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志( m$ u! |; n+ A" E$ c8 _  T

+ p2 ^8 D! b+ b, LF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
: g7 T2 k6 H* u; H; E/ `2 D4 s1 j     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
3 B: _( y8 b3 W  T0 R5 e: `7 G' u/ g, `3 t
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案' y* D# [* C- u& @6 K
而家答多次
9 p" x, A) {& j! B. [+ X* T* v# [f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
9 J: n* G: Q3 }" D" X. ~l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
$ s& N& S. x6 }* k. f: t; ?: Ub: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢4 b% V* Z8 g/ J( o) I
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
0 y. c$ R; I0 [, [- w# z" D& t# f8 Dm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
/ }' Q9 \5 h/ d( c$ i; @7 }3 ^( t; D8 }* ]* y+ w7 p
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
  ?* {# \3 [2 Z6 Q/ {, g, B6 l! q2 TF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
$ C/ F9 R4 K! A0 p. T  \# CM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒! F# T( Q2 A1 g+ u/ v9 c
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
& V& ?2 l1 T$ E- n5 r- a; [$ D6 BB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
$ P, ~( ~. R: mF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"2 u0 _- }* Y0 u+ o  _% k2 ^$ r& Z
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
0 j: P: \) U: i; Z. vM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
9 O3 P8 K# ~% e% O' Q; z' nL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果" t5 {- W2 \) a- t4 J
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
3 v& L! ^( K8 q2 q
% v0 ?! `- k8 T  Q' C  X& B世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:8 b  S3 h! v4 r0 U
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
" Q5 A. x9 F, ~4 d1 v& r9 @1 [. [& jB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘4 A7 v0 @" n6 K+ `8 Y1 ~2 f
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件) \4 K; T* U" v9 V+ q& _0 g! `( t2 }
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方+ G: L; X; U+ h  Q6 K6 ]: q( \  g0 b
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 o3 i; i& I9 C. l
- H8 W7 _7 E; g( b same choices with u , but want to add some comments
* Q$ W  Q/ I$ l$ `. M$ u6 Z4 n
: F! b. c. Z7 u+ _B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  4 D. |  Z, e" y5 ^

5 S3 d5 u, s" s0 N1 F) l8 ]S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
2 _8 K0 ]% R, a, B0 |! j/ H4 E3 R  T% z5 O; N7 k
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
3 ~" F( ?8 Y. f/ ~' c) t4 i; N
& A5 z- X/ H, p; }& I5 tM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
' ], \& O! A3 A% V: z
9 {" C3 ]( {) r+ |% w[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge/ T0 r8 x! F! D7 b/ N6 v; O
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
4 u: S* r; E+ B, w  `* zL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點$ [2 ~$ x8 y+ ?$ m
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
7 ]* A/ k' q& a+ |2 x8 c3 E" e
8 G5 z: _2 |1 j. ?2 m' _最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
! H7 r0 g( u$ f2 ]* r有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，3 u9 E$ h$ i' ?3 }9 a
由最好開始排起既話，3 z1 Y+ R! ]" ~) _1 F, Y  {8 j
L B M F S 啦，% w. A9 V; S6 \# E
0 l& a% |1 T9 S" S- y2 u
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，# n0 z4 w3 C9 p5 s9 |# ?  K6 n
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
% e7 x- I5 t1 Y/ ^# I% J+ T+ D如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
! U" r  s7 K; u$ ~1 p. f又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。: V) w. F# K( g6 C. a
: c! F0 K4 G: L. g
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
! b% m/ H0 V8 B/ r% x所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
, r, o- R4 p' I明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
0 e" M0 Y' }0 W, v$ P' b0 I! Y, E1 W0 U
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
! E2 o! _  ]* Z" `% n M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
- b  a: P9 ^  U# X亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
% N- j% x  p+ D$ C, ~: t6 x! k知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
6 h- F% i, U# _6 _ M 都可算壞了。
, Y- ~" N5 f8 m
  t0 v$ s; n& S3 b. B4 K( h5 [ F 呢個人仲掂，
& @, _; E! o: v. D$ g, O知道既唔等於要講，
  b$ O8 o0 N% A. b如果呢件事發生係自己身上，( g/ V5 N1 X$ T! P
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。; J# b9 b2 q9 U5 u7 Q. i( n

3 E$ c9 F/ |" u5 Z+ c/ @最衰個個緊係 S 啦，- ^2 m, y/ y( E+ N
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
7 n2 B, L; b$ g- U2 p5 P
/ ^* z) C8 k8 c0 |/ ]3 |% s( U. `8 V

$ v8 Y3 Z6 q, z題外話：
8 {5 P5 N# }" A9 v; d0 N; Q, L唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，2 ?( R# K  F- q3 \
睇到 S 呢條友，
' P/ Y+ U& D" ~6 P& l我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
& G1 j* _5 p7 Z0 D4 R
; i* z0 p* W7 m' |! jS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
* s- c/ Z  \% m. E8 JF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係( t' T: \: S+ m
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
- W5 w, V- C. W4 f0 ^B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害6 l$ J! M( a& ?5 H; d- q# X. T* r" A
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...