Rika

由最好排到最壞
, V1 T) l: z$ ~& HF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
, z5 c2 C: l5 X( t8 o* y  e& AB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
* T6 I) j% P) s1 p1 ~, a. _& v, ^S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
" i- T* X2 s: I: j9 F# l4 m) V1 cM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
5 l/ u8 u! ?8 G& O3 j; ^L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:4 W  G" [$ g$ G
- k" V9 f4 E  Y# P
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人% w' |" l- _7 @7 k: D" g

2 ]& y, j; \+ VS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
+ b' {' D3 r& B% H& \* ~# A2 |     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
) k4 S9 z3 b; }( f
9 w# |- B  b  r9 o$ U7 lB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
* j  h7 Z. W) T- O  @6 M
7 R% ~& _1 V6 r( wL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志# C$ F# _, q' T0 ]! A9 a% b' z; i
, v% K  l1 M3 C+ q6 Z
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,! f8 G9 O% ?9 X/ Q
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好1 g+ B3 o4 t9 l# M
' L) c' J, a$ w& e, s
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
4 I+ ^2 Z: @/ r而家答多次! a$ V; {8 l, J/ u# f
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽0 E" }8 E) ^2 x0 F/ `# l
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架1 R% F) Z9 E0 n4 F6 C
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
& q' u$ h* w$ P# P! `s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.) o  X* p9 Y1 y' g
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
; c" p( p+ p) n  t: c! u. l
2 a. Q% K; s: R5 I% k+ [L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大+ x$ f: J1 Q1 M& H9 ]
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
0 T3 I1 i! J1 n' a2 GM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
, m1 r' O7 b' A2 y; c! I8 X( D- `S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢4 ^; ]0 C) @2 _; B& L) _, |
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
' a- X7 {' g5 Q! y# h& r" K- b( FF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"# N# l0 i. s5 E! \# |8 o
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取3 c2 [- t; Q* w
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法$ E1 R2 z& Z9 L
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果0 K. ?( O9 @; l/ ]* r- o
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情/ p) s8 U; {& d& G

# O! Z# ]' W- R0 D1 R( p世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:, b5 t# `6 t) Y6 W& |0 D) N. w
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
" d3 ?2 z) J6 X) d" W' u9 ZB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
4 E. a5 D0 z! @  FS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
! i7 N& f" |8 R$ V* m. ^$ L5 qF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
) n1 [1 \/ F  k2 `$ X) L0 U2 }1 WM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 j" b; q3 Z5 M6 {+ k
; m/ q7 \4 [+ Y; w+ O
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
8 L" s# [3 }3 \& {5 J0 c8 [* w6 U1 K! d+ C' K( v: h# A
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
$ n/ X  c, _  [0 U  M: o3 L8 Y- k" {3 T7 p4 l" u* |, D8 g) |  ]
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )2 @! V3 X/ N4 x$ F3 P0 q8 r  O

& ]1 L8 m: B) ~6 jF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
7 ?/ {: I9 e" K/ X/ t
+ X" x4 T8 e% e% o3 g2 t% a2 bM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......5 Y  m5 q; Q. Q/ ]! G$ K

, l$ \7 u, l: x7 x1 T[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
7 I0 ]$ E' ?2 _$ _8 h5 ]8 m- _M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢* I  R3 P- n* v& b" |9 D
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
4 d% O/ B1 b( ^F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma& A( e9 V3 \  V7 Q- p! C

& P4 k- O# C9 `. I最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....9 y: D5 A6 c) P! }9 O# ~7 z* b4 t
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，7 j. K  q4 M2 L# h2 }
由最好開始排起既話，
0 A0 B% Q6 P2 i$ I* T; B+ @L B M F S 啦，
0 X, `& `6 N' r3 w5 E4 d
, K2 L% W* I! Q0 C6 x, l4 o其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
+ Z! y4 \2 e$ @1 `" R2 d- U但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？: c8 A1 k$ A' y
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？' }: t% S1 {7 ^) S- v7 `
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。7 v; o, H" a# m3 k9 z- y0 ^
% {  f. H8 {8 R! I( S/ x
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
/ a3 _$ s2 U4 [8 t& c( U所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
0 p' B& v- N% ~& E# `9 Z: _2 z4 r明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。' `! t3 h" X3 Z7 F, Q6 ^% c
9 v& R7 x4 ]' A8 b2 q# m
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，+ x# ^+ B$ b$ L/ g( G
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，0 X% b2 i; `  ?1 j- N
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
7 T9 U' C8 }; o9 }知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
) z# J4 y0 |6 f: x5 ? M 都可算壞了。
1 K1 @/ s* f& l  V
# k5 w( }: T$ E9 ]' l. q F 呢個人仲掂，: v- K- d* I5 ~/ Q
知道既唔等於要講，
0 W& u( J8 b. u如果呢件事發生係自己身上，8 _; s& [2 y6 S; A
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
  g; y3 T: z- n, o( J; j
, o  _. v* x3 m( V+ A最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
) T' _4 X3 ^& \始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。0 ?9 S! w  G+ M
3 `9 O; c& N/ j& z7 ?5 i2 e

8 H% ]" r" l) o- ^" P9 }  j. J- z' E, j8 S
題外話：" H9 {' X+ F& u8 S" D
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
- J8 D0 X6 F+ v! v3 f& _. K睇到 S 呢條友，
" ]0 b6 Q. q$ |我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
  ^7 a% ^  T- r* p& q  u  R4 u
  l" ^, G( S6 D4 l1 F# JS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
: H# v9 {) Y: }$ gF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係+ Z* p2 W  s* n8 o
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
; B- U5 C5 D% A  ^; K3 }0 SB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害+ T4 g9 C* `9 z6 @& f
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...