Rika

由最好排到最壞& w  U9 k9 P6 E7 q5 j2 V
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong! |+ s7 C" s$ h# J1 r
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount( L3 O) ]) N. E* ^! `
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
  K0 C3 O2 m9 h# [$ S2 j  C. eM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure! r& Z9 G6 ]- H1 p- Z6 A1 A: Q! {
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:9 [2 Q5 \) V/ p+ Q- |
* O& E5 x- n, x" ~, F, i# U/ A
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人. ]4 ]! v6 {$ X

, e0 W- v5 {+ O( ES - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)9 c* O/ M; o" K9 q; J% v
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
8 Q# F& o% D. r1 F5 K  E9 l9 E1 o
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
' U" W) J8 k. T" t1 P
# z) o% u  [) w5 `! E( p( GL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志" T! j$ f, T* }. y( ^
8 m- T- I2 v/ z3 o0 b9 n+ t, P
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
  S- d) g7 k  e$ [     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
$ m( [! R$ G; I9 N$ C6 S& e  }, H& T! Y2 n; H$ C
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
% ~4 t8 h* V1 b( `" K, i0 V而家答多次
6 d; W, d4 e# s  x0 Xf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽  R+ s; {! n6 p
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
" ~. {" G% y! {) z& |# j" P  xb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢, w+ m% T# L' O* H; C
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
$ e) Z+ h1 I4 x2 ~2 \& Hm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S1 i0 v9 i, ^2 j3 B; s5 ^" Z! K& s2 P, n1 u
9 M% a! Z: D9 r  c# v1 K
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
, g$ [4 x7 I+ qF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度" E; x; k+ C7 i% U. Z+ u- ~
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
( v7 q6 l1 n: YS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢0 g! Y3 F/ @: c
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞3 F& s" T5 O5 I1 Z2 H5 }$ [
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
# i- i' v6 J3 sS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取. ^0 j' @8 I" p2 K& B, x  `
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
2 m& D& t' O. u5 X+ YL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果8 U0 H; [5 I7 c- s
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
& H% T" ?9 {; f# R
+ X- E5 z0 `( K! W/ X世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:+ f" o4 E5 E- h& H0 Z+ I
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
% G# K7 a7 N& f: }% |% _) jB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
" F3 y" o! @) V" ^, oS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
9 v+ t, {4 c# }, c8 YF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方! `7 P% P& N8 ^8 o* m
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ f$ e  l! |' p& h( |  @0 @+ v& H! a3 ]
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
3 D: U7 O- x3 K8 k) }4 i8 @2 T3 N% a1 M/ o& q$ k1 Q+ n
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
7 {4 K& R9 G$ s& t/ H" T- e* O6 }2 I! J) [" ^
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
; ?  V* \3 m$ Q; h) \3 X8 C
' ?4 l( H5 N+ d) [6 C# }" w3 kF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
! A0 f" M  A: o$ n. _
: z/ |8 S2 k% ~9 c3 PM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
; j1 _* M5 J0 h  o# |
  g8 \7 @3 [2 P5 ?  a9 K- b[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
- \+ `0 X- {4 p5 kM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
, p" Y' E- H: U7 [, M8 K" eL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
6 K  J4 n+ Y4 YF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma7 g0 f0 p' N4 j: V. K
( n' @8 T! C  x$ C+ R
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
+ d- D$ O7 v3 i6 H1 A4 s有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，# W  _* Q; ~& R+ \  C2 f* w' D
由最好開始排起既話，: Z- r" A3 Y7 U4 L
L B M F S 啦，
' |, A: z7 Q8 Q# T  B; `! B/ M. S# T' Z
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
% A$ s" c7 S; l- b4 F但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？% s5 P7 ~2 o- v' o- V* B
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？% _& o% |$ c% A1 j4 L4 S+ s
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。; D+ \2 h* c5 n% N3 B& S" N0 M; ^

: l1 Q3 n+ ]' d) U! i7 l8 Z而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，$ T2 D) r* S1 P0 u
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
) B4 n/ K8 x, a' X- p# d明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
; ~" C8 S- v1 {' w! Z2 e2 Q" ?% ?* K# Z+ f) F& V4 `
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，  N+ D- ?# ?& \* |
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
$ T' o# Y7 o3 W$ S6 F9 r* c亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
# [9 c- O2 m" ^; U& B! ]知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
9 P1 y) ]' c4 U6 u- N) n  L# I M 都可算壞了。8 V* \6 m+ K4 X' R

- \* s7 i' V. G: z; u* X F 呢個人仲掂，+ R% Q6 v8 u8 I
知道既唔等於要講，' a4 o+ w& E7 i; W: L; Z
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
+ y) g% g$ C& b; {# O5 f; w我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
7 w5 i" m6 W# B6 O6 t! a2 h" `5 e+ x8 H% a1 {; t- E0 ?
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
7 j8 j: N$ }" Q0 P! n始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。! B) _0 z% K( b
  @+ w) c. ?" e7 p# j% U
( i( I2 M: Z: ]0 \; D2 `# x$ a
; P3 `" @3 U' n0 A/ o4 Q2 r
題外話：
3 C: ]% a" M! ^1 }, Y0 k: F3 I唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，# W, G. E  y* h
睇到 S 呢條友，
/ n% b. B% I% z' ?/ }# q我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L: y3 s; c% P- ~" ^4 [# ^
: {1 v: c1 W, k
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!1 l. i- e+ Y2 ], O5 `
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
0 }- [  \9 R: u7 q! jM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
2 V8 Q) Z3 T% S* f6 z3 ~B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害+ Z) c# I7 W! M, M
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...