Rika

由最好排到最壞
4 n$ s6 F0 L0 l* d' E" [0 lF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
6 j' g: h+ Y* `9 [/ u( g' mB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
, ~1 O- M5 v# g( pS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her: A& h' v$ P- a: g
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure  e) T' o. W) G& M' f- n
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
8 p; z/ l  H! y1 l. N
( B* Q1 q) {. T- VM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人& j- A7 f) [& n" U

9 c! q0 H/ D0 Y% w& t2 kS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)$ w' {# [" J& i* x" Z
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
5 M# d7 I6 b& z/ y
1 y4 \$ E) Z) o% E% LB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做8 @; n8 q2 C7 @0 j$ s" S
+ G2 s. O1 p2 P9 j% F
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
) W& E8 P* m9 ]) }# d) |" k' u) j2 z* ~- l" c5 \1 Z
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,& u* z; j. v; K
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好- Q* z% E9 q8 X# X6 x3 u

3 v; U7 o8 q' a; `& ][ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
4 H9 F  c* Z2 O0 Z# x# f4 E而家答多次
3 X4 x4 h* w) W. M3 x, nf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽/ k! Z. L5 B; t% O0 J, q( ^
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架4 H, L5 ~& w3 y! L$ k0 I; i7 F
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢) P5 ^  g$ A" [$ o' ^
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.- @% a/ q/ p2 N' k" b+ ?: k
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
$ Y4 N! |$ l: |  v4 ]/ d9 {! A5 Q2 w& I& D
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大$ ~9 b7 \  }; C8 [8 |# o. K+ e
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
- W& t2 j: Z2 s% w1 y; cM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
; D; [, B9 t0 ^8 A; c; d3 sS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢2 ?- L$ S2 W% B% L( r, u
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
6 \2 l: Q! L( \7 tF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"0 H/ b, B  q6 o) ~2 {$ S% K
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取. ?7 |  ~4 h3 g7 U+ v- `
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法6 J7 r* U4 h+ h% t  B& O9 Z1 c
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
! y; U, N: W# d4 ~  OB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
# e  K0 l1 ~6 j4 u
# R% Y' K6 p: x3 N; j' P世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:  L( l2 v  C5 n- R' ^3 U% v
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己- h, Z+ b) z; R
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘. i* R$ V/ a: X3 E
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件3 @2 A/ k$ G4 h/ V' P
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
! O. t) z4 ~( f, zM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

6 L: H9 s0 C' F5 L% a; h/ c  {/ G( |
same choices with u , but want to add some comments , u! f- \/ t. Q9 e& ^9 g
9 I- H3 l/ M# G) Q# {$ Q
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
$ Y3 X8 u* P% j- ~7 e2 g" s! a
3 b8 v2 Y8 _2 |3 PS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
0 ~2 Z( c) ^0 @/ T8 a& P) j. f* j& m% {6 a  U" _/ y( e
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
: E" ]) P" z+ c0 |) w/ \3 \! |
8 B+ z0 a3 ^  ]( X. q% @2 aM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......& m/ r) h9 e" E3 J8 F

' G* E: Z) z! b) I) N[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
! P* K8 R" {, i6 B, L3 T6 C6 Q6 EM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
$ j% [6 N" @$ @. f/ tL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點" Y' k3 m# d& d
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma: b0 d3 Z5 o; f0 T0 G7 u9 h
) B% }, ]* K" s% K% ^
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....  R, U: |9 F/ _7 O9 A# [: @
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
; R7 A/ O& |& P+ L8 _1 g由最好開始排起既話，
* d6 D, v* ^1 [L B M F S 啦，
1 w- P4 r5 M( L3 U0 n1 k/ @% G; T( f/ Q3 N2 O6 |3 f  J
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，& l# t+ S* Q8 v+ q" U/ C
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
3 |; |7 c3 S2 K! i" Q* A1 F如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？/ [& O4 ~3 {0 R
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
- s" U1 b5 A/ o/ i- Z& e
5 Z$ P4 J( R6 m; B而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
9 D( K: Q: p% N+ ~3 v所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
$ I* h- P2 }' |: Y5 B9 S明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。- R/ w' [( m, M% `) ~' F
& w3 P8 [. Z) i( N& ^- b; R+ L
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
- z# z2 @% I6 X) i5 @; D8 @ M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
  d9 b0 z# ]$ G' {( q亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* N: ^+ j: j) C  ~
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
9 {% o- M7 q& O: {# n$ U+ D% ^4 _9 q M 都可算壞了。1 u0 R( Z. {" h" q
% Y) V) r0 t4 }5 a' r3 g5 ^
F 呢個人仲掂，4 O+ R* s" c; `- r2 S+ w. Y
知道既唔等於要講，
5 Y1 V  f; G5 U1 n& L如果呢件事發生係自己身上，: W; H7 Y# \: N' P/ w" g6 i% d
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
  v2 `4 Q" H" L: `2 Q0 w4 \! V$ ?
3 r$ U+ a6 c7 z' V% y( Y- @最衰個個緊係 S 啦，: S) K/ E0 S6 j6 ~/ J/ E$ N4 ^6 \
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。0 d! g6 f6 O8 v& o
0 q6 B. _* y7 q. ]2 W1 ]

# D$ }. s, m( [
6 N5 m$ Z: X1 H) G  E0 G* j題外話：
4 S5 S" h( A' G9 m+ u# C, m5 w唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
. b( |0 p  O) P# S, O/ q5 c! W睇到 S 呢條友，& @/ a; u5 b" g8 V# {/ q  P
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L; E; Y7 U7 }  A# y6 N7 T

: d: u1 E8 M' `/ A, yS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
% _8 [4 m7 c1 m6 ?F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係  \( c1 u/ E% \8 C
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她6 Z" V9 |1 H8 r. S. {9 r
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
8 l' _# x" W& E2 T# |) `L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...