Rika

由最好排到最壞
* }! N+ Q* {3 a" T5 F% A  K; YF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
0 m- O9 \, r( r! i3 U( Y! D) }6 l$ L5 KB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount; G: h/ Z0 A6 A% t8 P5 L! t
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
) f5 _- {6 _0 U* ]M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
4 z4 C  y* I! C9 v* {7 g# J% HL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
0 g5 o9 u) v/ W; s& `1 O
3 f0 }" @) w& ?9 LM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人8 V+ M" |2 w7 g  s. J% F
% s) i# V, G% Q5 Q. n
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
: [1 R1 J  P8 ?! n5 H# e: N     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
& E7 _& U" q/ ?8 z& H! F; x1 n" X) g5 t
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做+ V0 ~4 w9 \; l5 W4 P

# e/ x* Y3 l! D" H3 W+ \L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志* W* r! c7 S* f% @) }# {' n5 Z' X
0 H' i3 L2 ~3 @0 v6 `: J
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,5 _# x% F4 B: j8 D  L
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
% H7 M8 k4 G9 `+ C% x7 A# F0 A, K1 j+ W- {9 {& o* [8 T, H" ?( U
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
" q5 C7 \  z' u. `& |而家答多次% Q3 ?6 m. z! ?: \& f# P
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽/ F+ E: f: M4 p3 L; f/ D
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架% K8 e; A4 m3 h. |
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢. B* V8 [' B9 t' |$ g+ Y, M
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
+ j, n* \% `+ Y/ O$ f2 ?  R' Ym: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S- n; j% @. ^% R, J. a6 Y4 p
' F) D  Y2 z% r
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大+ y4 R) a" r2 X: [2 t4 s
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度6 @: N8 |* R) f
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒% ^2 N' x7 U* [- ?; R( ~9 Z
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢- z* H4 A: D5 N5 ]
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞- F; H. e7 k) `6 F
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
; O+ v' G+ R6 g& Z  i0 J8 A+ AS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取9 s. Q" F; D. h- h4 h/ G* n
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
- R7 v" b  P( d4 eL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果! t' X3 `# r, s! u5 q. }3 Q
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情2 G' n  @1 ^' T% k4 D; Q
! m) @; b% {: S; K
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:" w+ q2 ~: v( o* w7 J) Y
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己+ Y/ O' G' J5 u
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
! O+ Y# a. d6 g4 }2 lS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
8 A. L* q, |# @; n7 nF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
7 z% w8 E  J' P  j& C0 vM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

! O! s9 l3 q! f( d6 u( r: B! c" }
8 z6 ]9 L% ]" w" L8 I+ t
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
' z3 u5 F# ?& _0 w& O7 W
5 v( L9 q  y0 g: W7 K  a. z, A4 w3 nB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  * n: `' {  m$ C/ D
5 o8 S9 Q& m5 \, B. A
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )3 [4 S+ @( L! F+ Y1 S4 B
, C% i  Y% E4 B! X# G
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ' X, p% O4 T# O
; \" z' w/ a; H3 A
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
# A: D- F, [6 T/ S# S6 O& R2 E
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
) H9 C# H4 s: W$ ?9 C: ]4 V; X8 X% IM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
: ~, j+ e% J0 d7 |! s8 Y! eL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點0 H+ T4 e: m( X# L$ y# R$ }. G0 p, U& \
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma) R) Q* O. O$ _; t4 _, ]; M2 F
0 E+ T+ i/ @: ^! l
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....! V6 l+ ~) e- e4 o8 G
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
. j" `6 E1 y; c6 J4 M  Q由最好開始排起既話，
+ F$ S! z5 N/ c# R$ E, H7 h- TL B M F S 啦，5 t- O3 P. L& c  _6 \

- q6 h/ C6 a" O, T+ _& s其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
4 Y0 K) u+ U7 S8 ~3 n8 Q2 M% Y) Z但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？- f* `' @% U  ]
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？6 ?! s5 {) u' g+ {) X# X
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。% l- u0 M& ~& |- }  z

  m7 |$ F+ E9 Z而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，5 T4 M2 L, t) @3 S2 r0 s' y
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，% i" O- o8 X/ n
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。9 a" w$ z8 ]: N5 ?  ]
! W# Q1 \/ p8 K. l# b# P  K
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
6 R+ u1 y& X5 J4 ~ M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
! _5 l  k8 G  o/ q2 D亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
8 S$ c  A0 R. `( V( G: U( G9 U8 q知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
5 s% s  g: X  k6 v: `% h. g M 都可算壞了。( \6 n4 [  ]) W0 C, x) n+ n, s# X" a

4 @2 _0 C% j0 F  |1 I  ?: D1 R0 { F 呢個人仲掂，
/ }3 j/ h) Y% j: n* ?9 d5 n+ s知道既唔等於要講，
6 l4 n2 e+ Q7 [6 e; U如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
# Q1 W7 Y( {( o, l/ }, |. {我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
3 v7 J4 r  T7 m& Q9 B! @  Z# W9 c6 C5 a7 \3 X& ?8 i+ h
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
3 B+ N5 D8 D" T9 e1 P始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
1 v4 o3 }6 C# T0 w% {, H# K8 |7 _+ e: N& Y6 M9 a
. B. @' A; V0 }" S4 ^

' G+ a; I& k% }( Z題外話：
& M8 K. M& S" A* s( t+ U唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，4 Y" i/ ~- `( |. Q- p7 i
睇到 S 呢條友，
$ O! d+ O) Y) w0 G. r# c9 y我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L8 |1 y5 T7 W3 Q/ z5 P
# I7 j1 _! }' Y/ \5 f
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
* p* `1 [. [' }3 ^% s, VF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
5 V) Q7 B! ~- C: x4 W5 w" w9 VM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
# q5 ^( C7 }0 zB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害$ g- Y. r6 Z1 Q, o& U% Z" U
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...