Rika

由最好排到最壞1 S* d& ]# c# y# Q) ^4 Y( T8 L6 x
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong1 p9 v) ], R# e% I2 Q
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount0 ?) e5 q0 ^8 I. v5 [
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
. A: t! `3 y5 k/ M$ dM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
7 p! t4 V* c, T+ z6 VL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:4 y& L% K  J8 T2 V/ m- C# s9 V- ~. k3 ^
" P- j" i4 k& q# Y" I
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
: |. b$ n' P, n/ G8 W
/ i: d8 x% G" Q( T6 i# E7 s6 r7 M$ ^$ MS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)+ a* S# X2 Y% {3 R. G: _+ ?" y# T
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!, G' l& Z9 j: Q1 B. D5 \1 S, ?
# l- k# u4 J5 I
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做# L+ z$ H8 N# E' q; m

  z! R( O8 g0 [8 ~3 ?# t$ cL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
& z4 z" H4 j. T9 ?2 X2 U0 Q' T$ a0 q
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,- a) u/ |6 ^! @0 e! Y- ]
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
  `3 Y8 [$ o8 p0 V
! [8 D' ^! x! X8 |[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
; K1 c, f. A: ?, L8 H+ \' `而家答多次5 F9 W! h8 H) m1 u: h) m8 L  o
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽! a& P$ O8 I% n/ R
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架5 z9 c6 Z6 h% k. S3 \
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢1 w; ]: E  m; ?( |
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.& o# u' m. |% f
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
9 L8 h: p3 A2 J9 g$ X' o8 r- b  e9 N, A9 Z- z4 W; {" e: A9 Y9 {
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
. T  N0 Z* p0 SF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
2 @3 B- G8 n  }+ R$ D4 d" h: ]4 jM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒8 z: Y3 S6 L# P% ^6 o/ J
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
- ~- w7 B3 J( r- q6 m5 VB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
  Y$ A4 ?4 @' @; F% @6 h% bF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
: f4 a0 l8 M, B2 QS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取# W+ ?( Z- n" H5 p
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法7 F0 [0 @* b( R' S1 P7 }. @& i
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
8 Y# ?+ Q2 T7 mB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
5 B0 q- e# R5 M
) J3 {" J# x2 r+ F世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
* ~4 Z# I/ E6 S5 x0 FL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
" `% S( [7 }+ s0 p) l9 C, p, gB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘" T4 d2 r1 d) N7 q
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
; W2 `9 K( r! f2 Y( zF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
" z  h5 T: D8 I- [9 P1 d( eM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, h* l" C2 ]$ \+ B* g& I; V
  O! v8 x; Z8 k/ o same choices with u , but want to add some comments 5 T* J+ l# ~4 f

; P% {( K& \7 X: {! f$ y, qB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  / }1 u4 N. b7 S5 f( L

) n& }. l) d' ]* w5 ^  O/ _S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )  {2 M, K6 C/ [0 Y8 g

4 Q! d/ J* e, {6 |9 v3 m  fF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome " g, c% ^. w# o4 X0 p

- q3 ]9 p8 N$ GM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......0 O$ z7 G. c. c8 n

( N4 _' B* r2 q3 s0 @) y; I[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
/ N4 k, h( ?  X$ e8 K+ ^M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 {; D& d+ O! v! a! [/ L# uL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點7 C% [7 a2 C6 {! `/ N* \
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
- ^( O: c1 I+ A1 A! M! Y$ ?5 ~. o1 i, ^
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....2 P# [6 P4 s* X  T, y. b& I
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，$ @$ y) k7 R9 H9 w
由最好開始排起既話，
, q7 S5 F1 a( H& z' e0 ~3 ~$ bL B M F S 啦，
1 T3 j1 Z" V7 G# y' W2 q8 j
. A1 D2 z+ r& D' k" H其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
. `9 s/ t; b: ]. E' a8 ^但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
1 J5 H# s, {) L5 h如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
' _6 M8 E; N0 Z9 U% W6 Y0 q又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。, i$ b' {, q7 P5 w

+ W# V, Z5 y2 K% a1 I而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
5 U' c  W8 S* T. F所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，& N% D, k4 I: ^3 i! z
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
* t2 T: h* H7 _& q9 O: h
1 n8 _( Y1 y8 h; ~而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，" @. B0 H  g+ E$ a- G8 ~7 I
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，2 Q7 C) l. k: ^8 p1 O
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
5 ]; ^0 e# |+ T1 |; O5 }知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，: W" U8 s# ]; P' E6 Q7 t) Y
M 都可算壞了。
4 p. }2 u4 [8 o  A! x4 u0 w! y
! U% H+ ?8 z# s5 p2 @7 Y1 N! S2 ` F 呢個人仲掂，
8 y# X& N/ s; \3 i知道既唔等於要講，
4 @/ f+ I' R9 @4 ?0 i) n# M  ~5 ~如果呢件事發生係自己身上，& t7 D% U: \9 B! c; U5 ^  K
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
1 M& K- Y. ]) R6 m! |3 P
' s6 b- k9 L- L9 L% O最衰個個緊係 S 啦，( r! u2 k2 S7 f, Z0 o
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
7 b5 r: o- Q/ R4 O* V, G6 E. S7 \/ `& G  a$ v8 c

- X8 I3 C3 ~/ n( {, n5 L& v2 Z% p
5 `" C# }7 A( v, V6 ~' ^8 w6 v題外話：, c' y2 m) n8 B0 g
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
9 O! o; l- m# E  m% p睇到 S 呢條友，
) J1 ?+ D7 R# B' N( v  x/ h我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L0 t: ?7 Z# z4 P+ }
+ ^: i# _" _. ~
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!) t$ ?% D$ w( H( ~
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係( S  ?9 N# F* H2 p4 M& f
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
/ U, C# o. |2 ]% i6 G$ h0 {3 gB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害% [( @' Y( }, E; D$ F# ~
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...