Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
& n. p- r3 C: X/ q2 ]9 ~0 t3 G
( }  T/ W1 W  g" P+ c/ w/ R! B, u( ?/ H) y2 X
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 B4 z0 S: m% O# i) D" g* c  a* p, s  N3 ?
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
1 ?( E2 |6 t0 E; p5 q- }& K& N) ^. E- w2 z! g% B" s
6 u6 {+ v0 y* Y" E% W& ^
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

7 m$ d9 }: S/ H- d; P
) i" t  h! D# x
oh really...+ z' F# Q' }7 o% t+ ^: C
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
  n2 l, O) [# F/ _  ~3 v- O) {; @( `i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題$ c' g, I0 K% w( t" I( j, q. V0 f
- M. b3 h& y% @4 @3 I& v, c
當然這是個假設性問題
4 \/ Q9 Y0 J1 Z8 c, [( n但將人數倍大
5 q5 b3 y3 o& u' e: D/ K- I例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
' f) s1 l$ n; y9 l+ B* {0 C, K(情況可以換作其他)
- b6 T, O% K3 h8 z" ~/ I& l# C$ x  V始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
+ P+ S+ Z9 |- y如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
4 I: C4 K4 ?# o$ }5 s如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:& q: D' b5 ?8 \6 K
絕情谷既問題..." ?$ H4 l5 m! k% d
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...0 }# m0 }6 T$ V5 k- E
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

+ B. e9 a) ?6 E
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好7 \& Q( M/ h- O6 I5 B0 l
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生- U4 W; Y: v- B, r. w* k( d( n/ L
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩0 {5 T& t1 k0 Q( J
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢: V$ X: }9 b  M: ]
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢* N8 s( g+ D2 r* h
: f  }# b0 n. Z5 ~9 z8 M$ ]
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
' L' B9 e% |; ?& y不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:% Z1 N5 a1 }1 Q
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

  l# }+ C; @; j" s; Q1 S
- t4 F1 e0 R# e; ], Z+ Ahaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣) t9 {' Z  b4 F. K4 Q
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
$ x. U2 m. |2 j5 p! \1 E% B$ y0 k. Y- {/ w0 R" z
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child. L) r6 a5 g% c: x
yes, my reason is helping more
6 C( ?( z$ l/ S% ]* t5 a. a5 E  bfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
7 [" q) w# L8 W  d( }if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child8 L5 Z( ~3 R$ M' t
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?. q3 B+ L& `) u: ?+ [4 Y
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
$ e# u6 Z, _6 a( wmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
2 h: Y$ @% k7 T5 }  t- Zunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~8 {% R# [! z. ?3 N7 c
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
# O$ L5 i/ e3 C4 T, y$ L2 d我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~* m4 ?( S# c1 z2 F9 F( r
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~/ C" C" X$ p0 _5 O1 ^$ t; ]
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~. i9 s/ i' z: f* [9 a5 s
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
) Y, R1 Z- r' X  b) u但如果o係當時o既情況中~~4 n( @! b0 N; c4 \' E6 V: d& V
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）