Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:; A6 f; N# a9 A% a

0 }( F& s8 T* K& @  V
7 t  L/ Y. q# @, K# e. r我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

) _1 j  g! Z0 ^3 A+ a7 u( u. |  |5 D% [4 D+ ?1 u
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:- {4 _; R$ _) b

& D0 `% J) _( S
' [. _/ d. |3 Q( h; |5 w8 l' k. jIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

8 R& i$ W5 r) K( b) B4 }2 F
! J* n' W% s! T& a6 ^0 w* W8 f, V
oh really...
! ^$ k) C5 J& Q7 D$ r7 E8 Lhahhaa, thx a lot^^"- G$ @, F1 T( s
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
) Z; ^& u& S4 L; C! z( H
4 O( Q! O5 S6 G6 U當然這是個假設性問題
, X( z: n$ w" C! [/ M" N0 S6 t( N但將人數倍大
6 a$ ~9 p& M7 T8 n# ~! L1 }3 N例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個( T; i5 w  L& b3 k
(情況可以換作其他)3 z" _$ s% l9 ?' D% |$ F; n
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...9 b8 O; s1 }* s
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...) c* P$ A1 H( s
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:- k+ p7 y1 J5 _7 z/ K
絕情谷既問題...5 k1 }3 O. ]* p7 N2 \! q) s  I1 B  T
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 E0 ^& f1 _( _9 a% J2 t# z6 _* q如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

. J( _) I5 L* M' H殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
" S  g4 {& b' B3 S% P於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
$ o. S8 B' m+ B, T3 X& e2 {, G但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
; ?( L% }3 J: X好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
3 v: r2 I; q. s& m1 [1 y# ?其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢8 M$ h1 s4 U* P( @, b
, E+ o6 Q( R6 m! x
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
# l8 K* A# J' b& n/ `' m不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:; v- W- ]2 Q1 s8 B& _  x. V7 ^$ W& B
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

4 {% {" c' s2 `4 m( ]
) L2 T0 u9 k. c( Z$ ]haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣' t- Z4 u6 L: L4 o" S" V: z* t
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
" a$ F, F$ H9 q( w4 G! g, v0 ]- J: B; E! d1 ]( ]$ ~
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
& }/ e) c. ~% Cyes, my reason is helping more
- F6 {% z. x4 Z8 c; P4 n% yfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
7 n. D$ J7 `+ e4 Eif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
( V6 v7 J- S/ ?5 @& Cbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
8 \. D& H- X' _0 n' aalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!9 j$ Z, ]& ]5 Q
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!$ n: q' j/ t  |  W6 @& k
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~" E  b* [+ l7 C+ h7 V, C
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~6 H3 \1 e- G0 [& O1 A' ^0 c# U
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~: X. B4 k  v6 Y4 Z# r# Y/ W' o) U
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~; v3 v+ z- E+ i
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~4 s! S. H0 x. X  ?* q- i9 l
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~* Q: ~* H( Q, J: o1 @0 C1 Z
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
- v  O) t3 R2 w# X& x我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）