Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:2 k/ K* o% o/ K! }* A) J5 w' k4 M  U1 g

1 G4 E2 p7 M* E+ ?7 Z7 J$ Q/ q0 q
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 ~! U$ n( H- e4 h: A( _

- R% v: c, ~. C+ _5 y' SIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:9 |# L) F# G8 t& k/ u- f' H5 j

: H8 f) m8 V0 [
4 K6 `, \4 K3 T' u, h, {In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

$ k; g; Q# G8 w9 v2 t' m% ^& [+ J' R- W
oh really...
6 e: N( [. Y5 z- k$ k* mhahhaa, thx a lot^^"- `$ Q" o0 |# K% [: H+ G
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
; n5 H% m; l) N2 i1 I4 s) k3 r8 l/ l0 W$ _
當然這是個假設性問題% K! N5 ?' _/ j
但將人數倍大
4 n. l0 |- x5 P* b2 L6 {例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個/ `! L" l; ]' p7 g
(情況可以換作其他)/ c7 W4 Z( p9 e7 U
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...9 L1 L) U  M3 q; g
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
' T5 E* H5 H' v  G如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:! o! k) r% ?0 f" m% z# J+ p9 t
絕情谷既問題...
2 m, \. q* A% h! u* X0 i如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
5 b7 r  K2 n. @" \5 L如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

7 w" p7 o1 t. m1 K' N. @殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好" ~; |; S- a3 V; Z! U" Q+ G2 s4 t% o# Y
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
( F& K$ a  A0 @但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
) {. u2 o) c9 ~5 ^  Q0 ?) j) x好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢. O: h2 q$ h, d9 O
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
9 E/ H, u& O5 h8 v0 Y) ~3 r7 W! y% Z
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命, x+ Q! ?0 t, e
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:4 H  y: r8 ^4 u- u0 z
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

. E$ K& h% u2 \5 @2 I) y% j$ A3 N7 K7 m0 o6 |
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣5 L' x9 R6 E2 X
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
- w+ K6 ?  @) {; A" |% M: R2 Z% r$ W' D! }* Y  N
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child0 d" Y& n/ A- t* Q" Z/ _/ Y/ |
yes, my reason is helping more* s4 u3 \1 ^- l9 _8 E& B
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!+ ^! D9 S7 G/ I" @# ]
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child% G% s" j/ J, `2 E
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
) ^# S/ x0 z) J; jalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
( _6 h+ C& A+ S9 a) W- cmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
$ }8 u' n0 [0 d  Y6 {2 a1 C/ Ounder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
" f" Z( C: q) e" ?# R. v當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
% B) S9 G3 r% F我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~6 W- X, n: H1 Q
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~& w. D6 F1 Z! t
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~2 A& X# a2 y( l* p* i
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~- ]# ^9 \3 y' ~0 d' U" J0 e; ]( L- A/ J
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~- `2 f3 x6 @4 ?4 \: x- r4 y  I
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）