Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:3 f: u; Y5 P, Z6 a' |

8 j$ j0 U4 w1 h3 G% D
0 {$ i* ]4 h' ^, Z% l2 f我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

+ h$ X% s. W( I7 p, {

1 y/ e/ K* O3 M. ^9 t4 kIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
' b, T$ d; D2 a- s4 G
; M4 `5 q3 r  t! j4 V9 e8 X1 h" t1 e- J7 ~. [/ j
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

- m7 C$ Z+ q4 a! B" U  B6 L
" m1 e( P0 f5 L( G! H$ o' h
oh really...
$ D  n2 p) g7 o7 Z1 A0 j; L8 Whahhaa, thx a lot^^"4 l, x) X7 X- i+ ]
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
3 P: [1 K' e' N' k( u9 J: V& `5 z3 e2 |- ]
當然這是個假設性問題
0 r2 o) a: ^1 v5 [但將人數倍大& W, ?4 |* `0 [5 j* x
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個8 ~: [/ }: j: G1 p$ d
(情況可以換作其他)
! B7 B2 `1 C  t始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...! t: H" s2 w/ b9 _& s
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...$ i. Y  r, D" }. h; i
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
# E4 B9 M8 |9 r9 ^8 I' \絕情谷既問題...8 w& G$ i. E7 `! w$ `, l* i
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...$ W. w; @" v" Y3 D& o/ a# q
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

3 `. p. q- W* W
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
4 X" n) ?+ D4 w  w4 m, {: L於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
( D" [. a2 T. w) ~3 v# i* S0 n, }% j但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩) S# w; b# h) l, p8 Y( H$ C- c7 c
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢% V/ a; G) y" r' R. S$ @6 P
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
  g( }( v# [3 O
% Q, s  @: r! J# g' M) ~. z# N0 n我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
! {& {# Y1 b' x. K不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
. C9 w8 ]( q$ G) x( e4 W' z! P其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

) ~# Z+ F. u; _# j
2 e5 E+ u: K9 F3 u7 E
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
: A8 Q6 w1 E4 x7 o$ Y你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了..../ b- r4 C* n" a% i
0 C3 A: c, b2 c; Z/ S
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
3 B( k, U  o* K- w  O  @( ryes, my reason is helping more+ i7 e, G& S' U
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!7 P8 u) ~# c0 C3 i. U
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
( d! C1 O% A: f) `* E2 W1 pbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?- T. V4 O" D+ {0 W
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
7 B1 V, M' N% X) [' M) u7 D$ ?may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
/ `+ B/ g9 C7 t/ o* ~$ t" runder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~* H' @% h+ ~7 Z
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~9 f3 `2 X5 e6 B! {
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~; P; m5 K, S. y# C4 L& k; g
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
/ z3 n/ f  P# ~, w' M3 o即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~, S: S7 ^$ L6 D% l$ p' @
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
4 g" u2 }9 k5 z/ _/ O但如果o係當時o既情況中~~7 \  C+ ~' f7 P+ k6 O( [+ K
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）