<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)) I0 r, I1 D8 O( R0 G( P$ \: ?
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
9 e- |) h2 m- S/ Z2 |8 o大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
; d( p  O) g4 J2 {- M- m4 g8 c$ \
I agree you points that it could be illegal
: ?) M- }6 p5 F: P9 Jbut that is still a "gray area"* z) J9 }/ e( l" N" t6 ~2 Y
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
, R- q% W6 T% d. ~' w, b2 ]8 n( [
3 P- M: t+ _+ ]: S- r3 V# B2 _% Xanyway, I want to say that is
  A. t" s  X6 Y& Q8 n6 b# s  kwho is supposed to be protected by laws
  N) g. u3 e/ Lcreators?8 ?3 b/ E. ^+ M! i5 K
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market+ y) z: g# e0 W! e" |. {
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.- u* _& ~& Y7 @# G9 B9 m5 ]" X8 R  W
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those0 i- @* }+ K1 X8 F. z0 |7 z
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:- j- c5 t9 u' v/ c! ]$ `
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
: k6 l: j" h2 ^' x  g3 _我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
% Y( T+ S; O+ `, f, |/ S  B. ]6 l& ]+ J+ Q+ v
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
7 Q6 l9 W" X) n2 D. T! e8 D: F# t+ L5 l
唔係喎!4 g6 Q5 y' c+ x0 r
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
5 v! w+ I" a+ x" F' v- S7 Y0 m我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
& s2 b) {6 s' k4 i& Y6 \佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
* j3 w# u$ O* u5 V. M就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事3 F+ G2 L" p* p0 C8 O  \0 R
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
! v0 z. @% H  Jdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......! y4 Z! t0 }3 o0 Z) r
if so bad, dun download la, right?
& y. O- x7 p8 ~6 g& W( F7 v  g3 S2 mi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^' g$ R& q3 S5 r9 d* ]; J7 ^
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct: }; e1 j7 j: P8 ~7 c
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
$ i. q9 I& J# `5 \: t* T* R1 oso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society3 S8 x2 r" g( x% g$ `
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
% v: Q5 c+ T! k+ F- Iwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!% T& l7 ]3 u' j& ]
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
# m8 q7 H% ~, H' D佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
7 Y' `. m, J" Y' l政府想比下馬威0的人~~% N, ~; i9 K. h9 p; e" H6 b" }# k
錢就一定罰, h0 S! u% l9 E" z
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,2 d' n& Q+ n/ f: @; N
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
% c- r: w" p: p( F( Z" P佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
3 z3 ?( I% e! s3 }& Q到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。