woooot

yup, that would be something new learnt , in addition to the spectacular performance by the Dutch team

bunce2806

Great game. Although I'm a fan of Capello, it's nice to see that his way (based on the traditional Italian defensive style although he has added his own innovations) isn't the only way you can win at the highest level

brightlee

This is the answer from my referee coach for this incident:

"UEFA confirmed that the player's (Christian Panucci)momentum carried him off the field and therefore remains part of the game. He could've returned to the field immediately and involved himself in active play, without penalty, for exactly the same reasons.

If he was injured in all of this then his status wouldn't have changed until the next phase of play.

He certainly could be treated off the field, while all this is going, but couldn't re-enter until given permission by the referee.

With regards to the injured player theory, if he was still on the field and not seriously injured, then play wouldn't be stopped so the same logic would be applied with him being off the FOP."

amigofans

Originally posted by brightlee at 2008-6-11 09:18 PM:
This is the answer from my referee ...

無錯各方面已經解釋得好清楚, 呢球唔係offside...

但當晚果位球證傍證真係咁心水清?
各方各界攪左兩日既答案, 佢地心水清到電光火石間可以明察秋毫?

成件事根本就係, 好彩彭路基on居居攤左係底線,
救左d裁判一命, 因為佢地根本係睇唔到雲佬offside...

呢d咁既波, 一年吹錯一百幾十次啦..
只不過累到意大利輸波, 當然成為焦點啦...

brightlee

I can tell you, the referee/linesman from that level, they know they make a great call for this situation.
No doubt about it.
Fingers cross

zxc3201163

Originally posted by filter-052fans at 2008-6-11 09:35 PM:


無錯各方面已經解釋得好清楚, 呢...

咁果日阿仙!ge賓特拿果球又點???
我唔係好明依條例

brightlee

Originally posted by zxc3201163 at 2008-6-11 23:50:


咁果日阿仙!ge賓特拿果球又點???
我唔係好明依條例

There was offside....
that situation is more clear...
For that case
you can goto Fifa.com.... goto Laws of the Game...
hand on.. I find the direct link to you....

http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/lawsofthegame.html

Click the box of: Interactive Guide to Offside Law 11>>

There should have "video" to help you in this case.

I read that last night

Kian76

Originally posted by filter-052fans at 2008-6-11 09:35 PM:


無錯各方面已經解釋得好清楚, 呢...

其實最慘既係可能落起踢波既呢二十二名球員都根本唔識呢條例，而且一直踢開既波都係照吹越位，而家無神神話有呢條例都幾無奈.........

呢條係例，但點解咁多年以來一直都冇乜用過？？但發生錯判越位的情況以及傳出傳言出左界外唔計越位這些情況就經常發生=.=

amigofans

Originally posted by Kian76 at 2008-6-11 10:50 PM:


其實最慘既係可能落起踢波既呢二...

不過輸3蛋最大既問題唔係球offside, 係意大利自己...

好彩我唔係fans, 而且一早明白意大利高峰過後一定如此...
試問攞完世界杯歐國杯會打得好又有幾多隊?

加埋意大利歐國杯不嬲麻麻, 鄧納東尼, 死亡之組, 青黃未接等等..
根本無一秒睇好過意大利...

即本睇下聽晚, 佢地同法國邊隊88先...

Kian76

Originally posted by filter-052fans at 2008-6-12 11:14 AM:


不過輸3蛋最大既問題唔係球offsid...

真係sad到爆，我當晚睇到啞左.........


我又要犯眾憎喇，我睇倒既係派路金玉其外，敗粹其中，表面上係球隊攻勢泉源，但就係因為佢在陣，3：0呢個結果先會出現，詳細唔講太多喇。

三人中場線，有乜可能用派路？？？真係想講粗口。