Lee3

原帖由 infjlam 於 2008-9-30 06:34 AM 發表
除左個個都對個市失晒信心外，
華府動用納稅人金錢（公帑），大細超去救果班高薪厚祿o既財金高層，小市民其實極唔甘心

對極對極！我一開始就是這樣說！
這個道理很簡單，譬如你把自己的房子燒掉，我會不會買一閒新的房子給你，再給你一些炸彈，然後在希望如果有機會，時間/財力允許下，你慢慢還錢給我，不還也ok。

會不會？當然不會。

Lee3

原帖由 Triangel 於 2008-9-30 12:55 PM 發表
A sian Markets fall on U.S. bailout failure

updated 1 hour, 14 minutes ago

美國再怎麽說也是指標國，他pk, 全世界不用好過。還好沒有動用那七千億，不然更會火上加油，不止跌那麽多。本來如果看dow有稍微止瀉，七千億就會通過，不過dow在完成議案前已經開始狂瀉，所以不通過，因爲根本按不住。那七千億如果丟下去，好比一顆石頭丟進黑洞裏。

[ 本帖最後由 Lee3 於 2008-9-30 02:08 PM 編輯 ]

Lee3

原帖由 AWU 於 2008-9-30 02:27 PM 發表
7千億咁少, 梗唔批啦

根據ron paul, 市場上已經有多過7千億credit, 再加7千億是無補于事

Lee3

原帖由 d228216 於 2008-9-30 03:54 PM 發表
又奇蹟日
最新             | 升跌         | 最高
17,919.03  |  ↑38.35   | 17,975.08

能夠守住17000已經是奇跡

Lee3

原帖由 ＬＵ 於 2008-9-30 09:49 PM 發表
我老豆同我講話..........美國國會唔通過議案, 係因為美國啲人好多都爭銀行好多卡數, e+ 宜得間銀行早啲摺埋, 咁佢哋就可以唔使還卡數 有無人咁狗架 ...

不是卡數而是房屋貸款，沒有錢還就要被銀行售樓。但是銀行不是說突然閒會不做，他們只是被別的銀行收購，譬如washinton mutual, 破產，聯邦政府收購，轉手給jp morgan chase, 美國政府一定要保障國民的銀行戶口，所以是轉售而不是直接close down.

Lee3

共 和 黨 議 員 Paul Ryan 就 說 得 坦 白 ： 「 選 民 有 很 強 烈 意 見 ， 我 也 擔 心 會 失 業 。 」

很多人不明白他在説什麽，美國議會的蟬聯率是99%，基本上如果你沒有死掉，你就可以當選。

Lee3

原帖由 Triangel 於 2008-10-1 06:06 AM 發表


What kind of butt shit it is.   I mean the situation, not yours

corrupt policy and votes, Congress incumbency rate is always at the 98-99%

Lee3

原帖由 Triangel 於 2008-10-2 09:48 AM 發表
The Senate has approved a modified $700 billion financial rescue plan just two days after a vote failed in the House.

the new bill and the old bill are the same, sure there's a little more coverage, like from 100,000 to 250,000 and a little more tax cuts to the normal people, but the money still comes from the treasury, the money still goes to the banks and "investors" who got the rest of us in this mess in the first place. The only change is that the House has reelections coming along soon, and the Senate doesn't, they can do whatever they want.

Lee3

原帖由 feuosma 於 2008-10-3 12:46 AM 發表


Lee3大....你意思係就算今次過到參議院...但係跟住一樣都會過唔到眾議院???

I wish. If the House rejects it, it will be for the best, but I thought the House votes first, then goes to the Senate.
quote: http://english.hotnews.ro/stiri- ... -final-decision.htm

It contains two provisions favored by House Republicans: One raises thelimit on federal bank-deposit insurance; the other reiterates theauthority of securities regulators to suspend asset-valuing rules thatcorporate executives blame for fueling the crisis"

Tax provisions in the new version of the plan are expected to win thenecessary votes in the House of Representatives, several politiciansdeclared for the US media and the international press agencies.



In laymen terms, the amount they insure is higher, but most people don't have that much in the bank. The other gives power to the government, power the federal reserve already has.

Basically it's pork. A 700 billion dollar pork barrel.

Lee3

原帖由 Triangel 於 2008-10-3 04:50 AM 發表
Dow falls 348 as investors worry that the House won't approve the $700B plan.
"There's still concern about whether or not the House will pass the bill and even if they do, whether it will be effective ...

and there is NOTHING on returning the money. Hence the biggest problem. Notice that everyone the report quotes work at high managerial positions. The bailout is intended to give these fkfaces a lot of free money from the government. These people are the same people who got the US and the REST OF THE WORLD in this financial crisis. The people who support the bill ARE THESE FKFACES' FRIENDS. That is why you DO NOT VOTE FOR THIS BILL.