<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » Sports討論版 » NBA戰術驚現足球場 賓特拿擋切是否非法?
返回列表 回復 發帖
雲加雖然擁有「教授」的雅號,但在處理與自己球會利益相關的事情時,也從來都是最「護短」的。那麼作為中立的球迷,我們應該如何看待這個有趣、有爭議的入球呢?

當「小老虎」禾確特帶球疾馳奔向紐卡素的禁區之際, ...
kakeidevil 發表於 2010-10-29 03:27 AM
By the law of the game, offside call for Bendtner was questionable, cos he might/might not blocking the view of the GK/defender.... so by spirit of the Law of the game, "Attacking football". There was a right call.

However, even though Bendtner was never close to Walcott. But he blocked the Newcastle defender, a foul called must be made.. and there should be an indirect free kick for Newcastle Utd. This referee made a big mistake
題外話: 唔知版主你點睇蘭尼同高美斯單野?
Winters 發表於 2010-11-1 09:43 PM
Sorry, I was really busy last week as I got crazy refereeing schedule (27 hours per week)

em.. I think that's mistake by Gomez... I saw the replay and
1) referee never blow the whistle, that's truth if that's not yellow card offence, I would let keeper to hold the ball, instead of giving free kick (i.e. more advantage for defensive team, Spurs in that situation)
2) referee's facial reaction showed what's his decision. Gomez ran out more than 10 yards and dropped the ball down... seriously.. do you think that's the position of the free kick if that's held?!

so I think that's nothing for the referee this time....

Gomez was absolutely stupid in this situation.
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » Sports討論版 » NBA戰術驚現足球場 賓特拿擋切是否非法?

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。