|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.. E6 A; q/ u+ z) K b: u
/ R0 s' r, ~- s% n1 T( kaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
4 T: X( a& H6 P" q1 `) X$ {" M
( ^9 p" T1 p* }8 k$ n6 f4 }. W# zIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
1 r9 Y: k% E- M2 e' {and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.1 G; x* o5 c: h" O( \5 |9 ^* d
! X8 d# P4 S- p$ w& p$ hso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險9 |/ ^- d, F; f, S8 M
- w9 U( ^4 ^ {6 B! |! R
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, ' T; g* Y, Y$ l8 L: P$ v9 K+ {
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|