shaqkobe

Originally posted by CHECSS at 2005-11-25 23:13:

laker need a 中鋒(J.O'NEAL)

[ Last edited by CHECSS on 2005-11-25 at 11:15 PM ]

J.O'NEAL都唔係一個正高鋒。。。。。其實湖人唔係少梗個中鋒。只係少梗一個可以分擔kobe係進攻上壓力既球員，位置唔係最大問題。。。

shaqkobe

不過話時話。今年Garnett好似無之前咁勁，籃板同得分都下降梗。

CHECSS

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005/11/25 23:17:

J.O'NEAL都唔係一個正高鋒。。。。。其實湖人唔係少梗個中鋒。只係少梗一個可以分擔kobe係進攻上壓力既球員，位置唔係最大問題。。。

kobe太獨食

shaqkobe

Originally posted by CHECSS at 2005-11-25 23:18:

kobe太獨食

其實依家既情況唔係佢想獨食。其實上一季，已經睇得出佢知獨食贏唔到波，想做多D助攻，不過好衰唔衰其他球買唔敢出手。。。依家又係，odom無態、parker又唔係射得多果隻。。。布朗、佐治傷埋，成隊波可以補留下得分力既球員愈來愈少。迫到kobe又要以一己之力去搶分。。。！！

CHECSS

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005/11/25 23:34:

其實依家既情況唔係佢想獨食。其實...

姚明 , 大帝 or 加納特 buy 晒

shaqkobe

Originally posted by CHECSS at 2005-11-25 23:36:

姚明 , 大帝 or 加納特 buy 晒

無可能。。。。=.="
一個yao一千萬年薪、james又要千幾萬、garnett又要二千萬、加埋kobe果千幾萬，依家過左薪金上限啦。成6千萬。。。。

CHECSS

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005/11/25 23:39:

無可能。。。。=.="
一個yao一千萬年薪、james又要千幾萬、garnett又要二千萬、加埋kobe果千幾萬，依家過左薪金上限啦。成6千萬。。。。

o .................姚明+加納特

bigfish

火箭唔該換走姚明啦, 送佢去快艇換基文返黎, 咁就有救 la

nashisthebestpg

剛睇完湖人對sonic, 今日laker打得幾好,
得分點好平均,當kobe第一節初段2犯退下火線,
odom打得幾好,進攻意欲加強左,又無乜格硬黎ge情況,如果之後可keep住的話
應可大大減輕kobe的得分壓力~
(今日睇比賽見到一樣唔多好的統計,今季湖人的第一得分點同第二得分點的差距係19分,[kobe average 33分,odom14分],係繼公牛係87-88年佐敦同第二得分點奧克利差距22分後,
差距最大的第一,二得分點)---所以odom的得分意欲同起手選擇係十分重要,過份集中係一個球員的球隊係無好結果.............

其他球員方面,今日俾我最大ge 驚喜係 cook,今年終於唔係only企係3分線等波接,
比以前走多好多位,接應分波起手中距離都幾stable(希望唔係壇花一現),咁樣對laker bench
的得分有好大供獻~

而Smush Parker,一個以前從未聽過的名字,今年亦係laker一個好大的驚喜,射三分波同帶波都幾好,特別係偷波,睇highlight同今場都睇得出佢的偷波技巧幾好,
為laker帶來博turnover打反擊的機會(呢一點好重要,上年laker係迫對手出現turnover最少的球隊之一,睇得出上年laker防守幾咁差,而佢ge防守比上年ge Atkins好好多,parker真係一大驚喜),今日仲有球dunk超靚tim~

至於樓上有人話kobe太獨食.......身為湖人fans(應該係kobe fans),真係睇同回應都厭,
佢現時做ge野真係無得挑剔,今日除左進攻好,成功防守allen更是今日嬴波的重點,
key死波的次數比上年少好多,如果無睇比賽的人唔好咁莽下判斷!!!

雖然我以上講的野都係一場波的現象, 唔代表咩, 而家湖人差ge野就係隊波的融合,
亦係最重要一點,團體化學作用大於一切,呢個因素需要時間同經驗的配合,
雖然現時快艇的人腳比湖人好,但只要有kobe同phil jackson係度,咩都有可能發生,
而家只係季初,快艇係咪洛城一哥係明星賽之後就會明朗化,
俾d時間湖人同kobe啦~~~


+2

[ Last edited by shaqkobe on 2005-11-26 at 02:56 AM ]

Chenjinnan

Phil Jackson, I never agree he is 金牌教練。 Won champion with peak Jordan + peak Pippen + good players, won champion with peak Bryant + peak O'Neal + good players. What's the point?

When added Karl Malone and Gary Payton, they should win another champion. The reason they can't win is Phil Jackson. He only knows triangle offense, nothing more. When he has players best for different tactics, he made NO adjustment. What value he has as a coach?

Since last year, he no longer got the best group of players. See how he was doing? See how he is doing now? Did he make any adjustment? NO, but he requires his players to make adjustment for his system, rather than makes use of the strengths his players have.

+2

[ Last edited by shaqkobe on 2005-11-26 at 02:56 AM ]