Chenjinnan

Phil Jackson, I never agree he is 金牌教練。 Won champion with peak Jordan + peak Pippen + good players, won champion with peak Bryant + peak O'Neal + good players. What's the point?

When added Karl Malone and Gary Payton, they should win another champion. The reason they can't win is Phil Jackson. He only knows triangle offense, nothing more. When he has players best for different tactics, he made NO adjustment. What value he has as a coach?

Since last year, he no longer got the best group of players. See how he was doing? See how he is doing now? Did he make any adjustment? NO, but he requires his players to make adjustment for his system, rather than makes use of the strengths his players have.

+2

[ Last edited by shaqkobe on 2005-11-26 at 02:56 AM ]

Chenjinnan

唔唔唔... 今日 JK 好勁，差 D 大四喜，35 pts，12 ast，8 reb，7 to (哈哈)~~~

不過佢今日 FG 可以 11/21 (52.38%)，FT 12/15 (80%)，算係咁啦~

KB 雖然話 46 分，但係 FG 14/36 (38.89%)，如果唔計其中 3 分球 4/12 (33.33%)，即係得 10/24 (41.67%)，實在有點「浪」。無奈其他人仲唔爭氣，除左 B. Cook 有 5/11 (45.45%) 之外，全部食左屎咁，整體得 32/95 (33.68%)！

回想以前 MJ，雖然一樣係獨食 (所以我唔多喜歡)，但至少以生涯 30.1 PPG，49.7 FG%，實在唔簡單，尤其係 SG。你睇番而家所謂新星、巨星：

AI ── 27.6 PPG，41.8 FG%
LBJ ── 24.4 PPG，45 FG%
V. Carter ── 23.8 PPG，44.8 FG%
P. Pierce ── 23 PPG，43.6 FG%
KB ── 22.6 PPG，45.1 FG%
T-Mac ── 22 PPG，44.3 FG%

除左 Shaq 26.7 PPG，57.9% (仲要係 Center) 之外，根本冇人有以前 MJ 既水準。任你 D 傳媒、廣告商、marketing 點吹都好，根本自從 Drean Team I 之後 D 水準就一直退步，甚至可以話有今生，冇來世 (黃興桂金句)，淨係睇 Charles Barkley 6 呎 4 打 PF，22.1 PPG，11.7 RPG，54.1 FG%，簡直係奇蹟！ (記得佢後期轉去火箭，第一場對住舊隊太陽，就攞左 33 個籃板球！問你死味，6 呎 4 咋！)

而家 NBA，除左舊年 T-Mac 三十幾秒攞 13 分之外，都冇乜野驚喜‧‧‧

Chenjinnan

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2005-11-28 06:14 PM:

說實在,唔多鐘意人地無睇過比賽,onl...

強姦單野，擺明係切架啦，但係如果唔係自己衰鹹濕，又邊有得切啫~

Chenjinnan

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2005-11-28 18:32:

以前d 明星(無論center, guard or f...

對平傭球員就有影響，對巨星級就唔會 ── 以前不論 MJ，CB，Hakeem‧‧‧ 夠晚晚俾人 double-team/triple-team 啦，邊有話會易攞分過而家。

而家 D 明星，太注重個人技術，成日希望引人 double-team 然後 create open look 俾隊友起手，但係對防守個邊仲著數，只是補位夠快就得，模式簡單化。

其實要 create open look 應該要靠整體走位，做多點 screen，然後簡單的切入上籃或輕鬆的 jump shoot (係就係悶 D，好似以前 K. Malone + J. Stockton 咁)。下下都話要 fade away，360 轉體，硬爆，邊有咁多？係就係好睇‧‧‧

Chenjinnan

你兩個一人少句啦，係咪想好似今日 KB 同 VC 咁？

Chenjinnan

Originally posted by kakeidevil at 2005-11-28 19:01:



點???

double technical foul 囉~

Chenjinnan

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-11-28 19:07:

以前邊同依家呀。。。。依家D球員平...

可能係啦，之但係而家成日見佢地起手實在好勉強，明明有時間剩無啦啦就 fadeaway、in-your-face、硬闖‧‧‧ 隊友空晒都唔交波，炒左之後自己唔老黎之餘隊友都冇 mood，越打越沉‧‧‧

我唔多唔少係覺得而家 D 人一心係想打高自己個身價，rather than 真係想贏波，之所以近代多左 D「防守專家」都係因為咁。

Chenjinnan

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-11-28 19:17:
Jason kidd差D大四喜？？？差好多喎。

我計埋 TO，講下笑之嘛~

Chenjinnan

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-11-28 19:34:

應該係想迎合觀眾口味。。。

唔唔，強姦嗰下都係‧‧‧

條友根本就係自我、自大狂黎架啦！佢除左諗住做大哥大之外，邊會諗 D 觀眾乜野口味~

Chenjinnan

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news ... =yhoo&type=lgns