**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:?5mB'V m3r
,Z;b H:hO$e7S)cW%X
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]&JIxZt
)bS$_6XbfvcY
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
-E1h]af
why?
4mb g1S L@{O
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote]B%x5Itp%@i
_K*E`
{-T!Huw
see #22 Thus
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->9o%^2A\#x]} O.n:x8Z
*H q C1k*t%t
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
Q:De-c&`hJ#JG)F
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details.
%p,_6G w {
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.0xC@Ku[,E*?
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:3n'_+\9I U-z
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]VQ6Z {&m @G9I
H \
S5xu
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:`;GXg%C A+]7W
.\-m&{%YO.X}7R
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote]0D_.c3f y l/RpwN
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:xlgS`J'}$`
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:?-p]
o
xc,n+ml
w8y
v5J%|Cr
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........@7b8G^%Aw}
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
\:]fu7[0T%m
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:*B tMU4M4nY5w
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............'oF SM GF
係咪如此? [/quote]y/KtcPP T8zm
P/mN%^p`
0h0?&V%N
~3y
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:-V:T o8_['X}]s
5V5J7iQais
3N2]YRG6Y/t ]_1?-r
!wnXJ
l D*]
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,
nA7iG"b
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........h
I(HWk8sE`{
*VN+]I]+c#dm&LO
B
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM: py+U?@L7G)I]
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此? [/quote]
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
正史中張松只有110cm?:o/k^ Y-P5s"s%N6z
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
_/gTt5`)E5wc
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
7n L#R `tl ZG
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功? C,j
B)W$B,Q(r
f\zu*z'M gnHf
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂hL4r4T)Oy.r/P
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......;X x [
st1z s
z#oX!d
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!0Y"Y"W0KU0J3l
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的
zA5]-a3n S5U~i H
Q
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P