[quote]Originally posted by [i]magic[/i] at 2007-4-1 06:40 PM:
7PJ0eB-b
..............但係佢淨係[[[翻查]]]]一本[[[典籍]]]...[[廣韻]]來呃人...扮晒研究左好耐咁呃人..未經咨徇就揾電台跟....就十萬個不對... [/quote]\3A!|md9__
你點知佢你呃人
你都研究過?
你又知佢係"扮晒研究左好耐";)
佢搵到渠道去公開佢ge研究成果..有咩唔岩:confused:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]pigcat[/i] at 04:48 PM:
咁咪你又你角..佢有佢國lor
佢都講明... [/quote]
8d&Q0d*@vj,M6i%f
何氏讀音推行左成廿年,一直以來都冇講過最重要跟返當時人o既讀法,在最緊要正字節目-Q;}ectys#dSU`
初期教人讀姓"韋"o既"韋"字都冇講過呢點,係之後畀人嘈過先加返呢句
|(ytM.s'L
好喇,o既然佢地認為要尊重當時人o既讀法,咁佢地點解要推廣一d一般人唔會讀o既讀法Z.a+^
Kn
,咁樣係咪唔尊重歷來一般人o既讀法
7s^1Z(h9\ ^O v
到左而到,好多人都已經畀佢地蒙蔽,”當時人”o既讀法在佢地o係媒介學校推廣之下已經不受大眾尊重&PR ?x8{ v8d-[[K c
,搞到而家好多人信左佢地先扮晒大方咁,這正正是何氏音謀的可怕之處
[[i] Last edited by 阿感 on 2007-4-1 at 08:22 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]阿感[/i] at 2007-4-1 08:19 PM: K+HX ~&V6su
h%qO`uR
何氏讀音推行左成廿年,一直以來都... [/quote]*|,~9lDlh/~
就好似我D堂兄弟...因學校話..郭應讀國...冇話讀角係對....r,]Dd"[
佢地在小學時..冇人同佢講..何氏音其實未經公認..〔未經公認就當成對..好比新药未經医學界承認有效就拎去賣〕M&T8W/p0DT{)v
只是他們何氏認為對...
把未得大部份學者同意就四處推廣..就是誤人子弟..i9p-N%? ~ S
C9b#T.Z9B
[color=Red][size=6]重點是:...把未得大部份學者同意前就四處推廣...絕非正派學者所為..[/[/size]color]-og]
d)US5S(d"w
[size=6][color=Red]望所有網友明察[/color][/size]Md)[-_2yj
1i&A6G'S^6cC
[[i] Last edited by magic on 2007-4-2 at 02:22 PM [/i]]
but in mandarin "郭" is sound in "guo", which is same as "國" in mandarin...8TU |u7\)a
just provide information only..
hope u wont mind... ^^'
[quote]Originally posted by [i]eagledogfox[/i] at 04:18 PM:1U8^0z!a^-[ f{yl
but in mandarin "郭" is sound in "guo", which is same as "國" in mandarin...%ZncJ(JnH6n3n ?8PiV^
just provide information only..Kww(AD4k,F8d]D
hope u wont mind... ^^' [/quote]|!h0n"]H5^
有很多普通話讀音都與粵音都有這種區別,一樣可以用這個方法去否定何氏讀音係錯
在粵語中"孩"字與"鞋"字同音,普通話則不同讀法,那麼是否表示粵語或普通話的讀音存在問題?:ET_~8ip3a8S%}
aqE%E)EM
要知道,普通話與粵語是兩套不同方言,語言發展上有很大區別v2h6Ngd7?
[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=127068&fpage=1&highlight=%E6%BC%A2%E8%AA%9E[/url]G7{C6F["]0n$Eg gc
既然兩者發展方向不同,怎麼能用其中一種去否定另一種呢?
[[i] Last edited by 阿感 on 2007-4-2 at 09:37 PM [/i]]
呀何博士的粵音論, 其實只在他所屬大學有比較多的認同. IL3IOhW7D
想想, 他的學生學了他的一套理論, 之後又教育下一代... 死未?v)d [a(DEf`
你可能被何博士的學生教過...