問卷小調查: 閣下有沒有看過"慾照風波"的原圖 ?
版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題.Z#l2B*fN
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票.
k DNee RsY3bJi!J
樓主[b]不[/b]鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為. 完全沒看過 :cry: if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man [color=Red][size=6]抗議！
^/w*^T3H
只許 [b]谷德超[/b] 商場 買 翻版鹹碟%d$\J Cmn yA)N
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照)nt*Z n1o
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！[/size][/color] fv"i&y buz&U)T
3r#g i2H [7auF
[[i] Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM [/i]] [color=Red][b]What is the definition of "原圖" ? :confused:[/b][/color]*r}6S:j6m ^'i
%j@!ez!Wm3{
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,
and "[b]I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD[/b]"....ylyTC^rqG"P
{j)~6N*GQ9ug)u
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....:) I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. FGXW,Jx @;`'F8GO
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.
Well, just my personal comments.6U5\%qN;xt
Hv a nice day. **** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 **** 未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= = 我完全沒看過...4S ]7W-~1BsK9z
你信唔信ar?:kicking: 暫時都未睇過 ><! 看過少少...... 秘密~唔話你知><
頁:
[1]