娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:U7c7Fj;c+d bl
wX&YQ ~O,P

0iu2c;jE|Q]
;gq]L p ^'k 講得合理亦有道理~:agree:
xr{X?M/d"q 只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]O5m v$eF%g

P_w,U2?5q+y|"o'S BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:1v*f h#bd g(l
I'm nobody.
S"["U:j b8B M)Fgj M 8u \:NFO3{Ww0zt

?3p P;P,_"`&wf 不過段片又真係好誇張,3sbV9|5Anb'?!C4P
尤其最尾一腳,
b}:U-`l%I'c 踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),*ys f\(L$Z+MD
若我唔回應幾句,
3_'\+zU!LCo 個心真係有D唔安樂...r;p@-U5e i
%u6H!pv&e ?czRT
[[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:7E?Bb { iV
9}-A[0x8Qf#{}
香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例dha0ts%u5f4|

6q"WM}0p 第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)hR`5Z2Cm.a
第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年).k F#X2c? l V5A^(Ht9Wk
第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)a*M ~aQ7Zb2b4go _
第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)-\3H+S5VZ8V;j;A
{ PM!g ~7Y$jYMF
@.O9R~q3@` g
身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:^,V r!K5_4G\*l#C
1Zbg)_gf,LV
p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
S&zR/P+cN        但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]M,l q1^1`:x)tRl.G

gh/}oBlcJ 唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:
:TNS#{CM 咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
3Sd*b:@hV[bc S6E k.V"n xr!n-@
KJ9aD$[
既然唔知頭唔知露,
tlBH:P d;O;h 一開口就話個... [/quote] j6{Q3U y
`7J9i&t4kf2I3H
x1j-h1T4P&[s
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....
J}0A)\T,e!z5\U C T*qOnH'j
you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....u UQp\f8Kb \w

F%U V){{.r%s-T{1V (yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl) L/|O1Fwudm3IV
"BCX6nnn+M
however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....,Jobg8q4{q.j6i

_ KFn5K.a2UcF7| "個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,~j9~E,|c#yU
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??
6O^+k;M;p9F{U 當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??4FC,L H5p
至於你問有咩正當理由,*u%s3J)WL){7H-w
你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
Wm/W U+HN1j
cku'A_'z"E!\a what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....Kbo*}"U&m0^,g.q

1F:Df4g?(g2I }tf d1C-M&U ______________________________
fEa/vb5] Z k
/v&H#^yR{^W^ well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩:Hn'rG)F.M2B0{
因為男人生下來比較強壯?
a.l&Dy#g8w*BOHy 如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
e_&`)C/A|[(tG` 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?['T)})s-H*H-V!W1b T
打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:
m}qt&qt)C 唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,dSH j;UI3h6s&}
有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,@8Q*|L Q+[?_
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖}Y:y(DI{P
我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力, iBP'N AK
在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:p`8Qy:\6n\ro
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:![&R`lu@J$Xf6z

,Jt2[EYe ?O h&M!T2O0MU+vT3c ?
我想講嘅,8a}^:F@;fJ1vh{
只係我地根本唔知咩事,;Opi ux;`fp4j
就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
RaKO} DV 咁對個男仔公平咩 ?? lG\%J8q+{D9_&E
%WC DOwH)k-j
p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]6Wy:Z D%Ix&w

oj9E$|GY that means you still don't understand what other people are saying9[!|)?#Z hlE
OkME?@3FK[m
no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....l8f;N:k MP-Ga8I"b

%WO:tl mB,`Z*[ the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:}q&BHP Z(i
都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]
:|%Q st7c!w8f BC*H'A1x[7c
2LReK,\K9M m0s#F
then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
Y7d!l"t d oE .W$k"EL;wf9v t
do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????
[*^ j8CE OU5PB"U
tcV2E nR$H6D1o if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????B8Jh%D` wJ"v%I

^[O&Qqi ohAz -waLk2g/Pay
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!
m-Zb9wXv!O1\4A,yIw A7~e;R ]3\%f
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,q6ec{g&w sG N`{6lq
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.
2D7f4M.p}7On
y/~,iK[ 首先: BELIBALA-soZD#n
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
m!CZJ6SC5l5y #17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.*]!j5b xrM0g1_J/E
#18, OK:)
K;yUR:i!r jy:J,P #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:3L:e*vq X2K*P
ps. 有進步 good!:good:
~)DA d#_7i
,y0Y3~BT!~ infjlam
$Z D}\)P$p$xb+] #30 good point, :good:4{V:?&?;t5LsjE
#34 GOOD POINT:good:i3uA[4z+gE
#63, 講得好!
]9LeV5@@*v y,f)Dz#fB
Jen01,5eEd8x ZFn
S |#j-~4r ~\ P
#33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.
%J5nPqi*O'k1S;G 如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!#jgJ5{O1r
你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"
S Y8fYU!q 我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?O:ExiY6L
)xR'en.K-qJ&b o `d
SLWONG3,}Y$~qe!O:M
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
v ?^$t%k 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:!vY?k j@
,U@GB5Xm&b
jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......
:@6RhMCB 在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.
L$\p~O(SE$@s 而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
hoi^&t!m;l#PP3b w 1emr ?m7P9^G
[color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
w}6_(D x O 個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
z4@1b[f 仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,
M3erB4s@BA,sc9d 咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]M*b7b8p _ mvc
我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀
_-^c;cpJ ePu Gf]
[color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,"v1]kCR_
       但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]A;e![.N V_
呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:Wg*PZ Eak#^5`)mj

5CY }&^3[~T jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****
]-{Z@fS%U6a fN:poy
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^!gPG/B0N_)F5sN2?0d

~] P!F&@-I 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時4n"`M5cAd%T

+eES&yj*Y 常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??2gh/BDN X$rI1m
,tA0A#xN:w\3Hf!R~
你意思話我知, 6~8v/@uO;Y

&b-Lr*`z!nZo1J'~ 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯 ? UK ] ^5S

m'b.i y8m^Z+B,h:nvi 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例5b5~K+AC;J

t)SE({"[ 包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,    qL JJ,l

2IO }+]7CUM[-F^ 係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護1PyxCV~

l*A QQ0@3@X~6P ^ 照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:ee!Hj$Y J.f7s0f-~R9]
AEiW:y&L(Y

A!zRK/@y@ 既然唔知頭唔知露,
X5{{3iAOS 一開口就話個... [/quote]qm;He,@"E^j:d
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰$T#jqiY V
i7fe e5Li4Y%Q
我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,4a TR9q2]w]$T
e8jIe WiH
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯
ZQh r3Iv 0I C[y S1u*}
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
@1X e B-[:p #?Q.a9C%ir[
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??.Dw0JG*O ~9P4X"N|
wS o!ND)o|
以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能,aB aMd/K

7C)]s.h| 個男人根本冇控制自己既能力
"[`!qK rK :O!~ T*A+[
我問你,  K)Oztt6Y KRl
GzHN+c#l9A^}
世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??B&N(f/\;|"K \
Z;f\S7Y~
除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
/kk m^LJ S(}%L[
9zS{qd6X7[ RK 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話.xW[2Jjk G
b/J3WO#e,Qz
不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢
[.T$?4p3?)mP'w2C
NpeOrt 係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能){A3]W\;Yd g
UF(@/EP;`
ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰pw [ F bd"j*w
*o,w6W1Pt p"a,u%d}-q`
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
)N9u-d5Q#Z5P 2L+DxP&LC,C*v
[[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可u/r!eT7R%}
F ]m/m*hxW8x
我比多個例子你啦,s)A:P[:\q9}

S:Wu!z)V n 係香港  
~)W-m)~[vw%o
.kQ,wa }6M 曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
nXE:g,l7Uyf 1`E*Z f{Q&FS
結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
N/LYFOR`
$k-T8JDJ*{9?#e Y'GZ 雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪
oo,n [/x&Q8Hc
8_&WXGp p"J 你點理解??
4Z o ?}9P{v[-G
_E;o!AV? 呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事...."a#w`3o@ w5Tl

&Q m i"\ C5?d8UW4Y    四川官員就毆打義工道歉 nt5ku!NAm1y8E'b
[28/05 星期三 00:30]
"w-p7W{1W&qufb 2hZf_A:p*Z

;k O9B#_D/?#I!I 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。GOZ)PF%[eS

&g!`A W.Uu5zl#qqw 事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。p7q|4}5e6tV

l9a8rKQdR EK [url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.