娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:
6gR+{1gV {^ck
x)R*w:JHO?Y [wxkE4K
@b6Lw;TP.Ci%y
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:
[+d|(K A2Ki \5?|V 只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]WyB$L SJ V3]8g\4o
hTK:P} A
BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:
#Z6jC6r?~ I'm nobody.QU.G~ h8tF5Nb'lj
p-?LO7z g'y
X1U9bMC[[~+{
不過段片又真係好誇張,
.\ d4}Ud~E-O2F 尤其最尾一腳,
e2hn5L6w8l%|}g 踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),
^5K A&nG,d-[ 若我唔回應幾句,$W+e&}!a XJ
個心真係有D唔安樂...%`sfNTk7U:u
|?IU3n1B{4d
[[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:h D3_B _?5zmw
Q.^'L&G2o4J1`;~
香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例
A_8pTc3M %KM m.st8_.v%et
第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)
c|3f"\{:GOg 第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)P/w\:B'q#WX1N7K
第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)
?"C*zKqq!X^ 第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年):s9H8y)lM K&N
[1|%z_o T@[-A1D+UG8D
S_ G;QZWO
身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
w5Hf u2xU OyR E{
Y2q]'G0@:I ZZ j p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,@b+w1H8v3K3W
       但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]
O4g+E"Df
o#[:^dkl-G 唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:
+eH\"x:Y 咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
,`.`#`lK { 5Sl!ZQ6_*B%q_nB
K b5l+w+G| e
既然唔知頭唔知露,\/X1Qv w)n9[2B_"M
一開口就話個... [/quote]
l Ns,a9F/S i^p
8V8_0W:X;Zva'gF
zY0|p^M.At Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread.... [\ g2d-q

'pj1kTu5{CUs$K you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....
dP]w\D eq
#P!d3Y3S!U)z%E*sQy (yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)
F%v#P Q`fCW;L7h~~6w
p:hDh5L"n$fN8j however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....
!@ h U6U~L/H ?$T? ?.k0S2@,Tj%x F(mj+S
"個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,G so2F)p Es7R
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??$\#M%z;l7U3d:z!z
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??
zY8b%^8X3VfIJ9N 至於你問有咩正當理由,L$]B{B9T4`$d$e
你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
X [l'q9k
J7j$bK [h what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....2[)[4P/`C7` o
d ~ }5`(}l[;p
______________________________7s| P~8h.W.Fy l

9@ K0KA9e9@ well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩
2|"G4O3e3} ](ewH)w}N 因為男人生下來比較強壯? T%D;Sc+Zd
如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:eQ7^RUNx.n!d
打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?4BtKZPD/s Z
打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:p.\5oi*m$F&G
唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,/v&Y ntE-_2yJ h:_
有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,N,DpY qM
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖
:K`8XNm!Q 我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
9_p0DE-^2]%`#Mdy\ 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:g{-b(rxd#PI"jJN
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:
-dw,j9i!@^ v z)F`"qb

~&?}6x(J;iE"f-Y#i 我想講嘅,
9_Q!Z#LE,JP 只係我地根本唔知咩事,+};k`9D ^;U)c:J
就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
"_~8^X*`#c 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??S+N6UD} |

(JE4LWZ PwP p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]
2P;x @HZ:j%IQ AJmMI![
that means you still don't understand what other people are sayingadsU2Ipp-`V
w&H8b;]4k'c/UJ
no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....
$] L!xP9g
3lDJ&_d the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:`P^FY}-~
都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]]"nE b+`s
$A Cst$U
*JY6QV:d&ht!D W
then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?6To6K-`@ev
{!^s^U|
do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????
"v1`2z&l'u2xEK(P 7uC*kPg
if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????+zE'SF#DUA0a'm4B0x:X

BikzHE4Pv^ ^x&dmI.pS
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!
,D ]3WWBx {R#@ S\8p"q1FV}
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,
p;qI*R@8|#yo.G$j 可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.)u.f(la:}o

\:j@1at1D!Ac 首先: BELIBALA5vP!l7n3vM;d N
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
M A9f7N{1e8M)v6d #17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋. \ lV$O1M+F
#18, OK:)
(ahVYjiu7_8[ #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:6~c`+fAl,]t+PW:n
ps. 有進步 good!:good:
O4~AS F Jzey Rv;gNbCV
infjlamW"^4[i"u2b!_
#30 good point, :good: };_ VM0L
#34 GOOD POINT:good:~0H9[t9VUO
#63, 講得好!
G1j8z;`C? qT
p:y,jH C] `B0s Jen01,-{ E3Mv b3r4O

\2u,zZ.e'K #33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.
)}dU3MJ6xi,Av 如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!
O;Z4F&`!c?e-X-? 你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!")[,qx}b
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?
*\%O+[ Y&b_c.B
0V#Q3y mVySYt&E SLWONG3,
'bv*?6e3q0ph #71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
#`5_7@#C4}z3Sz^ 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
0f-P7s@|[,K
!rg;N!F{*B8X/HG jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......
]#wt+C$e 在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.
#V^vPnj!G R`.@oU 而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
%Xl'G/k!g/n+`\HX/Y!bm H [?0ux3^W-c-DA
[color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
n$q ]6kn Zy4j 個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
^1W)X E|I 仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,
3cU ~q|e&F 咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]
v1iK2[,{m]8g 我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀
'W*JTw)cwRu A6l\r]4dt
[color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
t%i5CG V,x5J2c;l"s        但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]?o3j^5[+b#c Q*T
呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:
X#MF1@h!bvpc
Bm/`$Q|S i jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****
8P2le:B2n
2uRV/p#by [[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^
-t&x#M\|)e|
dh-J#|7[:Bn+yO 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時qH?6yid4fs fGn6A
3x@D7G Y9xByi+I1m
常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??;P$aH w0|_(T S
$D!Ol\WbB
你意思話我知,
V8VF1o}j\X
R#vm:gaz0xI^m^ 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯
*b9l9?]yT OC0TvL,f,G
第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例S @{-[ ~
ZO$y'B@9wH
包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   ku9j.u/\:?
1gFLg-e-r9iW
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護/l] ]~p

GfD v6V7K;v4lbhv 照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
}3\(s{{
:G*hLhZM LoY(WG
既然唔知頭唔知露,
%N'IV#rn1eW.^h 一開口就話個... [/quote] qw_6z:H1N@6C
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰,rbu$i)Tbi

?}2A\vY 我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,l[2d0{9p
:VOv$P @\MQ
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯(J%h6W1K(u
2]-A ? |$ps)_
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
p+n9|wy;q,{{V1u_ -SXN%~9\5f
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??
@(N~ L6y%r+?C
"]/~1J/T+['K ZpxB 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能
K:L-O d&~"E2cE S
/W7?'f2P#VP 個男人根本冇控制自己既能力 Byg D#T4_%G.@%L$[
"q*j'q]${!}G
我問你,  BY:O@"p4O|:G
e*q0El@'`6[qK
世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
dl7_{!A +Se.j"o^XLj
除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
.z9t"Tz?m6vZ
8^\oRi`7][ S q 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話
O$km6k(X6h8~:qL I\ bT"WhPM
不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢
2XV[ \-U:I,A-j ?
T8i.zi}f+g8Uly 係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)
\ah@!ss2A5XB #E5p7M:z5`~
ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰!w$UPk7kk"s [
u o ep)`G5~IyJ:o
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲 n,j(Q.S3I)FQKEI ^PD {

*QBXN1`4~ [[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可OB"V7U#nC-}UV

+u?,D0i9`]*e 我比多個例子你啦']$q:x:j"]

B Rwd!c~6n 係香港  6`O9Xja

&L/x x[r@0UF 曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上PAWC~u_ P7}_

*r{_*f0H 結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為-g&D5X_%sH q
'p p a&K rK:l.g
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪u8zCX MU

I$P6g3A1B-m3o$Rx*s},rI$W 你點理解??
s(bJ;fdK+W
XGI}*a,g 呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....E&G|2]#q D{

*e8SPV Iv,r    四川官員就毆打義工道歉QEJib [1~b/IU
[28/05 星期三 00:30] o!Q&i4G\`}
x,otB|!S6_zT

X:\lS!B9[p^)p 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。?Yl3Ke;OJm,B

5[(t8u[X 事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。
?{^Q:KVC f[2n9Au H
[url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.