娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
\7~0]GK9`6hZW [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人,t N'[FAeg4z
pI2@e'A
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
!r6P6Z+k/u0\1I-e ?$y | syS%f)i)X&q jU
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
b S K;[-v |.M]8C3k7?
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.e MF3i"^
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
w-Irs Nr x
4u!Q A9N)D1q+gg]/b 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, VNW5R%?-[:U$Z2q
)n0V N{ J:U
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! 8q3nA]NDDb
4P(Tg}[)F FzF
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
[Qx*]uhoYPi _G
%_cp L(H vZ 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, /nM:d;W.Xvn

5IX.u5M'| m4Wyi 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; n9MO@[
X LA/Ig+c7Gs
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
\3_1h/zdC#x J dC-eBe/]Ml$A
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
W{$R:a~ |h
m4K*i&X.Eg P 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
$t@"};e2jd"sq "\-WZm)N%q6\
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦 ?d!c7SPBg_jR
;W(|.W Ts7k
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!thIk S0u"w&Q(t
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
$x@-B'u ~&X.h japan has been very influential nowadays. ibpW4H D |
although i hate japaneses, but in UN, k:L{$J1w+B _(u0V
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size] K Al,j+h;H#zJ
fOY:f(^ c2V Y
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?4x+LY"C;x,uxKw

3}1b K,z;[ d2r] 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:b*na0E vY
shall we be more reasonable?6^M q'W6So+_'snq
japan has been very influential nowadays.
_2F2X0_fb}(S)ji although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
0JhAYAa2` k japan should occupy a place. [/quote]?*RH/Q i1[5xb$b

J n#B0AK(GQr
.C5R:h Se$}` 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
P,X;F-c#P 日本係好強我絕對認同
v| B!DH nF;?z 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
ZF/bPb_;V4p 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,@kvfU {b%ZsP@

FmYV2Q+^V.Eq 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),3ULBg"_4e

/z'd0^/POD4o ] 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),+?+mu6PF2y'og6C

] i L_)J ` 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:Zr.@+Jw3v]2E;r
Fv!l3{]5jL]xT!r
'w\%X)YpP
T(up u Gb s
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...-Sn$N5go!]Z.x"c
日本係好強我絕對認同
U8] C H7s.~B 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
S1[ q m Z$m` 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]`j5g'z ?P k7a
zE2iDzY}

;DKV j&T,m/w
0T ]+U#o)W 4`|[@,^&GR
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
'Y2rV ^e)dtr in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
+@ UX g-j{8@V a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
0h0s&v6x&B tUfR Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
.H]%O5y}6K*@OAmW J{R9s'C0We;p&qB6y

\G]&K;A#V?:E 5QTx9Nmv
~R:y;cp

b6|+Gb(`W3X R3s/u.L^kb&d8T&Mh
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.&J*L.{I VMs;{b
[/quote]
1p eK^+R6~m/^2h ?P~gi i'u
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@8W;j8Hrq)`X

*m3j[D#[,_@ 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:!W8yEh'E%u/M(xS)@
[size=6]講到強,)P$TYl.j8@,j
xY M@M x&O
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
C2?D/SBSB
/Oc)l$M;N 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),*if,r$knO

sGQN!u'h4~Sbl/H 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]{`9t(b%w_N]
Fbw"s`I-g
R#hKg W!r'E]t
the bro knows quite much of history.w Nz1N#Iy+n
^S:v1H1h)E@vG[o
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.9xJ J[^!T

:E9jx$qy;gZ6](] ](r Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it."Uw ]5@ ]

7a-s:pE(S0T7Z China has a right of veto否決權.
[K\n(s ? If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,ztGy#n"` l)E
the issue will au---atically be banned
`#c$A6c$@~n.L p3s Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
KG#p'd9v}%T%H!S
/Gu| H:v!K%w8l "@Z~$r F!Z-fgQ
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
c3hUD[+_x+W :{eOb*Z7Q5@5H4R
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
4n y+]xe1`8~
-qL3G&YZ_VL :f} ^m8` y'wn5?QDy
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.ztaH8E)_
tW@9^;p
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
'P oP.y0S%fa [.o ts(O5]/P
why it is called "Brick"
}&v#]$c7Y4` mAB
0x7[3u+k8is it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and ChinaD;^!A,i+o1u{(e]o

-n)Qnh3D e{"e %MOAQTj[G+KP$m

J/S~bJ|6k PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.