娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
Nr7|2h\m"LCv x [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
7p g Y;V"L
:p9_ g&VT6rN 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國Z8buq%lT/^:@
ga y/zs]r
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子1DbhD6N,`!y2@4L
$jN(j]+Gq9x;K
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.{^8BR;N0V2g
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
x5As:V @ t j*g0L9`C
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
@$aVQ,B-NDqKG{O `-}{d Ui
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
]|#q?9W YG
&vU4C@"O"wk 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
MLZ7dzk/b8E8n"`G ,Q2ut'm!mN!w1cv%gu
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, (~-io5Z"O)ou2v

|zAJ7q k 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; S;MAN2He,G)d-}

.jf9F;\;K0U.c 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,,Z Y4I"Ve{Cu

p2Pv_7[3zhz O 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? 5B9q$^$b&rzw
RV1R3ddd/|@1h
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
~'snl2G\,Jw )\O$uq$G.l
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
aEA:U$B8p`o ~uo8y5E2b
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
zJMt xl S :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?9d%j]k&w
japan has been very influential nowadays.
,^}ig p0{%V although i hate japaneses, but in UN,:vb"Gu1dJr#s
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
*J6C1Z7ghwD G8znN([gS
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
/BYj!Mt;R$HIG
Pz"r?$V6_ i 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
6v"Iv#EzR,hI:k shall we be more reasonable?
8v#l`;f8e$k/d(U%sp1A"d japan has been very influential nowadays.W(|4~ D5L|HB
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
W+Dz9^bf0W japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
pV9ql%qR0g $o2o'hC G]&p`
m;V7Bg~+jb
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
9?y}wE|1RX 日本係好強我絕對認同x%vN5a~
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...lA7`!w [9I8lZ
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
4Xy8n-a,Y.f /g2yj} f7H,K*_#g w'?
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍), r aF2J8i.O

Y;R2A$U1l-G#E 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),)lj,f#M(ihL

R!}cbf+o vy 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:|4YG4l7cb
3@w!n3x6q6ez's
7d'N~ ?z'Z%Mb `)~+P

:V(S ~\Wa5eB EY"L 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...ZLD [s
日本係好強我絕對認同
$x2ydvkT$K+|}5V0PN 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
QHT i{Jy*K 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
(v@@}]@5E @1tXDBz5n"@'[/A
rrb!Ekt5l
4?C8W_?

:X"g6a7F6J8O1h9z i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
$BQ5dF4b.T1Cs in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
C(\oD8L a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries -L1P1JAt&_+f1y
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
2\6]5h!{u }Rb
9IIu.u(p+t3WqN
5aofJ\(Qi}
uy(TP zQ
dh AC:Q5~2G*S &CA#J[v#x
]UDb6g @#A5w0|
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.;|4JI!WO+@4u
[/quote]&X(D F&qqiDhn;E u

.SR ?P/SJ$c"w 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
(W$n$C!h@8Y;q q$OR;@9CP
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
gf5D'cqI m8S [size=6]講到強,
6g0\pG i"}mq
m1{.F t{'u$a8D 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),E5?R dqg:tR

.c[O{tfA k 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),7sE8W$s"qc"x

p AO,@(~m 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]&NU$fha

7`Fs\C8l
k/l6?+xaTMkR#] the bro knows quite much of history.
t1i)b~KTK~`
qP@#D8D5A3C Z UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries..h)R6sL9v^5H\
n.X"aF,@+K
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
bh7La!LWN
Z!L \ cM4G)i lw China has a right of veto否決權.
f rgYR.Zh{%Q If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
gcJ/~&`)J the issue will au---atically be banned
].C+R/{C5s Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:s l MB4Wu

YS@szS'm~l5~
r-d0I.v7E;b1FHc 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@&Iy;c~&xg
(x L3u@i#WDG
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote],X/M4Lm"`c

}C.yC+s([
u#H Dn3B `s)b 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003. Y u'_W\+w4\

Vs-W6B:^^D One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
3RV9GH4v$j
#^L9O1z-VXw W q.D why it is called "Brick"%{J)T?q4u.J

WY#UQt3{ it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and ChinaS+W9l5kF_3|5Y
0YH5`.j$z?V T
s"}MVuT@5h
;C9J%AydSP @
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.