娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
2F~9E?1C;J,P [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人8z9_k(L_ cz {

Pv3C a4| W;t 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
4}%@ G"yXTZ
1iX7xv8|2@!['yq 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子6M&w0q`3\C)H"S
,l)gyzH'C*r;rZ
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人./s+?'i-UInM#p
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
fFbm#V
:~gbk {2m [F 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, 4H+RIWk"wf$k

{o4G[m*D%jnd 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
{u0P z,j.\4n b h E#{@ Bet
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 hg nJM+L#{
:td qnd-u/C
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
k1j,Rx+k}9O2i
%M'za d W7U&j B 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
^7C{5|*ts
NGR;gF'i-@ 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,K(g5y$fcj|X
5h{ [7fCPP
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? %D'Q S8wY*A
k0W;U5Y2| Z,|
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size] `"J8_Nl
Xx%V Y!g.X)C;?`
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
,vj5Xw~q9aR
_0U"W I(g8|y1s 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!9}D+mFUH8p C0[3y
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
5HFy_K[ japan has been very influential nowadays.
6D/Ue;Rg;ENF/m] X although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
D!s-S*_Y*c japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
!AWkL.P
%\l[(_^1F$__-D 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?|jsOAJW k&F

!gk D4e*tA*yh 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:.U mc F7i;m
shall we be more reasonable?
2[)iK.Y+[_9D japan has been very influential nowadays.
3ptEv4@FpMb1E although i hate japaneses, but in UN,(qCAh"t1U
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
!a e,})P!Z-K r6R#sm4m3y$u4T-A
Rv3K'DQs
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
N+|8jp i V5Al 日本係好強我絕對認同c {S4Jm,@
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...{(TD3R9r/g B a z
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
d`1w/btv+XV;\ Q3S 5c6C%xV.@1oM
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),H { x o\2f+D8j*M
m ^F+_YUM1s9o
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
L3Wh6K c2v{6m#b %U-J5Tr;r)R1? Sn
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:)L u'\Q]-]

1S8U+v{$G!R^sV
Z-o:wZ@)}[K
*T G;S&@3lF'g QOm 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
-X&m.d)qh:q.R.a 日本係好強我絕對認同%a4oJ,u*w9T
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
RQ(w} K4P'm4d*B 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]ZT7xgF

R9{ @,cq K!`0]r Y0o%kMJ0F*QHt
k)mC3wC

-~q'SW1i i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
V9}$_AdP!G in the next 50 years, japan will decline.7~ e;U7Q&r;l
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries qM fhg7dPt
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:'P8a.G3Be3[Y8z
)RLu%y-j

W WA~"r b,] (dB o2O/}"l;}b F
-@"RRI*|Z
pfh.ShY3W G

5~PvD3Y/?;Hw in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
,keK}#C(sr5Vh [/quote]
"O)D-}:JE:p:[T?
4kZ,`w6t,_j 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@6x ~4h6nc
kA(O#c vyrJ
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:Fxj8U `Q$D1q
[size=6]講到強,O#df4m+G!M0}H

W }*_ hA&G1Z1ui 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),4[;jEORT~ V/{+O h

OXB9A.a ? 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),E J hl%b4d ]6n
!~~0Q[L"D
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
2E^6tdd)@]$T (Z'i5V&\!S
+B:^ o;v*v
the bro knows quite much of history.
1?~:m3k|:`(S w7I~#s ]jr
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
9el$]Dk&|'Q
#e;@ U,p ? Cj"r} Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.Z;K^1F0jF!]2FX*x

#fl'Me$CMKFI China has a right of veto否決權.9_+d nM/G^
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,;J\F D6R9t/a|/i%M
the issue will au---atically be banned,L sw Mr? Y-J7P
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
` _O}s?i
1bKfp7e~H j C-Pc|$]d3\5Q
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@(p5O_.p^7hP0@[
@!nL @7L m[
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]B(Ei:{)Oa4z

:]wy@4r
1tpM u-M ~3u:J 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
8u~8[&CE3Y-g IC_7h-kW [&k
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
O_;Xr.? _A9R&H
?qWn7R x(P why it is called "Brick"
5HP)pe;n 1[cuw/dl
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
$BD m"|t fzaT
2d RE wZfLr t
F~c%v0^#I9AT L4U
x5jP:y0t(O+^ x PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.